JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 2244-2254, 2007. First published August 22, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00482.2007
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/2244    most recent
00482.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonin, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Orser, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonin, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Orser, B. A.

{alpha}5GABAA Receptors Regulate the Intrinsic Excitability of Mouse Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Robert P. Bonin1, Loren J. Martin2, John F. MacDonald1 and Beverley A. Orser1,2,3

1Department of Physiology and 2Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto; and 3Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 27 April 2007; accepted in final form 17 August 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
GABAA receptors generate both phasic and tonic forms of inhibition. In hippocampal pyramidal neurons, GABAA receptors that contain the {alpha}5 subunit generate a tonic inhibitory conductance. The physiological role of this tonic inhibition is uncertain, although {alpha}5GABAA receptors are known to influence hippocampal-dependent learning and memory processes. Here we provide evidence that {alpha}5GABAA receptors regulate the strength of the depolarizing stimulus that is required to generate an action potential in pyramidal neurons. Neurons from {alpha}5 knock-out ({alpha}5–/–) and wild-type (WT) mice were studied in brain slices and cell cultures using whole cell and perforated-patch-clamp techniques. Membrane resistance was 1.6-fold greater in {alpha}5–/– than in WT neurons, but the resting membrane potential and chloride equilibrium potential were similar. Membrane hyperpolarization evoked by an application of exogenous GABA was greater in WT neurons. Inhibiting the function of {alpha}5GABAA receptor with nonselective (picrotoxin) or {alpha}5 subunit-selective (L-655,708) compounds depolarized WT neurons by ~3 mV, whereas no change was detected in {alpha}5–/– neurons. The depolarizing current required to generate an action potential was twofold greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons, whereas the slope of the input-output relationship for action potential firing was similar. We conclude that shunting inhibition mediated by {alpha}5GABAA receptors regulates the firing of action potentials and may synchronize network activity that underlies hippocampal-dependent behavior.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The ionotropic {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A (GABAA) receptor is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor in the mammalian brain. GABAA receptors are pentameric complexes that contain various combinations of {alpha}1–6, beta1–3, {gamma}1–3, {delta}, {rho}1–3, {varepsilon}, {theta}, and {pi} subunits (Rudolph et al. 2001Go). A diverse array of GABAA receptor subtypes occurs, each with unique developmental and regional patterns of expression and distinct pharmacological and biophysical properties (for a review, see Whiting et al. 1999Go). The physiological properties of regionally distinct GABAA receptors are of great interest because drugs that target specific receptor subtypes may offer potential therapeutic advantages.

GABAA receptors that contain the {alpha}5 subunit are of particular interest because these receptors have been strongly implicated in cognitive processes such as learning and memory. Genetically modified mice lacking the GABAA receptor {alpha}5 subunit have better hippocampal-dependent learning than those with the subunit (Collinson et al. 2002Go). Furthermore, expression of the {alpha}5 subunit is unexpectedly reduced in transgenic mice expressing a point mutation of the {alpha}5 subunit (H105R) (Crestani et al. 2002Go). These {alpha}5H105R mice show enhanced memory performance for trace fear conditioning. In addition, inverse agonists that selectively inhibit the activity of {alpha}5GABAA receptors improve memory performance in animal models (Chambers et al. 2003Go). On the basis of these results, compounds are now being developed that selectively inhibit {alpha}5GABAA receptor function for the purpose of enhancing cognition (Dawson et al. 2006Go; Sternfeld et al. 2004Go). An increase in {alpha}5GABAA receptor activity has been implicated in the memory-impairing properties of benzodiazepines and volatile and injectable anesthetics (Bai et al. 2001Go; Caraiscos et al. 2004bGo; Cheng et al. 2006Go). However, the mechanisms by which activation of {alpha}5GABAA receptors constrains learning and memory have not yet been elucidated.

The distinct cellular distribution of {alpha}5GABAA receptors may contribute to their unique effects on behavior. The {alpha}5GABAA receptor subunit has a highly restricted pattern of distribution, being predominantly expressed in hippocampal pyramidal neurons where it is incorporated into ~20% of all GABAA receptors (Sur et al. 1999Go). Immunocytochemical studies have revealed an abundance of the {alpha}5 subunit in the hippocampal CA1 region with lower levels of expression in CA2 and CA3 regions (Fritschy and Mohler 1995Go; Pirker et al. 2000Go; Serwanski et al. 2006Go; Sur et al. 1999Go; Wisden et al. 1992Go). Staining for the {alpha}5 subunit was homogenous across the dendritic and cell body regions of the hippocampal formation (Prenosil et al. 2006Go). The {alpha}5GABAA receptor also shows distinct expression patterns at the subcellular level. Immunofluorescence studies with light microscopy have shown that {alpha}5GABAA receptors are primarily expressed in the extrasynaptic regions of pyramidal neurons (Brunig et al. 2002Go; Christie et al. 2002Go; Crestani et al. 2002Go). Higher-resolution electron microscopy studies have shown that some {alpha}5GABAA receptors are located in the peri-synaptic and synaptic regions of cultured pyramidal neurons (Serwanski et al. 2006Go). The reasons for and physiological importance of this pattern of subcellular distribution of {alpha}5GABAA receptors are unknown.

Increasing evidence indicates that distinct subpopulations of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors generate a persistent tonic inhibition, whereas synaptic receptors generate inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (Semyanov et al. 2004Go). A tonic GABAergic conductance has been identified in hippocampal pyramidal neurons in both dissociated cell culture (Bai et al. 2001Go; Caraiscos et al. 2004bGo) and slice models (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo; Maguire et al. 2005Go; Stell and Mody 2002Go). We previously showed that the tonic conductance in pyramidal neurons is predominantly generated by GABAA receptors that contain the {alpha}5 subunit (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo). Studies using neonatal mouse and rat hippocampal slices role have confirmed that extrasynaptic {alpha}5GABAA receptors generate a tonic conductance in pyramidal neurons (Cheng et al. 2006Go; Glykys and Mody 2006Go; Marchionni et al. 2007Go; Prenosil et al. 2006Go). In contrast, {alpha}5GABAA receptors do not make a major contribution to GABA-mediated synaptic currents as indicated by the lack of difference in miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents between {alpha}5 subunit knock out neurons ({alpha}5–/–) and WT neurons (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo).

