JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 900-914, 2008. First published December 5, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00864.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/900    most recent
00864.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fong, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Potts, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fong, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Potts, J. T.

Neurokinin-1 Receptors Modulate the Excitability of Expiratory Neurons in the Ventral Respiratory Group

Angelina Y. Fong1,3 and Jeffrey T. Potts1,2

1Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center and 2Department of Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; and 3Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Submitted 3 August 2007; accepted in final form 2 December 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We studied the role of neurokinin-1 receptors (NK1-R) on the excitability of expiratory (E) neurons (tonic discharge, ETONIC; augmenting, EAUG; decrementing, EDEC) throughout the ventral respiratory group, including Bötzinger Complex (BötC) using extracellular single-unit recording combined with pressurized picoejection in decerebrate, arterially perfused juvenile rats. Responses evoked by picoejection of the NK1-R agonist, [Sar9-Met(O2)11]-substance P (SSP) were determined before and after the selective NK1-R antagonist, CP99,994. SSP excited 20 of 35 expiratory neurons by increasing the number of action potentials per burst (+33.7 ± 6.5% of control), burst duration (+20.6 ± 7.9% of control), and peak firing frequency (+16.2 ± 4.8% of control; means ± SE). Pretreatment with CP99,994 completely blocked SSP-evoked excitation in a subset of neurons tested, supporting the notion that SSP excitation was mediated through NK1-R activation. Because we had previously shown that EAUG neurons were crucial to locomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC), we reasoned that blockade of NK1-R would alter LRC by preventing somatic-evoked excitation of EAUG neurons. Blockade of NK1-Rs by CP99,994 in the BötC severely disrupted LRC and prevented somatic-evoked excitation of EAUG neurons. These findings demonstrate that LRC is dependent on endogenous SP release acting via NK1-Rs on EAUG neurons of the BötC. Taken together with our earlier finding that inspiratory off-switching by the Hering-Breuer Reflex requires endogenous activation of NK1-Rs through activation of NK1-Rs on EDEC neurons, we suggest that endogenous release of substance P in the BötC provides a reflex pathway-dependent mechanism to selectively modulate respiratory rhythm.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Respiratory rhythm is characterized by a coordinated pattern of motor outflow directed to the upper airway and diaphragm. This pattern of activity in vivo is characterized by a three-phase rhythm delineated as inspiration followed by a period of expiration that can be further subdivided into two phases: postinspiration and late expiration (Richter and Spyer 2001Go). Respiratory rhythm is continually modulated by a number of inputs including chemosensory drive from central and peripheral chemoreceptors, dynamic feedback from pulmonary and somatosensory afferents as well as local release of neuropeptides such as substance P (SP). Considerable attention has focused on the effect of SP on breathing in brain stem regions that predominately contain inspiratory neurons (Gray et al. 1999Go, 2001Go; Morgado-Valle and Feldman 2004Go; Ptak et al. 2000aGo). Neurons in pre-Bötzinger Complex (preBötC) of the ventral respiratory group (VRG) express high levels of the SP receptor, neurokinin-1 (NK1-R) (Gray et al. 1999Go; Guyenet et al. 2002Go; Nakaya et al. 1994Go; Wang et al. 2001Go). Ablation of NK1-R expressing neurons in preBötC, the putative kernel for respiratory rhythmogenesis (Smith et al. 1991Go), severely disrupts breathing and markedly depresses the ventilatory response to inspired CO2 (Gray et al. 2001Go; McKay et al. 2005Go; Wenninger et al. 2004Go). Earlier studies have shown that exogenous SP excites respiratory activity by increasing breathing frequency and tidal volume (Chen et al. 1990aGo; Gray et al. 1999Go; Hedner et al. 1984Go; Johnson et al. 1996Go; Monteau et al. 1996Go; Morgado-Valle and Feldman 2004Go; Ptak et al. 2000aGo). However, in a recent study, we showed that NK1-R activation could excite both inspiratory and expiratory activity depending on the VRG neuronal subtype activated (Fong and Potts 2006Go). Despite the central effect of SP on breathing, NK1-R do not appear to be essential for the generation of respiratory rhythm because genetic deletion of NK1-R or SP synthesizing neurons failed to alter basal breathing (Cao et al. 1998Go; De Felipe et al. 1998Go; Ptak et al. 1999Go; Telgkamp et al. 2002Go). These findings suggest that SP may be involved in modulating respiratory rhythm rather than in the generation of respiratory rhythm.

To date, no study has directly examined the role of NK1-R on expiratory (E) neurons in the VRG. Given that NK1-R are expressed in regions containing E neurons (Guyenet et al. 2002Go; Wang et al. 2001Go), it is reasonable to propose that SP evoked excitation of E neurons may provide a mechanism to modulate breathing. The present study was designed to test this prediction and to demonstrate that SP-induced excitation of E neurons in the VRG selectively modulates respiratory rhythm in a reflex pathway-dependent manner. Because reflex activation of E neurons contributes to changes in respiratory rhythm (Ezure et al. 2002Go; Fong and Potts 2006Go; Hayashi et al. 1996Go; Kubin et al. 2006Go; Potts et al. 2005Go) and respiratory rhythm can be coupled to locomotor activity via somatosensory-evoked excitation of expiratory neurons (Funk et al. 1992Go; Iscoe 1981Go; Potts et al. 2005Go), we hypothesized that locomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC) would require endogenous SP release in the VRG.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
All animals were handled in accordance with National Institute of Health and University of Missouri Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines.

In situ working heart-brain stem preparation

Experiments were performed on 39 juvenile male Wistar rats (55–120 g, Harlan) using the in situ arterial-perfused juvenile rat preparation. The surgical procedures and the extracorporeal circuit for this preparation have been described in detail previously (Fong and Potts 2006Go; Paton 1996Go; Potts et al. 2000Go). In brief, rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane via spontaneous inhalation, and the depth of anesthesia was gauged by the absence of limb withdrawal to noxious pinch and the lack of corneal reflex. The rat was transected subdiaphragmatically and the upper torso immediately submerged into ice-cold Ringer solution bubbled with carbogen gas (95% O2-5% CO2) and decerebrated precollicularly, and the cerebellum was removed to expose the dorsal surface of the brain stem. The preparation was skinned, and a portion of the posterior thoracic wall was removed to expose the heart and lungs. The descending aorta and the left phrenic nerve (PN) were blunt dissected, isolated, and cut. After the surgery, the preparation was transferred to an acrylic chamber and the thoracic aorta cannulated with a double lumen catheter (16 and 18 gauge; Braintree Scientific) and secured. Peristaltic pump perfusion of Ringer solution bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2 was started immediately, and the perfusate was warmed to 32–33°C using an in-line heat exchanger, pumped through two in-line bubble traps and a filter (polypropylene mesh; pore size: 40 µm, Millipore). Perfusion pressure was measured via one of the lumens of the double-lumen catheter using a pressure transducer (model PT300, Grass Instruments), connected to an amplifier (Model No. 13-6615-50, Gould). Pump flow rate was calibrated at the beginning of each experiment and flow rates between 25 and 36 ml/min were used in this study. Whole nerve activity was recorded from the PN via suction electrodes (tip diameter, 0.2–0.3 mm), amplified (20,000–50,000) and filtered (100 Hz to 3 kHz, Model No. P511, Grass Astro-Med), and sampled at 2.5 kHz. The electrocardiogram (ECG) was measured via silver wires placed directly on the heart, amplified (10,000–20,000), filtered (100 Hz to 3 kHz, Model No. P511; Grass Astro-Med), displayed on an oscilloscope and a discriminator circuit (Model N-750, Mentor) was used to generate transistor-transistor logic (TTL) pulses triggered from the upstroke of the R wave. Instantaneous heart rate was derived from measuring the interbeat interval and displayed as beats per minute (bpm).

The elapsed time from induction of anesthesia to the start of systemic perfusion was generally 10–15 min. Neuromuscular paralysis was produced by addition of vecuronium bromide (50 µg) directly to the perfusate. Only preparations that exhibited ramping phrenic discharge with regular burst intervals, an index of adequate brain stem perfusion (Paton 1996Go), were included in this study.

Extracellular recording of VRG neurons

Multibarrel glass micropipettes containing three to five barrels (1.2 mm OD, 0.68 mm ID, World Precision Instruments) were pulled and broken back to yield a total tip diameter of <10 µm for single-unit recording and picoejection or <30 µm for multiunit recording and microinjection. One barrel was filled with 3 M NaCl, and a silver wire was introduced into the NaCl solution for recording neuronal activity (electrode tip impedance: 12–28 M{Omega}). Extracellular recordings were amplified using an AC amplifier (5,000–10,000x; NeuroLog NL104, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and filtered (300 Hz to 3 kHz, Neurolog NL126, Digitimer). Action potentials (AP) were continuously monitored using a window discriminator (Neurolog NL201, Digitimer) using dual threshold windowing to capture both the trajectory and amplitude of each unit and displayed on a storage oscilloscope (20 mHz, Kikisui). For picoejection studies, only neurons the APs of which could be clearly discriminated were studied. Single-unit activity was digitized using 12 bit A/D conversion (micro 1401, Cambridge Electronics Design, Cambridge, UK) at 25 kHz and recorded using Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronics Design). The system recorded and displayed discriminated unit activity in real time. Wave-shape template matching was used off-line to confirm the waveshape of all recorded units as single units.

Drug preparation for picoejection or microinjection

The remaining drug barrels of the combined recording/picoejection microelectrode array were back-filled with one of the following solutions: 1 mM of the selective NK1-R agonist, [Sar9-Met(O2)11]-substance P (SSP); 10 mM of the selective nonpeptide NK1-R antagonist, CP99,994; vehicle (Ringer solution). In experiments designed to characterize the role of NK1-R in LRC, each barrel of a triple-barrel pipette was back-filled with 3 M NaCl (extracellular recording), CP99,994 (NK1-R antagonist), and D-L-homocysteic acid (DLH). DLH was used to functionally identify the BötC region as previously described (Fong and Potts 2006Go; Monnier et al. 2003Go; Wang et al. 2002Go). All drugs were dissolved in the Ringer solution and pH adjusted to 7.4. The ends of the microinjection barrels were sealed with silicone tubing connected to a pneumatic pressure injection system (Picospritzer II, General Valve) via polyethylene tubing.