Few studies to date have investigated the effects of reduced {alpha}5GABAA receptor function on the excitability of mature hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Field recordings in the CA3 pyramidal layer have revealed differences in the frequency of spontaneous single-population "spike-like events" in slices from {alpha}5–/– mice and control mice (Glykys and Mody 2006Go). Spontaneous epileptiform bursts were observed in slices from {alpha}5–/– mice but not controls unless the extracellular concentrations of K+ or Mg2+ were altered. A residual tonic conductance identified in {alpha}5–/– pyramidal neurons was generated, in part, by {delta} subunit-containing GABAA receptors (Scimemi et al. 2005Go). Others have studied gamma frequency oscillations evoked by the application of kainate in {alpha}5–/– and WT slices (Towers et al. 2004Go). The power of the gamma oscillations was greater in {alpha}5–/– than in WT slices, and interventions aimed at increasing the extracellular concentration of GABA were more effective at reducing the power of gamma oscillations in WT than in {alpha}5–/– slices. Pharmacological block of {alpha}5-mediated tonic inhibition altered the frequency of action potential firing in CA1 pyramidal neurons from rat slice (Marchionni et al. 2007Go). However, a detailed analysis of the mechanistic basis for {alpha}5GABAA receptor regulation of pyramidal cell excitability that impacts network oscillation and memory behavior has not been reported.

The results summarized in the preceding text raise several fundamental questions that must be answered if we are to understand how tonic inhibition regulates hippocampal function. Do {alpha}5GABAA receptors alter the minimal depolarizing current required to generate an action potential or rheobase in pyramidal neurons? Does the residual tonic inhibitory conductance in {alpha}5–/– pyramidal neurons or some other unidentified factor fully compensate and hence normalize pyramidal cell firing? Deletion of a gene that encodes a GABAA subunit that underlies a tonic inhibitory conductance does not necessarily lead to alteration in neuronal excitability. For example, cerebellar-specific {alpha}6{delta} subunit-containing GABAA receptors generate a tonic conductance (Brickley et al. 1996Go). The tonic conductance is reduced in cerebellar neurons from {alpha}6 null mutant mice; nevertheless, neuronal excitability is unchanged due to a compensatory increase in voltage-dependent K+ conductance (Brickley et al. 2001Go). Thus it is important to determine if selective reduction in the function of {alpha}5GABAA receptors (by either genetic manipulations or pharmacological inhibition) increase the intrinsic excitability of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Finally, does selective activation of {alpha}5GABAA receptors in neurons cause membrane hyperpolarization or shunting inhibition? These questions were addressed using patch-clamp recordings from pyramidal neurons in dissociated cultures and hippocampal slices.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Hippocampal cell culture and slice preparation

The experiments reported here were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Toronto. All experiments were conducted with hippocampal tissue harvested from {alpha}5–/– or WT mice. The generation of the {alpha}5–/– mice has been previously described (Collinson et al. 2002Go). Briefly, all mice were of mixed genetic background (approximately half C57/BL6 and half 129SvEv), and {alpha}5–/– and WT mice were generated by crossing {alpha}5+/– mice. Cultures of hippocampal neurons were prepared as previously described (MacDonald et al. 1989Go) from {alpha}5–/– mice and WT littermates on postnatal day 1. Mice were killed by decapitation. Cells were maintained in culture for 14–21 days before recordings. Extracellular solutions for cultured neurons contained (in mM): 140 NaCl, 1.3 CaCl2, 2.0 KCl, 25 HEPES, and 33 glucose; the pH was adjusted to 7.4 with 10 N NaOH and the osmolarity adjusted to 300–310 mosM with sucrose. The extracellular solution was applied to neurons by a computer-controlled multi-barreled perfusion system (SF-77B; Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT).

Hippocampal slices were prepared from 3- to 6-wk-old WT and {alpha}5–/– mice as previously described (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo). Slices (350 µm) containing transverse hippocampal sections were placed in ice-cold oxygenated (95% O2-5% CO2) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (composition in mM: 124 NaCl; 3.0 KCl, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.6 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 D-glucose) adjusted to 300–310 mosM. The CA1 region was isolated from the CA3 region by a surgical cut. Studies were performed in a submerged chamber, and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons were visually identified using a microscope equipped with differential interference contrast infrared optics.

Electrophysiology

Data were acquired with a Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) controlled with pClamp 9.0 software (Molecular Devices) via a Digidata 1322 interface (Molecular Devices). Membrane capacitance was measured using the membrane test protocol in pClamp 9.0. Access resistance was monitored throughout the experiments by applying a brief 10-mV or 10-pA hyperpolarizing step during voltage- and current-clamp experiments, respectively. Cells were eliminated from further analysis if the access resistance changed by >20%. The liquid junction potential and pipette capacitance were corrected before establishing the whole cell configuration using pClamp 9.0 software. Patch pipettes were pulled from thin-walled borosilicate glass capillary tubes and had open tip resistances of 3–5 M{Omega} when filled with an intracellular solution that contained (in mM) 140 CsCl, 10 HEPES, 10 EGTA, 4 Mg-ATP, 1 CaCl2, and 5 QX-314. The pH was adjusted to 7.3 with CsOH and the osmolarity was adjusted to 295–305 mosM. Whole cell currents were recorded with the holding potential clamped at –60 mV except when indicated otherwise. We restricted our study to pyramidal neurons to measure the influence of {alpha}5GABAA receptor activity on neuronal excitability. Although a tonic GABAergic conductance has been identified in stratum radiatum and s. oriens interneurons from guinea pig hippocampi (Semyanov et al. 2003Go) and in murine dentate gyrus granule cells (Stell et al. 2003Go), it was primarily mediated by GABAA receptors that did not contain the {alpha}5 subunit. The neuron cultures used in this study contained a heterogeneous population of neurons and glia cells. We selected pyramidal neurons on the basis of morphology. The pyramidal neurons selected were 15–20 µm in diameter with prominent apical dendrites and pyramidal somas. The duration of the action potential, as measured by the spike half-width, is a defining functional characteristic that distinguishes pyramidal cells from other cell types in the hippocampus. Pyramidal neurons generate action potentials with longer durations than those generated by interneurons (Lacaille et al. 1987Go). Accordingly, we restricted our study population to pyramidal neurons that generated action potentials with half-widths >1 ms.