Experimental procedure

The micropipette was secured to a pipette holder attached to a piezoelectric stepper motor (Inch Worm, model IW-711-01; Burleigh Instruments) driven by a low-noise controller (model 6200ULN-1-1; Burleigh Instruments) mounted on a stereotaxic frame. The tip of the micropipette was placed at calamus scriptorius (CS) using a stereomicroscope (total magnification = 66X, Stemi SV11, Carl Zeiss), and this landmark was used as relative zero for the rostrocaudal and lateral displacement of the micropipette array. The cranium was tilted nose down at an angle of ~30° from the horizontal such that the brain stem was horizontal. The pipette was positioned into the VRG using the following coordinates: AP: +0.3–1.8 mm, ML: ±1.4–2.0 mm from CS, DV: 1,800–2,700 µm below the dorsal surface of the medulla. Extracellular unit activity was continuously monitored as the micropipette was advanced ventrally into the medulla and the locations of respiratory neurons were noted. Once a respiratory neuron was located, the neuron was classified as decrementing-expiratory (EDEC), augmenting expiratory (EAUG), or tonic expiratory (ETONIC) based on its discharge pattern relative to phrenic nerve discharge (PND) (Ezure 1990Go). Following characterization of bursting profile of the expiratory neuron, the chosen protocol was used as described in the following text. The final stereotaxic location of recorded neurons was documented and subsequently plotted on a reconstruction of a representative rat brain stem of the weight range used in this study.

Protocol 1: effect of SSP picoejection on expiratory neurons

The first series of experiments determined the effect of SSP on excitability of single unit expiratory neurons in the VRG. To facilitate recording of single units during drug delivery to the recorded cell, picoejection pressure was maintained as low as possible (pressures range between 10 and 25 psi). Ejection pressure was slowly adjusted to the drug barrel until a minimum pressure that produced ~10% change in AP amplitude was achieved. In the majority of cases, this resulted in a decrease in AP amplitude. However, in two cases, AP amplitude increased during pressure application. The drugs were pressure-ejected over a 20- to 30-s period, which typically coincided with six to seven respiratory cycles while the amplitude of the recorded unit was constantly monitored. The ejection volumes could not be determined as the ejected volume was below the visual resolution of the microscope (3 nl).

To verify that the SSP-evoked response was, in fact, due to activation of NK1-R, the picoejection was repeated following delivery of CP99,994 (CP) from an adjacent barrel. Pressure transfer between picoejection barrels was facilitated by a series of four-way stopcocks that were connected in-series with the external pressure source. In preliminary studies, we determined that a minimum period of 1 min was required between repeat applications of SSP to prevent receptor desensitization and for the response to SSP to be reproducible (see Fig. 1A). Therefore to ensure sufficient time for recovery, ≥1 min was given between sequential SSP applications. In a subset of E neurons excited by SSP (n = 5), the nonpeptide NK1-R antagonist CP was picoejected onto the same neuron. Immediately following CP, SSP picoejection was repeated. Finally, SSP was picoejected serially over the next 10 min to examine recovery of the SSP response.


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Picoejection of [Sar9-Met(O2)11]-substance P (SSP) excites expiratory neurons via activation of NK1 receptors (NK1-R). A: picoejection of SSP on to an expiratory neuron elicited a large increase in instantaneous firing frequency that recovers back to pre-ejection level shortly after cessation of picoejection (A1). This excitation was reproducible and was blocked by prior picoejection of the selective NK1-R antagonist, CP99,994 (CP, A2). The response to SSP recovered following wash out of the antagonist (A3–A4). From top to bottom: instantaneous firing frequency (Inst. Freq), extracellular unit recording [ventral respiratory group (VRG) unit], integrated phrenic nerve discharge ({int}PND). B: waveform analysis of action potential trajectory before (baseline), during (SSP), and after (recovery) SSP picoejection from A1. These data confirm that this recording was from a single unit and that shape of the action potential was not affected by picoejection of SSP. The number of action potential shown in each overlay is indicated. C: quantification of the effect of picoejection of SSP alone or immediately after NK1-R antagonist, CP99,994. SSP alone resulted in an increase in the number of action potentials per burst (# APs), mean, and peak frequency. The effect of SSP was completely blocked in the presence CP99,994. * = P < 0.05, One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Student Newman-Keul (SNK), n = 5. Burst Dur, Burst duration; Mean freq, Mean frequency, Peak freq, Peak frequency.

 
Vehicle effects and pressure ejection artifacts were examined by pressure-ejection of Ringer solution onto a subset of respiratory neurons (n = 9) using pressures that produced a similar reduction (i.e., 10%) in AP amplitude. No change was detected in any of the measurements.

Protocol 2: effect of NK1-R antagonism on LRC

Somatic afferents innervating the forelimb were activated by electrical stimulation of the forelimb flexors as previously described (Potts et al. 2000Go, 2005Go). The ipsilateral scapula was stabilized using a vertebral clamp and the distal end of the forelimb attached to a force displacement transducer (FT-100, CB Science) with developed tension measured using a recorder amplifier (Neurolog NL107, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK). Stimuli were delivered using two fine silver wires (0.005-in OD, A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA) introduced into the biceps brachii and coracobrachialis muscle groups parallel to the humerus. Pulse-train stimuli (0.4–1.3 Hz, 50- to 75-ms train duration, 1- to 3-ms pulse duration, 250 µA to 1 mA) were generated by a stimulator (Model S88, Astro-Med Grass) and a stimulation isolation unit (Model PSIU6, Astro-Med Grass). This stimulus activated somatic afferents as evidenced by tachypnea and pressor/tachycardic responses (Potts et al. 2000Go, 2005Go).

Once the forelimb was stabilized, the multibarrel microelectrode (3 barrels, <30 µm total OD) was introduced into the VRG ipsilateral to the stimulated forelimb (CS: AP +1.6–1.8 mm, ML ±1.6–2.0 mm, depth from surface: 1,800–2,600 µm). Multiunit neuronal activity was recorded as the electrode was advanced ventrally. Once a region containing expiratory activity was located, the electrode was left in place for 10 min prior to microinjection of DLH (6 pmol in 6 nl) to functionally confirm that the electrode tip was in the BötC region as evidenced by an evoked bradypnea represented by an increase in expiratory duration of >1.5-fold of baseline for over five respiratory cycles (Fong and Potts 2006Go; Monnier et al. 2003Go; Wang et al. 2002Go). Following functional identification of the bradypneic region, the effect of somatic afferent stimulation on LRC was determined before and after blockade of NK1-R using CP99,994 (500 pmol in 50 nl).

Protocol 3: effect of NK1-R antagonism on somatic afferent stimulation evoked excitation of expiratory neurons

A multibarrel microelectrode for single-unit recording and picoejection of SSP and CP as described in protocol 1 was positioned into the VRG. Additionally, the forelimb was stabilized and stimulation electrodes were placed in the forelimb flexors as described for protocol 2. E neurons were examined for responsiveness to both picoejection of SSP and somatic afferent stimulation. Only neurons that were excited by both exogenous SSP and somatic afferent stimulation were used in this series of experiments. Once an E neuron that fitted the above profile was localized, CP was picoejected onto the neuron and the effect of somatic afferent stimulation was immediately repeated.

Data and statistical analyses

All data were collected on-line using commercially available data-acquisition hardware and software (micro1401 A/D converter, Spike 2 software, version 5.16; Cambridge Electronics Design). Wave-shape template matching algorithms (Spike2; Cambridge Electronic Design) was used off-line to confirm the shape of action potentials belonging to a single unit or to discriminate different units prior to analysis; all other analyses were performed off-line using custom-written scripts.

The following variables were measured from the phrenic neurogram: inspiratory duration (TI), determined as duration of PND; expiratory duration (TE) determined as the duration from the end of one PND to the onset of the following burst; respiratory cycle length (TTot)was calculated by summing TI and the subsequent TE; respiratory frequency was calculated from TTot and expressed in hertz. The latency between somatic afferent stimulation and the following PND was measured using a event correlation algorithm (Spike 2, V 5.16) over a series of somatic afferent stimulation events (generally 9–19 events).

For extracellular unit activity, the duration of each burst and the number of action potentials per burst was recorded and used to calculate the mean discharge frequency. In addition, the peak discharge frequency (determined from instantaneous firing frequency) was also recorded. Changes in neuronal activity in response to SSP or CP picoejection were expressed as percent of baseline. Baseline was determined by averaging the variables measured for 10–15 respiratory cycles immediately before drug ejection. Effect of the drug on extracellular activity was determined by averaging over all the respiratory cycles during picoejection (generally 6–7 respiratory cycles). Following drug ejection, the variables were measured over 10–15 respiratory cycles to determine recovery of neuronal activity toward baseline levels. This time frame was chosen based on preliminary experiments showing that this was sufficient for extracellular neuronal activity to recover to control values. Drug application was determined to have elicited an effect on the recorded neuron if the parameters measured during picoejection increased ≥15% above baseline.

All graphs were plotted using the software package SigmaPlot (version 9). All data are presented as means ± SE; n is the number of neurons, unless otherwise indicated. All statistical analysis was performed on raw data using the software program SAS (version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data that were normally distributed was test for statistical significance on the effect of drug on neuronal activity or PND parameters using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Student Newman-Keul (SNK) post hoc test. Data that were not normally distributed were evaluated using repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks followed by SNK post hoc test. The effect of somatic afferent stimulation on E neurons in the absence and presence of NK1-R blockade was determined using paired t-test. The effect of NK1-R blockade on respiratory rhythm entrainment was determined using Student's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant in all cases.