Perforated-patch recordings were performed in some experiments by including gramicidin D (Sigma-Aldrich Canada, Oakville, ON, Canada) in the patch pipettes. The pipette solution contained (in mM) 150 K-gluconate and 10 HEPES with the pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH. The osmolarity of the solution was adjusted to 290–300 mosM with sucrose. Gramicidin stock solution (10 mg/ml in methanol) was diluted in K-gluconate solution to a final concentration of 50–100 µg/ml just before the experiment. The tip of the patch pipette was filled with a gramicidin-free K-gluconate solution and was backfilled with the gramicidin-containing solution. A high-resistance (G{Omega}) seal was formed between the electrode and the cell membrane by applying gentle suction after the pipette touched the cell. The electrode was voltage clamped at –60 mV, and membrane perforation was monitored by applying 10-mV hyperpolarizing pulses every 20 s. A perforated-patch with an access resistance of <30 M{Omega} was achieved within 30 min of establishing the G{Omega} seal. Capacitive transients, access resistance and leak conductance were carefully monitored throughout the experiments to confirm the stability of the perforated-patch. To further confirm patch stability, the membrane patch was ruptured at the end of the recording, which caused a sudden change in capacitance and access resistance. For current-clamp experiments, patch pipettes had open tip resistances of 4–6 M{Omega} when filled with an intracellular solution that contained (in mM) 145 K-gluconate, 5 Na-gluconate, 2 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 EGTA, 4 Mg-ATP, and 1 CaCl2 with the pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH and the osmolarity adjusted to 300–310 mosM with sucrose.

In all experiments the ionotropic glutamate antagonists 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (10 µM) and 2-amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid (40 µM) were added to the extracellular solution. In some experiments, tetrodotoxin (TTX; 300 nM; Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel) was added to the extracellular solution to block voltage-sensitive sodium channels. Aqueous stock solution of all drugs was prepared with distilled water except for L-655,708 (Tocris, Ellisville, MO), which was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide. Concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide equivalent to those present in the drug solution did not affect the tonic or synaptic currents. All drugs and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Canada except where indicated otherwise.

Data analysis

Tonic current and spontaneous IPSCs (sIPSCs) were measured using voltage-clamp techniques. Voltage-clamp data were sampled at 10 kHz and low-pass filtered at 2 kHz using an 8-pole Bessel filter. The amplitude of the tonic current was measured as the difference in the holding current before and during application of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide (100 µM) (Bai et al. 2001Go). This reduction in holding current has been previously shown to not be a result of bicuculline inhibition of K+ channels (Bai et al. 2001Go). The root mean square (rms) of current noise was calculated from 30-s recorded segments that lacked miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) using MiniAnalysis 5.0 software (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA). Spontaneous IPSCs were recorded in the absence of TTX using a gap-free voltage-clamp protocol. To determine the amplitude and time course of the sIPSCs, 25–75 events were randomly selected from each recording and analyzed using MiniAnalysis software as previously described (Yeung et al. 2003Go). Decay of IPSCs was fitted with a double-exponential function, and a weighted time constant was used to compare groups. The decay was considered to be monoexponential when tau1 was similar to tau2 (within 10%) (Collinson et al. 2002Go).

Current-clamp recordings were used to measure resting membrane potential and evoked action potentials. Data were sampled at 50 kHz and low-pass filtered at 10 kHz using an 8-pole Bessel filter. A high sampling rate was employed to allow accurate determination of the time course of action potentials. The resting membrane potential was determined as the potential measured over a stable 5-s period. Membrane resistance, action potential threshold, and waveform of the action potentials were measured by applying 2-pA incremental current steps (250 ms at 0.8 Hz) with one current step per sweep. The action potential threshold was defined as the inflection point in the voltage preceding the action potential. The duration and frequency of the current steps were selected to minimize the opening of slowly activating voltage-gated conductances. Action potentials that occurred at current steps that were 0, 2, and 4 pA above the threshold were averaged off-line and analyzed with Clampfit 9.0 (Molecular Devices). The frequency of action potentials could not be compared when current steps of equal magnitude were applied because of genotypic differences in the firing threshold. Accordingly, the slope of the input-output relationship (the gain) was studied by means of current steps that varied in 20-pA increments. Starting at 40 pA below threshold and increasing to 60 pA above threshold (at 1 step per sweep), six 2-s current steps were applied at 0.05 Hz. Membrane resistance was calculated using linear regression to fit the relationship between membrane potential at subthreshold levels and current amplitude. The frequency of action potential firing at each current level was determined and the gain calculated with the equation frequency = slope · (injected current –threshold current) + frequency at threshold. The slope of this relationship (gain) was used for comparisons between genotypes.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 4 (Graphpad, San Diego, CA). Statistical comparisons used 2-tailed paired or unpaired Student t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc tests where appropriate. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. All data are shown as means ± SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
To determine whether the expression of {alpha}5GABAA receptors altered the passive properties of hippocampal pyramidal neurons grown in dissociated cultures, membrane capacitance and input resistance were measured in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons. Series resistance was typically <12 M{Omega} (9.6 ± 0.1 M{Omega}, n = 28). Membrane capacitance was similar in the two types of neurons (39.3 ± 1.6 pF, n = 16 vs. 37.8 ± 2.2 pF, n = 17; P > 0.05). In contrast, membrane resistance measured under current-clamp conditions was 1.6-fold greater in {alpha}5–/– than in WT neurons (370 ± 10 M{Omega}, n = 15 vs. 237 ± 8 M{Omega}, n = 15; P < 0.0001). Next, the amplitude of the tonic current in cultured pyramidal neurons was studied using whole cell voltage-clamp methods with CsCl-based intracellular fluid (ICF). The GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline (100 µM) was applied and the change in holding current (IHold) that was required to maintain the membrane potential at –60 mV was measured (Fig. 1A). Notably, a low-amplitude residual tonic conductance was detected in {alpha}5–/– neurons (WT: 11.4 pA ± 1.2, n = 13 vs. 5.3 ± 0.9 pA; n = 13; P < 0.05) as has been previously reported (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo). The change in IHold, normalized to membrane capacitance, was 2.6-fold greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (0.42 ± 0.05 pA/pF, n = 13 vs. 0.16 ± 0.02 pA/pF, n = 13,; P < 0.001; Fig. 1B). The percent contribution of the bicuculline-sensitive conductance to the total IHold was also considerably greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (14.8 ± 2.30%; n = 13 vs. 8.67 ± 1.70%, n = 13; P < 0.05; Fig. 1B). The current noise was greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons as indicated by the rms of IHold ({sigma}: 3.74 ± 0.11 pA, n = 10 vs. 3.39 ± 0.10 pA, n = 10; P < 0.05). During the application of bicuculline, the rms noise of IHold was similar in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (100 µM; {sigma}: 3.08 ± 0.16 pA, n = 10 vs. 3.12 ± 0.09 pA, n = 10; P > 0.05). This latter finding indicated that under control conditions, the greater noise in WT neurons was attributable to activation of GABAA receptors.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Increased tonic GABAergic current in cultured wild-type (WT) neurons. A: sample traces show a shift in the holding current during an application of the GABAergic antagonist bicuculline (BIC; 100 µM), which reveals a persistent inward GABAergic current. B: average tonic conductance (left) recorded in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (normalized to membrane capacitance) shows a larger tonic current in WT (n = 13) than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 13; P < 0.005). The tonic current contributes a larger proportion of the total holding current at –60 mV (right) in WT neurons than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (P < 0.05). C: resting membrane potential (Vm) of cultured pyramidal neurons was sensitive to modulation of {alpha}5GABAA receptor activity. Using a K-gluconate ICF, GABA hyperpolarized Vm (n = 8; P < 0.01), whereas picrotoxin (PTX; n = 6; P < 0.05) and L-655,708 (L6; n = 4; P < 0.05) depolarized Vm in WT neurons. The Vm of {alpha}5–/– neurons was insensitive to GABA (n = 8), PTX (n = 5) or L6 (n = 4; P > 0.05).

 
Activation of {alpha}5GABAA receptors alters membrane potential

The resting membrane potential (Vm) was measured after formation of the whole cell configuration using current-clamp methods with a K-gluconate-based ICF to maintain low intracellular chloride concentrations. Resting membrane potential was similar in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (–61.7 ± 0.7 mV, n = 16 vs. –62.1 ± 0.5 mV, n = 17; P > 0.05). To examine the contribution of GABAA receptors to Vm, picrotoxin was added to the extracellular solution (Fig. 1C). Picrotoxin (100 µM), depolarized the WT neurons by 2.67 ± 1.02 mV (n = 6, P < 0.05), whereas the change in the Vm of {alpha}5–/– neurons (0.40 ± 0.51 mV) was not significant (n = 5; P > 0.05). To study the specific contribution of {alpha}5GABAA receptors, the {alpha}5 subunit-selective inverse agonist, L-655,708 was applied. A previous study showed that L-655,708 (50 µM) attenuated a tonic conductance in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, whereas postsynaptic inhibitory currents were unaffected (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo). L-655,708 (20 µM) depolarized WT neurons by 2.25 ± 0.48 mV (n = 4; P < 0.01), whereas no change in Vm was detected in {alpha}5–/– neurons (0.00 ± 0.41 mV change, n = 4; P > 0.05; Fig. 1C). Picrotoxin and L-655,708 produced a similar change, which suggests that GABAergic regulation of Vm is primarily determined by the tonic conductance under the current experimental conditions.

GABAA receptors that generate a tonic conductance have a higher affinity for GABA than those that underlie inhibitory postsynaptic currents (Semyanov et al. 2004Go). {alpha}5GABAA receptors show intermediate GABA sensitivity (EC50 value of 19 µM), which permits these receptor to respond to low, ambient concentrations of transmitter (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo). In the preceding experimental conditions, no exogenous GABA was applied, and the extracellular concentration of GABA was unknown. The brain concentration of GABA in the extracellular space, measured with microdialysis techniques, ranges from 0.1 to 2.9 µM (Attwell et al. 1993Go; Lerma et al. 1986Go; Tossman et al. 1986Go). To mimic physiological conditions, Vm was measured during an application of GABA (1 µM). GABA consistently hyperpolarized the WT neurons by –2.75 ± 0.70 mV (n = 8; P < 0.01), whereas no hyperpolarization was detected in {alpha}5–/– neurons (0.63 ± 0.38 mV, n = 8; P > 0.05). The hyperpolarizing response in WT neurons was consistent with a GABA-induced increase in chloride influx.

GABA hyperpolarizes WT but not {alpha}5–/– neurons

We next determined whether a deficit of {alpha}5GABAA receptors was associated with an alteration in the electrochemical gradient for chloride ions under resting conditions. The intracellular concentration of chloride ions in hippocampal pyramidal neurons changes during neuronal maturation because of an increase in the expression of the potassium-chloride co-transporter, KCC2 (Attwell et al. 1993Go; Lerma et al. 1986Go; Rivera et al. 1999Go). In immature hippocampal neurons, low levels of KCC2 result in a depolarizing chloride gradient. After 13–14 days in vitro, KCC2 protein levels increase and the chloride gradient becomes hyperpolarizing (Khirug et al. 2005Go). The firing of action potentials can also alter intracellular chloride concentrations on a short time scale (Woodin et al. 2003Go). To minimize the perturbation of the chloride gradient and the washout of intracellular macromolecules, we made perforated-patch recordings using the ionophore gramicidin D (Fig. 2A). During formation of the perforated-patch, the membrane was voltage clamped at –60 mV. Series resistance after formation of the perforated-patch was typically <20 M{Omega} (18.6 ± 1.3 M{Omega}; n = 12). GABA (10 µM) was applied using a rapid perfusion system and the holding potential was increased from –40 to –100 mV in 10-mV steps. The reversal potential for the GABA-evoked current was estimated by constructing a current-to-voltage plot and calculating the x intercept (Fig. 2B). The GABA current showed a reversal potential consistent with a hyperpolarizing chloride conductance and outward rectification as previously described for GABAA receptors (Curmi et al. 1993Go). No difference was detected in reversal potential for WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (–82.8 ± 3.1 mV, n = 7 vs. –79.6 ± 5.2 mV, n = 5 respectively, P > 0.05; Fig. 2C).


Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. GABA evoked current is hyperpolarizing in cultured WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons. The resting membrane potential and reversal potential for current evoked by GABA current were measured in cultured hippocampal pyramidal neurons from WT and {alpha}5–/– mice using gramicidin perforated-patch. A: sample recordings of current evoked by an application of GABA (10 µM) at several holding potentials. B: maximum GABA-evoked current recorded at various holding potentials is shown. The reversal potential, defined as the holding potential at which GABA evoked no net current, is indicated by the dotted line. C: resting membrane potential and reversal potential of GABA-evoked current was similar in WT neurons (n = 3) and {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 3; P > 0.05).

 
The perforated-patch technique was also used to measure Vm. No difference in Vm was detected between WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (–63.2 ± 1.4 mV, n = 7 vs. –62.9 ± 1.6 mV, n = 5; P > 0.05; Fig. 2C). Notably, the resting Vm measured using either whole cell or perforated-patch techniques did not differ in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (Fig. 1C). Together, the results show that an increase in {alpha}5GABAA receptor function causes an influx of chloride ions and membrane hyperpolarization in cultured pyramidal neurons.