Solutions and drugs

The Ringer solution, containing (in mM) 125 NaCl, 24 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.25 MgSO4, 1.25 KH2PO4, and 1 D-glucose, was made fresh for each experiment. A high-molecular-weight compound (1.25%, Ficoll, type 70, 70 kDa, Sigma) was added to the Ringer solution as an oncotic agent with the resulting oncotic pressure of the perfusate of ~310 mosM/Kg H2O. The neuromuscular blocking agent, vecuronium bromide (0.04 µg/ml, Sicor Pharmaceuticals), was also applied to the perfusate.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Effect of SSP picoejection on expiratory neurons

Thirty-five E neurons located within the confines of the VRG were successfully recorded and included in the study. Picoejection of SSP excited 57% (20/35 cells) of E neurons, while the remaining 43% failed to alter their firing pattern. Table 1 summarizes the classification of E cells based on neuronal discharge subtype and summarizes their response to exogenous SSP. ETONIC neurons were the most commonly recorded and SSP excited 71% of these neurons. Fifty-five percent of EAUG neurons and 50% of EDEC neurons were also excited by SSP. One neuron whose activity spanned from late expiration to early inspiration was also excited by SSP. Exogenous application of SSP significantly increased the total number of APs per burst (15/20 cells), burst duration (8/20 cells), as well as the mean (9/20 cells) and peak (11/20 cells) firing frequency (see Table 2). We also evaluated the effect of SSP on respiratory rhythm and pattern and found that picoejection of SSP had no significant effect on inspiratory duration (TI), expiratory duration (TE), total respiratory cycle time (Ttot), or phrenic burst frequency (Table 3). These results suggest that the delivery of exogenous SSP was highly localized and predominately affected the recorded neuron while having little to no effect on other neighboring respiratory neurons.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Effect of [Sar9-Met(O2)11]-substance P (SSP) picoejection on expiratory neurons by neuronal subtype

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Response of expiratory neurons to picoejection of SSP

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Phrenic burst parameters before, during and after picoejection of SSP onto expiratory neurons

 
An example of the effect of SSP and CP on the excitability of an ETONIC is shown in Fig. 1. In this experiment, picoejection of SSP excited an extracellularly recorded single-unit neuron. However, the basal firing pattern was restored within two to three respiratory cycles following termination of SSP application. This excitatory pattern was repeated when SSP was reapplied 60 s later. CP completely blocked the excitation which was restored within 2 min following washout of the antagonist (Fig. 1A). In five ETONIC neurons where SSP produced a brisk excitation by increase in the mean and peak firing frequency and the total number of action potentials per burst (Fig. 1C), we examined the effect of NK1-R blockade. SSP evoked excitation was completely eliminated by pretreatment with CP. NK1-R blockade alone had no effect on the mean or peak firing frequency, number of APs per burst or burst duration of on these five ETONIC neurons (Table 4). The excitation by SSP was reproducible, prevented by selective blockade of NK1-Rs and was completely reversible following drug washout.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Response of tonic-expiratory neurons to picoejection of neurokinin-1 receptor blockade by CP99,994 (CP)

 
An example of the effect of SSP on an ETONIC neuron is shown in Fig. 2. This neuron had activity throughout the expiratory phase with no activity during the inspiratory phase (Fig. 2, A and B). Picoejection of SSP increased peak firing frequency that recovered rapidly following cessation of SSP picoejection (Fig. 2A). SSP picoejection increased the number of APs generated per burst with the burst duration of each burst occurring later in the expiratory cycle (Fig. 2D). SSP significantly increased mean and peak firing frequency, number of APs per burst, and burst duration on this subpopulation of E neurons (Fig. 2E).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Picoejection of SSP excites tonically discharging expiratory neurons (ETONIC). A: picoejection of SSP (thick horizontal line) resulted in an increase in peak firing frequency. From top to bottom: Instantaneous firing frequency (Inst. Freq), extracellular unit recording (VRG unit), integrated phrenic nerve discharge ({int}PND). Horizontal dashed line is the peak discharge averaged over 10 respiratory cycles prior to picoejection. B: enlargement of a single respiratory cycle illustrating the activity of this ETONIC neuron throughout expiration. C: waveform analysis of the action potentials trajectories during baseline (blue) and SSP picoejection (red) during periods indicated by the blue and red horizontal lines in A. The waveform analysis confirmed that the recording was from the same single unit. The number of action potential shown in each overlay is indicated. D: average number of action potentials (5 respiratory cycles, 50-ms bins) during baseline (blue bars) and SSP picoejection (red bars) plotted in relation to PND, where time 0 is the onset of a phrenic burst. These data demonstrate the increase in unit discharge rate throughout expiration with prolonged discharge duration. E: quantification of the effect of SSP on ETONIC neurons (n = 9). SSP picoejection significantly increased burst duration (burst dur't), number of action potentials generated during each burst (APs burst), mean and peak discharge frequency (Mean freq and Peak freq, respectively) compared with baseline. The activity of these neurons rapidly recovered back to baseline levels (recovery). * = P < 0.05, one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc SNK, n = 9.