{alpha}5GABAA receptors regulate excitability of pyramidal neurons

A primary measure of neuronal excitability is the magnitude of the depolarizing input required to trigger an action potential or rheobase. The excitability of WT and {alpha}5–/– hippocampal pyramidal neurons was compared by applying depolarizing steps (2 pA for 250 ms at 0.8 Hz; Fig. 3A). To minimize series resistance, experiments were performed using the whole cell patch-clamp technique. To maintain the gradient for chloride ions close to physiological values for mature neurons, a potassium gluconate-based intracellular solution was used in the recording electrode. The amplitude of the depolarizing current was increased until an action potential was detected in response to three successive depolarizing steps. The current required to generate the first action potential was recorded as the threshold current.


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Picrotoxin occluded the difference in excitability in cultured WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons. The amplitude of the depolarizing current required to generate action potentials was determined in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons. A: sample recordings illustrate that the magnitude of excitatory current (more depolarizing current steps) required to trigger an action potential was greater in WT neurons than {alpha}5–/– neurons (left). The depolarizing current that generated action potentials is indicated below each sample trace. The application of picrotoxin (PTX; 1 µM) reduced the magnitude of depolarizing current in WT neurons but not {alpha}5–/– neurons (right). B: magnitude of current required to trigger an action potential (normalized to membrane capacitance) was greater in WT neurons (n = 15) than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 14; P < 0.001). The depolarizing current required to activate an action potential was similar after the application of PTX (WT: n = 6 vs. {alpha}5–/–: n = 6; P > 0.05).

 
The absolute current required to generate an action potential was almost twofold greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (100.4 ± 12.0 pA; n = 15 vs. 56.6 ± 7.4 pA; n = 14; P < 0.05). The current required to generate an action potential, normalized to cell capacitance was 1.6-fold greater in WT neurons than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (2.63 ± 0.31 pA/pF, n = 15 vs. 1.61 ± 0.19 pA/pF, n = 14; P < 0.0001; Fig. 3B). Notably, the membrane potential at which action potentials fired was similar in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (–42.7 ± 1.6 mV, n = 9 vs. –42.4 ± 1.3 mV, n = 10; P > 0.05). To determine whether changes in voltage-dependent sodium and potassium conductances that generated the action potential contributed to the increased excitability of {alpha}5–/– neurons, the characteristics of the action potentials and afterhyperpolarizating responses were studied. No differences were detected in the frequency or waveform of action potentials recorded in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons: the peak amplitude, rise time, decay time, and afterhyperpolarization amplitude were similar (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Action potential characteristics

 
Excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices is similar to that of cultured neurons

Neurons grown in dissociated culture express a complement of GABAA receptors similar to that observed in vivo (Brunig et al. 2002Go). However, cell cultures lack the complex architecture and synaptic connectivity of hippocampal slices. Consequently, we next studied neuronal excitability in mature CA1 pyramidal neurons in slices prepared from 4-wk-old {alpha}5–/– and WT mice. A K-gluconate-based ICF was employed to maintain low intracellular chloride concentrations. Series resistance for the recordings was 20.4 ± 1.3 M{Omega} (n = 11). Membrane capacitance was similar in WT neurons and {alpha}5–/– neurons (32.8 ± 2.54 pF, n = 6 vs. 30.9 ± 3.61 pF, n = 5; P > 0.05). The resting membrane potential was also similar in WT neurons and {alpha}5–/– neurons (–60.8 ± 1.0 mV, n = 6 vs. –61.0 ± 1.3 mV, n = 5; P > 0.05). Notably, the Vm was similar to that measured in cultured neurons. The depolarizing current required to generate an action potential was twofold greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (1.91 ± 0.15 pA/pF, n = 6 vs. 1.05 ± 0.36 pA/pF, n = 5; P < 0.05). The amplitude of excitatory current required to generate action potentials in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons was similar for neurons studied in cell cultures and brain slices. These findings indicate that the cell culture model reflects the properties of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors in hippocampal slices. The culture preparation offers more effective concentration clamp and drug solution exchange conditions than brain slices. Thus the remaining pharmacological experiments were conducted using cultured neurons.

WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons differ in sensitivity to GABAA receptor blockade

Unidentified compensatory changes can occur after the genetic deletion of proteins that critically regulate neuronal excitability. We next addressed whether the enhanced excitability of {alpha}5–/– pyramidal neurons was due to alterations in the activity of GABAA receptors alone. We reasoned that the difference in excitability between {alpha}5–/– and WT neurons should be occluded by an application of picrotoxin provided no compensatory changes, independent of GABA function, occurred after deletion of the {alpha}5GABAA receptor subunit. Picrotoxin (100 µM) abolished the differences in excitability between WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons resulting in a similar amplitude of the depolarizing current required to generate action potentials (1.83 ± 0.31 pA/pF, n = 6 vs. 1.50 ± 0.31 pA/pF, n = 5; P > 0.05; Fig. 3B). Notably, in WT neurons, picrotoxin reduced the current required to generate an action potential to 71.6 ± 6.3% of control (n = 6, P < 0.05 vs. control) but had no effect in {alpha}5–/– neurons (94.8 ± 3.0% of control, n = 5, P > 0.05 vs. control; P < 0.05 vs. WT; Fig. 3A). These results suggest that a GABAergic conductance is primarily responsible for differences in the excitability of WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons.

To further ensure that the difference in current required to generate action potentials was attributable to reduced expression of {alpha}5GABAA receptors, we tested the effect of the {alpha}5GABAA receptor-selective inverse agonist L-655,708 (20 µM; Fig. 4A). In WT neurons, L-655,708 reduced the depolarizing current to 76.0 ± 7.0% of control (n = 4, P < 0.05 vs. control), whereas L-655,708 was ineffective in {alpha}5–/– neurons (95.7 ± 3.7% of control, n = 4; P > 0.05 vs. control; P < 0.05 vs. WT; Fig. 4B). The similarity in the effects of L-655,708 and picrotoxin in reducing the current required to generate an action potential in WT but not {alpha}5–/– neurons suggests that the {alpha}5GABAA receptor-mediated tonic conductance is a primary determinant by which GABAergic inhibition regulates the excitability of pyramidal neurons.