 
The effect of SSP on an EAUG neuron is shown in Fig. 3. This neuron was characterized by activity during expiratory phase with a progressive increase in its frequency of AP discharge that terminated abruptly with the onset of inspiration (Fig. 3, A and B). Picoejection of SSP produced an increase in the peak instantaneous firing frequency over the duration of the picoejection which returned to baseline shortly following termination of the picoejection (Fig. 3A). In addition to increasing its peak discharge rate, SSP also increased the mean discharge rate, the number of AP generated during the early bursting phase, and SSP also increased the burst duration of each burst with activity occurring earlier in expiration compared with baseline conditions as seen in Fig. 3D.


Figure 3
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Picoejection of SSP excites augmenting expiratory neurons (EAUG). A: picoejection of SSP (thick horizontal line) resulted in an increase in peak firing frequency. From top to bottom: instantaneous firing frequency (Inst. Freq), extracellular unit recording (VRG unit), integrated phrenic nerve discharge ({int}PND). Horizontal dashed line is the peak discharge averaged over 10 respiratory cycles prior to picoejection. B: enlargement of a single respiratory cycle illustrating the incrementing activity of this EAUG neuron during late expiration terminating abruptly at the onset of the following inspiration. C: waveform analysis of the action potentials trajectories during baseline (blue) and SSP picoejection (red) during periods indicated by the blue and red horizontal lines in A. The waveform analysis confirmed that the recording was from the same single unit. The number of action potential shown in each overlay is indicated. D: average number of action potentials (5 respiratory cycles, 50-ms bins) during baseline (blue bars) and SSP picoejection (red bars) plotted in relation to PND, where time 0 is the onset of a phrenic burst. These data demonstrate the increase in unit discharge rate throughout expiration with prolonged discharge duration. E: quantification of the effect of SSP on ETONIC neurons (n = 9). SSP picoejection significantly increased burst duration (burst dur't), number of action potentials generated during each burst (APs burst), mean and peak discharge frequency (Mean freq and Peak freq, respectively) compared with baseline. The activity of these neurons rapidly recovered back to baseline levels (recovery). * = P < 0.05, one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc SNK, n = 4.

 
Similar results were found when SSP was applied to an EDEC neuron (Fig. 4). This neuron displayed a decrementing pattern of AP discharge that began abruptly when phrenic nerve activity ceased and terminated near the end of expiration. SSP increased the total number of APs generated per burst and also prolonging the duration of each burst with action potentials generated later in the expiratory phase (Fig. 4, C and D). However, SSP had no effect on the mean or peak firing frequency in this subpopulation of neurons.


Figure 4
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Picoejection of SSP excites decrementing-expiratory (EDEC) neurons. A: picoejection of SSP (thick horizontal line) resulted in an increase in the number of action potentials generated per burst but had no effect on peak firing frequency. From top to bottom: instantaneous firing frequency (Inst. Freq), extracellular unit recording (VRG unit), integrated phrenic nerve discharge ({int}PND). Horizontal dashed line is the peak discharge averaged over 10 respiratory cycles prior to picoejection. B: enlargement of a single respiratory cycle illustrating the activity of this EDEC neuron with activity decreasing throughout expiration. C: waveform analysis of the action potentials trajectories during baseline (blue) and SSP picoejection (red) during periods indicated by the blue and red horizontal lines in A. The waveform analysis confirmed that the recording was from the same single unit. The number of action potential shown in each overlay is indicated. D: average number of action potentials (5 respiratory cycles, 50-ms bins) during baseline (blue bars) and SSP picoejection (red bars) plotted in relation to phrenic nerve discharge (PND), where time 0 is the end of a phrenic burst. These data demonstrate the increase in unit discharge rate throughout expiration with prolonged discharge duration. E: quantification of the effect of SSP on EDEC neurons (n = 6). SSP picoejection significantly increased burst duration (burst dur't), number of action potentials generated during each burst (AP burst). However, mean and peak discharge frequency (Mean freq and Peak freq, respectively) was not altered compared with baseline. The activity of these neurons rapidly recovered back to baseline levels (recovery). * = P < 0.05, one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc SNK, n = 6.