Figure 4
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. GABAA receptor antagonists modify the excitability of cultured WT but not {alpha}5–/– neurons. A: sample traces of current-clamp recordings from WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons show the magnitude of excitatory current required to trigger action potentials in the presence of GABAergic drugs. The depolarizing current that generated action potentials is indicated below each sample trace. WT neurons were highly sensitive to GABAergic modulation with the {alpha}5GABAA receptor selective inverse agonist L-655,708 (L6; 20 µM) reducing the current required and application of a low GABA concentration (1 µM) greatly increasing the current required to generate action potentials. Conversely, {alpha}5–/– neurons were much less sensitive to these GABAergic drugs. B: graph summarizes the changes in current required to generate an action potential after drug treatment. Note that the data are normalized to control. Picrotoxin (PTX; 1 µM) reduced the firing threshold in WT neurons (n = 6; P < 0.05 vs. control) but not {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 5; P > 0.05 vs. control; P < 0.05 WT versus {alpha}5–/– neurons). L655-708 also reduced the firing threshold current in WT neurons (n = 4; P < 0.05 vs. control) but not {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 4; P > 0.05 vs. control; P < 0.01 WT vs. {alpha}5–/–). An application of exogenous GABA increased the firing threshold in both WT neurons (n = 8; P < 0.01 vs. control) and {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 8; P > 0.05 vs. control) but had greater effect on WT neurons (P < 0.01 WT vs. {alpha}5–/–).

 
Low concentrations of GABA further distinguish {alpha}5–/– and WT neurons

We next addressed whether an increase in the concentration of GABA to physiological levels would further distinguish the firing patterns of WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons. GABA (1 µM) was added to the extracellular solution, and the magnitude of the depolarizing current required to generate an action potential was determined (Fig. 4A). GABA (1 µM) increased the current required to generate action potentials by >40% in WT neurons (141.9 ± 8.1% of control, n = 8, P < 0.01) but by only 9% in {alpha}5–/– neurons (108.8 ± 3.4% of control, n = 7, P < 0.05; Fig. 4B). Thus low concentrations of GABA increase the action potential threshold current of WT neurons ~4.5 times more efficaciously than was the case for {alpha}5–/– neurons (WT vs. {alpha}5–/– neurons, P < 0.01). These results suggest that extracellular GABA, acting through {alpha}5GABAA receptors, is capable of strongly regulating the excitability of pyramidal neurons.

Spontaneous IPSCs in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons

It has been previously reported that {alpha}5GABAA receptors increase the amplitude of spontaneous TTX-sensitive IPSCs (sIPSCs) recorded in hippocampal slices from 14- to 32-day-old mice (Collinson et al. 2002Go). We previously demonstrated that {alpha}5GABAA receptors do not contribute to mIPSCs, which are thought to be purely synaptic events (Caraiscos et al. 2004bGo). However, it is possible that a larger release of transmitter from presynaptic terminals recruits extrasynaptic receptors through spillover from neighboring synapses (Semyanov et al. 2003Go). Here, sIPSCs were recorded in cultured hippocampal pyramidal neurons in the absence of TTX (Fig. 5A). To facilitate detection of GABAergic events, a CsCl-based ICF was employed to raise the chloride reversal potential to approximately –3 mV. The frequency of sIPSC was similar in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (0.70 ± 0.05 Hz, n = 7 vs. 0.76 ± 0.05 Hz, n = 7; P > 0.05; Fig. 5B). The time constant of sIPSC decay was also similar between WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (43.3 ± 3.76 ms, n = 7 vs. 47.6 ± 2.9 ms, n = 7, P > 0.05; Fig. 5C). Finally, the amplitude of sIPCSs was similar in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (519 ± 137 pA, n = 7 vs. 530 ± 180 pA, n = 7; P > 0.05). Spontaneous IPSCs were also recorded in WT and {alpha}5–/– CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices. L-655,708 (20 µM) was added to the perfusate to further determine the contribution of {alpha}5GABAA receptors to synaptic events. No differences in sIPSC amplitude, kinetics or frequency were detected between genotypes under control conditions or following an application of L-655,708 (Table 2). These data suggest that {alpha}5GABAA receptors do not contribute appreciably to the amplitude or duration of sIPSCs in cultured neurons. Alternatively, another subpopulation of receptors might fully compensate for the {alpha}5GABAA receptors.


Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Deletion of {alpha}5GABAA receptors does not modify spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in cultured pyramidal neurons. A: sample trace of spontaneous IPSCs (sIPSCs) recorded in cultured WT neurons and {alpha}5–/– neurons. B: normalized cumulative distribution of the frequency of sIPSCs is shown. No difference was detected between currents recorded in WT (n = 7) and {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 7, P > 0.05). C: normalized cumulative distribution curves of the decay time of sIPSC were similar for currents recorded in WT neurons (n = 7) and {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 7, P > 0.05).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Properties of spontaneous IPSCs recorded in CA1 pyramidal neurons in hippocampal slices

 
{alpha}5GABAA receptors do not influence the gain of the input-output relationship

A change in the firing rates of neurons in response to sustained depolarizing input provides a measure of neuronal excitability. It has been previously demonstrated that during tonic excitation, shunting inhibition does not change the slope or "gain" of the relationship (Brickley et al. 1996Go; Chance et al. 2002Go). The input (depolarizing current) to output (action potential frequency) relationship was assessed in WT and {alpha}5–/– pyramidal neurons by injecting sustained, suprathreshold current steps (Fig. 6A). The input-output relationships were linear, and the slopes were compared between WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (Fig. 6B). Threshold current was significantly greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (106 ± 19 pA, n = 12 vs. 69 ± 10 pA, n = 12; P < 0.01), but the frequency of action potentials at the threshold current was similar (2.67 ± 0.43 vs. 2.58 ± 0.50 Hz, n = 12; P > 0.05). The slope for the input-output relationship was similar in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons (0.244 ± 0.001 Hz/pA, n = 12 vs. 0.252 ± 0.011 Hz/pA, n = 12; P > 0.05; Fig. 6B). These data confirm that tonic inhibition generated by {alpha}5GABAA receptors does not alter the gain of the input-output relationship.


Figure 6
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. {alpha}5GABAA receptors do not regulate the frequency of action potentials in cultured neurons. The input-output relationship between the stimulus intensity and frequency of action potentials in WT and {alpha}5–/– hippocampal pyramidal neurons is shown. A: sample traces of action potentials recorded in WT and {alpha}5–/– neurons in response to injection of depolarizing current steps. The depolarizing steps were increased in 20-pA increments after the firing of the 1st potential. B: relationship between the excitatory input frequency and frequency of action potentials is similar for potentials recorded in WT neurons (n = 12) and {alpha}5–/– neurons (n = 12; P > 0.05).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study provides direct evidence that {alpha}5GABAA receptors regulate the firing of action potentials in pyramidal neurons. Notably, the magnitude of depolarizing current required to trigger action potentials was greater in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons. The absence of {alpha}5GABAA receptors did not alter the gain or frequency of action potential firing during a prolonged depolarizing pulse. Furthermore, reduced expression of {alpha}5GABAA receptors did not influence spontaneous inhibitory synaptic transmission. Thus a tonic conductance generated by {alpha}5GABAARs contributes to the lower excitability of WT neurons relative to that of {alpha}5–/– neurons. These in vitro findings are consistent with behavioral studies indicating that reduced expression of {alpha}5GABAA receptor is not fully compensated in {alpha}5–/– mice (Cheng et al. 2006Go; Collinson et al. 2002Go).

Adaptive changes in {alpha}5–/– neurons

Picrotoxin did not alter the excitability of {alpha}5–/– neurons in the absence of exogenous GABA. This result is unexpected, as it suggests that under the current experimental conditions, tonic rather than synaptic GABAergic inhibition plays the predominant role in regulating excitability. Consistent with our results, charge transfer attributed to the tonic conductance is several times greater than that attributable to synaptic inhibition (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo; Hamann et al. 2002Go; Scimemi et al. 2005Go). Furthermore, {alpha}5–/– neurons fail to generate a fully compensatory or residual GABAergic conductance sufficient to depress excitability. The residual tonic conductance in {alpha}5–/– neurons (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo; Glykys and Mody 2006Go) could be generated by GABAA receptors that contain subunits other than {alpha}5 and or unidentified compensatory changes. It is unlikely to result from an increase in the number of {alpha}beta{gamma} subunit-containing GABAA receptors because the activity of [3H]Ro15-1788, a radioligand with high affinity to benzodiazepine sites of the {alpha}1-, {alpha}2-, {alpha}3-, and {alpha}5-containing receptors was reduced by 16% more in hippocampal membrane prepared from {alpha}5–/– mice than in the same tissue from WT mice (Collinson et al. 2002Go). This reduction is predicted from the proportion of {alpha}5GABAA receptors relative to other benzodiazepine-sensitive receptors in the hippocampus (Sur et al. 1999Go). A pharmacological study of {alpha}5–/– neurons showed that a residual tonic conductance is generated at least in part by {delta}GABAA receptors (Glykys and Mody 2006Go; Scimemi et al. 2005Go). GABAA receptors that exhibit constitutive opening might also contribute to the residual tonic conductance in pyramidal neurons (McCartney et al. 2007Go). However, for several reasons, it is unlikely that constitutively active {alpha}5GABAA receptors generate a sizeable tonic conductance in hippocampal neurons. First, neurons and glia grown in dissociated co-cultures release a soluble transmitter that activates a tonic GABAergic conductance (Valeyev et al. 1993Go;Vautrin et al. 2000Go). Several release mechanisms, including spillover of GABA from synapses, reverse operation of GABA transporters and nonvesicular release mechanisms, and calcium-independent release of transmitter contribute to the extracellular GABA (Kullmann et al. 2005Go). Second, we and others found that increasing the flow of extracellular solution to the surface of neurons rapidly and reversibly reduced the baseline current and fluctuation in the baseline noise (Bai et al. 2001Go). This change in holding current produced by changing the flow was eliminated by bicuculline. Fluctuation analysis showed that the variance in the baseline current signal was exponentially distributed with estimated kinetics comparable to those activated by submicromolar concentrations of exogenous GABA. The kinetics of channels activated by endogenous GABA displayed a potential sensitivity comparable to those activated by exogenous GABA (Bai et al. 2001Go). Finally, acutely isolated hippocampal pyramidal neurons did not generate a detectable tonic GABAergic current in the absence of exogenous GABA (Bai et al. 2001Go).

As mentioned in the INTRODUCTION, genetic deletion of a GABAA receptor subunit that contributes to a tonic conductance does not necessarily lead to altered neuronal excitability. Targeted deletion of the gene that encodes for the {alpha}6 subunit resulted in complete loss of {alpha}6{delta} subunits expressed on the surface of cerebellar granule neurons (Jones et al. 1997Go) and a reduction in tonic conductance (Brickley et al. 2001Go). However, the leak conductance, neuronal response to depolarizing current injection, and excitatory synaptic input were similar in {alpha}6–/– and WT neurons (Brickley et al. 2001Go). Adaptive changes were attributed to an increase in voltage-independent K+ conductance generated by TASK-1 channels. As well, Northern blot analysis of whole cerebella showed a 20% increase in TASK-1 messenger RNA in {alpha}6–/– mice. Reduced expression of postsynaptic GABAA receptors also resulted in adaptive changes in subunit expression. GABAA receptors containing the {alpha}1 subunit represent nearly half of the receptors in the brain (Kralic et al. 2002Go; McKernan and Whiting 1996Go) and are primarily localized to postsynaptic clusters (Sassoe-Pognetto et al. 2000Go). Deletion of the {alpha}1 subunit gene resulted in a marked reduction in the expression of GABAA receptors but only moderate behavioral changes. Adaptive changes in {alpha}1–/– mice include the reorganization of neuronal circuits and replacement of the {alpha}1 subunit with the {alpha}3 and {alpha}4 subunits (Kralic et al. 2006Go). In {alpha}1–/– cerebellar granule cells, a tonic conductance was increased by 62%, whereas the activity of the GABA transporter was reduced (Ortinski et al. 2006Go). Our results indicate that homeostatic mechanisms fail to fully compensate for a reduction in {alpha}5GABAA receptor activity as the excitability of {alpha}5–/– neurons is increased. Demonstrable compensatory changes in {alpha}6–/– and {alpha}1–/– neurons but not {alpha}5–/– pyramidal neurons indicate important regulatory differences in the production and trafficking of various GABAA receptor subunits. Also {alpha}5GABAA receptors appear to play a unique role in the hippocampus that is not substituted for by other GABAA receptor subtypes.

Pharmacological compounds that potentiated or inhibited the tonic conductance produced hyperpolarization or depolarization of WT neurons, respectively. These compounds had no demonstrable effect on {alpha}5–/– neurons even though a small residual tonic GABAergic current was present. Despite this residual conductance, the application of exogenous GABA failed to hyperpolarize {alpha}5–/– neurons. This may be attributed to high-affinity {delta}GABAA receptors that are thought to underlie the residual tonic conductance in {alpha}5–/– neurons (Scimemi et al. 2005Go). Saturation of a small population of {delta}GABAA receptors by ambient GABA would prevent further depolarization by exogenous GABA. Finally, the resting membrane potential was similar between genotypes. An inconsistency exists between the similarity in the resting membrane potential and difference in the picrotoxin-induced depolarizing current in WT but not {alpha}5–/– neurons. Several factors might account for this discrepancy. For example, there might be a difference in the resting membrane potential that we failed to detect because the difference was small and the sample size inadequate. However, we favor the explanation that there may have been no detectable difference in Vm because the permeability of the tonic anion channels is low relative to that of other ion species that determine Vm.