 
Effect of NK1-R antagonism on locomotor respiratory coupling by somatic afferent stimulation

To determine whether phasic coupling between locomotor and respiratory rhythms depended on SPergic signaling in the VRG, we unilaterally blocked NK1-R by microinjecting CP into a region that contained expiratory neurons, verified by extracellular recording (Fig. 5 A) and functionally identified as the BötC region by DLH microinjection evoked bradypnea (Fig. 5B). Prior to blockade of NK1-Rs, somatic stimulation increased the PND frequency and phase-locked PND with the onset of muscle contraction (Fig. 6 A), indicated by constant latency between contraction and subsequent phrenic burst (Fig. 6C). Unilateral microinjection of CP, ipsilateral to somatic afferent stimulation, did not affect basal respiratory rhythm but eliminated the phasic coupling of locomotor and respiratory rhythms (Fig. 6, B and C). However, it should be noted that somatic stimulation increased overall PND frequency to the same extent as during the control condition (Fig. 6, A and B), which was in agreement with previous work (Potts et al. 2005Go). A peristimulus-timed histogram (PSTH) between the onset of somatic stimulation (i.e., forelimb tension development) and PND demonstrated that phase-coupling was completely eliminated following NK1-R blockade (Fig. 6C). In addition, CP significantly increased the average latency and its variability between the onset of locomotor and respiratory activity (Fig. 6D).


Figure 5
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Electrophysiological and functional characterization of Bötzinger Complex prior to neurokinin-1 receptor antagonism. A: multiunit extracellular recording of compound unit activity during the expiratory phase, compared with the phrenic nerve discharge, demonstrating placement of the microelectrode in an expiratory region. B: microinjection of D-L-homocysteric acid (DLH, 6 pmol in 6 nl) resulted in an extension of expiratory duration confirming placement of the microelectrode in the Bötzinger Complex as previously described (Fong and Potts 2006Go; Monnier et al. 2003Go; Wang et al. 2002Go).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. NK1-R antagonism in the Bötzinger Complex (BötC) abolished locomotor-respiratory coupling (LRC). A: electrically induced contraction of the forelimb resulted in excitation of phrenic nerve discharge frequency (top) and phasically coupled PND to forelimb contraction. Inset: enlarged section clearly illustrating the phasic coupling of PND onset to electrically evoked contraction. B: following NK1-R blockade in the BötC, the phasic coupling between forelimb contraction and PND was lost, although overall excitation of PND remained. C: poststimulus time histogram of the latency between the onset of muscle tension and PND calculated from A and B. During control ({blacksquare}) there was a tight correlation between the onset of muscle tension and PND (average latency = 126 ms). This relationship was lost following NK1-R blockade with CP99,994 ({square}) in the BötC (average latency = 606 ms). D: box-whisker plot of the latency between contraction onset and PND during control ({blacksquare}) and following NK1-R blockade ({square}). The latency was significantly lengthened following NK1-R blockade in the BötC. The latency between the onset of muscle tension and PND for each contraction is denoted by a gray dot. *, P < 0.05, control vs. CP99,994, n = 57 (control) and 67 (CP99,994) stimulated contractions.

 
Effect of somatic afferent stimulation on expiratory neurons

Based on the preceding finding that blockade of NK1-R abolished LRC and that activation of somatic afferents selectively augments the discharge frequency of EAUG neurons (Potts et al. 2005Go), we hypothesized that somatic-evoked excitation of EAUG neurons require local SP release. In recorded EAUG neurons that were excited by exogenous SSP (n = 4), somatic stimulation increased mean and peak instantaneous firing frequency (Fig. 7 A). This was accompanied by a shortening of expiratory duration and a premature onset of phrenic nerve discharge. Picoejection of CP completely abolished somatic-evoked excitation of EAUG neurons (Fig. 7B). However, CP alone failed to alter the cell's overall discharge profile (Fig. 7B). Group results found that NK1-R blockade significantly prevented somatic-evoked excitation of EAUG (Fig. 7C).


Figure 7
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. NK1-R antagonism blocks somatic afferent evoked excitation of EAUG. A: forelimb contraction excited this EAUG neuron and reduced expiratory duration. Right: an overlay of the respiratory period before (blue) and during (red) somatic afferent stimulation as indicated by the dashed boxes on the left panel. The peak firing frequency of this neuron was increased by contraction. Inset: waveform analysis of this neuron showing that the recording was obtained from a single unit. B: in the same neuron, blockade of NK1-R by CP99,994 prevented contraction-evoked excitation, although electrical stimulation of the forelimb still produced a shortening of expiratory duration. Right: an overlay of the respiratory period before (blue) and during (red) forelimb contraction as indicated by the dashed boxes in the left panel. Following blockade of NK1-R there was no discernible change in the firing frequency between these 2 respiratory cycles. Inset: waveform analysis of this neuron showing it is the same neuron as in A. C: quantified data showing that somatic afferent stimulation increased both the mean and peak discharge frequency of EAUG neurons. However, contraction evoked excitation was prevented by CP99,994. *, P < 0.05, paired t-test, control vs. CP99,994, n = 4.

 
Because somatic stimulation also inhibits EDEC neurons (Potts et al. 2005Go), we tested whether blockade of NK1-Rs would alter this inhibition. As we have previously shown, somatic afferent stimulation reduced the burst duration of EDEC neurons, accompanied by a reduction in expiratory duration (Fig. 8A). NK1-R antagonism had no effect on somatic evoked reduction in either EDEC burst duration or expiratory duration (Fig. 8B). Table 5 contains group data showing that blockade of NK1-R had no effect on somatic evoked inhibition of EDEC burst duration, the number of action potentials per burst, or the reduction in expiratory duration (n = 7). In addition, the latency for inhibition of EDEC neurons was not altered by NK1-R blockade (89.7 ± 17.8 vs. 109 ± 30.8 ms, control vs. NK1-R blockade, P = 0.372, paired t-test, n = 7).