Synaptic inhibition and {alpha}5GABAA receptors

The contribution of {alpha}5GABAA receptors to synaptic transmission remains controversial. A subpopulation of these receptors is expressed in both the synaptic and the extrasynaptic regions of neurons (Serwanski et al. 2006Go) and may contribute to tonic and phasic GABAergic currents. There was no difference in the amplitude or kinetics of sIPSCs recorded in WT or {alpha}5–/– neurons. Consistent with this result, a previous report showed that miniature IPSCs, which result from the release of single quanta of transmitter and the exclusive activation of postsynaptic receptors, were not influenced by deletion of the {alpha}5 subunit (Caraiscos et al. 2004aGo; Cheng et al. 2006Go). Several studies have shown that {alpha}5GABAA receptors in cultured neurons do not contribute to synaptic transmission; however, the low density of neurons and the absence of glia from the cultures may prevent sufficient GABA from accumulating in the extracellular space. In hippocampal slices, rhythmic activity may cause the release of GABA from interneurons and activation of GABA receptors on neighboring neurons (Hamann et al. 2002Go; Scanziani 2000Go). Also nonvesicular release of GABA (Rossi et al. 2003Go) and reduced activity of GABA transporters contributes further to extracellular GABA (Semyanov et al. 2003Go). No change in the frequency, amplitude, or decay of sIPSCs in the CA1 and CA3 regions of hippocampal slices were detected from WT and {alpha}5–/– mice (Glykys and Mody 2006Go). Similarly, monosynaptically evoked IPSPs were similar in CA3 pyramidal neurons in slices from WT and {alpha}5–/– mice (Towers et al. 2004Go). Contrasting these results, a modest reduction in the amplitude of evoked IPSCs in hippocampal slices from {alpha}5–/– mice (87% of WT) has been reported (Collinson et al. 2002Go). Also a subpopulation of slowly activating sIPSCs that occur at low frequency in CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons were reported to be more numerous in WT than in {alpha}5–/– neurons (Glykys and Mody 2006Go). A study of diazepine-sensitive receptors that used single-, double-, and triple-mutant mice showed that {alpha}5GABAA receptors do not contribute to fast synaptic transmission on the soma or dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons, but perisynaptic {alpha}5GABAA receptors do contribute to slow IPSCs (Prenosil et al. 2006Go). Collectively, these results indicate that although a small proportion of {alpha}5GABAA receptors are expressed at synapses the total inhibitory charge transfer generated by synaptic {alpha}5GABAA receptors is negligible. Thus synaptic {alpha}5GABAA receptors may make a small contribution to network behavior, whereas extrasynaptic GABAA receptors appear to play a significant role.

Tonic inhibition and excitability

Activation of {alpha}5GABAA receptors caused only a modest hyperpolarization of WT pyramidal neurons. A tonic conductance can reduce excitability via shunting mechanisms that are independent of changes in membrane potential (Brickley et al. 1996Go; Mitchell and Silver 2003Go). Shunting inhibition influences the input-output activity of neurons by increasing the excitatory drive required to generate an action potential. Typically, shunting inhibition does not change the slope or gain of the input-output relationship when the neurons are stimulated by nonfluctuating excitatory input (Chance et al. 2002Go; Mitchell and Silver 2003Go). We showed that activation of {alpha}5GABAA receptors did not change the gain of the input-output relationship. These results indicate that {alpha}5GABAA receptors cause a robust shunting inhibition and only modest membrane hyperpolarization. However, it should be appreciated that we examined the impact of the tonic inhibitory conductance under experimental conditions where the level of excitatory input was persistent and low. Under more physiological conditions, excitatory input is greater and fluctuates widely because of transient activation of the postsynaptic receptors. The influence of a tonic inhibitory conductance on neuronal excitability with a fluctuating or "noisy" excitatory synaptic input has been studied previously by others using computer simulations and an in vitro cerebellar preparation (Mitchell and Silver 2003Go). Under these conditions, the effect of tonic inhibition on neuronal firing is nonlinear and depends on the nature of the excitatory synaptic input. A tonic shunt induced a change in both the gain and threshold of the action potential firing during noisy synaptic input. Such a change in the firing rate has been proposed to increase the storage capacity of the cerebellum (Hamman et al. 2002Go). In contrast to the results for the cerebellum, an increase in tonic inhibition in the hippocampus appears to reduce learning. Our behavioral studies suggest that an increase in {alpha}5GABAA receptor activity impairs performance for hippocampal-dependent memory tasks (Cheng et al. 2006Go).

Hippocampal gamma frequency oscillations have been proposed to underlie the encoding of spatial information and formation of episodic memory (Lisman 1999Go). In particular, it has been proposed that oscillations originating in CA1 and CA3 regions regulate cognition (Csicsvari et al. 2003Go). Several studies have investigated the function of tonic inhibition in CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurons in regulating network activity (Towers et al. 2004Go; Whittington et al. 1996Go). The role of {alpha}5GABAA receptors in modifying kainate-induced gamma oscillations (20–80 Hz) was investigated using hippocampal slices from WT and {alpha}5–/– mice (Towers et al. 2004Go). The power of network oscillations in response to increased excitatory drive was greater in hippocampal slices prepared from {alpha}5–/– mice than in those prepared from WT mice. Also the frequency range over which the oscillations occurred was lower, which resulted in very strong oscillations over a narrow bandwidth in the {alpha}5–/– slices. In addition, raising the extracellular concentration of GABA caused a greater reduction in the power of gamma oscillations in WT slices than in {alpha}5–/– slices. Computer simulation of a neuronal network indicated that reduced in tonic conductance in the dendritic membrane of the principal cells accurately reproduced the increased gamma power observed in {alpha}5–/– slices (Towers et al. 2004Go). The power of the gamma oscillations was dependent on membrane resistance and shunting inhibition, which is consistent with the results presented here. Hippocampal oscillations are capable of regulating the firing of pyramidal neurons (Cobb et al. 1995Go). Thus a complex interaction of synchronous network activity and individual neuronal activity exists in the hippocampus with both elements being regulated by tonic inhibition. Our data now offer realistic parameters that can be incorporated into computational models that further investigate hippocampal network synchrony.

In summary, we have shown that tonic inhibition in hippocampal pyramidal neurons regulates spike firing. Together with the results of previous studies, these findings raise the intriguin