Figure 8
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 8. NK1-R blockade did not affect inhibition of EDEC neurons by somatic afferent stimulation. A: somatic afferent stimulation reduced expiratory duration (TE) and the duration of EDEC discharge. B: contraction-evoked inhibition of TE and EDEC discharge was not altered by CP99,994.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5. Effect of somatic afferent stimulation on decrementing-expiratory neurons before and after NK1-R blockade by CP

 
Localization of recording sites

The stereotaxic coordinates where E neurons were recorded in the VRG (n = 35) is illustrated in Fig. 9. Recorded neurons were distributed in a longitudinal column ventral of nucleus ambiguus extending rostrocaudally from the caudal pole of the facial nucleus to calamus scriptorius (CS). These neurons were concentrated in two regions, 300–600 µm caudal to the caudal pole of the facial nucleus and 300–600 µm rostral of CS corresponding to the BötC and rVRG, respectively.


Figure 9
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 9. Locations of recorded expiratory neurons in the ventral respiratory group and their responsiveness to picoejection of SSP, plotted using the stereotaxic coordinates documented on sections drawn from a representative brain stem. Red symbols, neurons that were excited by picoejection of SSP; gray symbols, neurons that did not respond to SSP. CS, calamus scriptorious; ETONIC, tonic expiratory neuron; IO, inferior olivary complex; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; Sp5, spinal trigeminal nucleus.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The current study provides the first direct evidence that E neurons in the VRG can be excited by exogenous substance P. This excitation was eliminated by pharmacological blockade of NK1-Rs, suggesting that SP-evoked excitation of E neurons was mediated through activation of the NK1-R. Furthermore, baseline activity of E neurons was unaffected by NK1-R blockade indicating that SP in BötC is likely not involved in establishing the baseline activity of E neurons during eupnea. These data demonstrate that E neurons in the VRG express functional NK1-Rs and thus suggest that SPergic signaling may be involved in modulating respiratory rhythm under specific physiological conditions. We also found that LRC requires SPergic modulation of E neurons. We reported that unilateral blockade of NK1-Rs in the BötC eliminated the phasic coupling between locomotor and respiratory rhythms. However, it failed to alter the overall excitation of respiratory frequency during skeletal muscle contraction. Furthermore, muscle contraction excited a population of EAUG neurons the excitation of which was prevented following blockade of NK1-Rs. Together, these findings suggest that somatic afferent stimulation evokes endogenous release of SP in the BötC which plays a critical role in LRC by selectively modulating the excitability of EAUG neurons.

Substance P modulates the excitability of expiratory neurons

Substance P is a potent stimulator of respiration and can excite inspiration and prolong expiration by selectively activating separate populations of respiratory neurons in the VRG (Chen et al. 1990aGo,bGo; Fong and Potts 2006Go; Gray et al. 1999Go; Hedner et al. 1984Go; Morgado-Valle and Feldman 2004Go; Ptak et al. 2000aGo). The role of SP and NK1-R has been the focus of much research as it is involved in mediating a number of respiratory reflex responses, including hypoxic ventilatory response and central chemosensitivity (Chen et al. 1990aGo; Gray et al. 2001Go; Mazzone et al. 1997Go; Nattie and Li 2002Go; Ptak et al. 2002Go; Wickstrom et al. 2004Go). Although NK1-R are localized throughout the VRG (Gray et al. 1999Go; Guyenet et al. 2002Go; Nakaya et al. 1994Go; Wang et al. 2001Go) with expression confirmed on preinspiratory neurons (Guyenet and Wang 2001Go), the effect of direct activation of NK1-R expressing expiratory neurons on respiratory rhythm has not been thoroughly explored. Although substance P can decrease respiratory frequency by prolonging expiratory duration (Chen et al. 1990bGo; Fong and Potts 2006Go; Makeham et al. 2005Go), the functional expression of NK1-R on individual expiratory neurons has not been demonstrated. We now provide evidence that exogenous SP modulates the excitability of a subpopulation of E neurons suggesting a possible functional role for NK1-Rs in an expiratory region of the VRG. The ability of the selective NK1-R antagonist, CP99,994, to block the effects of exogenous SSP further strengthens the proposal that excitation of E neurons by SSP was mediated by selective activation of NK1-Rs.

The increase in excitability of E neurons by SSP agrees with previous data demonstrating that exogenous SP can increase the discharge rate of several neuronal populations including, phrenic motor neurons (Ptak et al. 2000bGo), C1 bulbospinal neurons in the rostroventral lateral medulla (Li and Guyenet 1997Go), midbrain periaqueductal gray neurons (Drew et al. 2005Go), and NTS neurons (Boscan et al. 2002Go). Although the mechanism by which NK1-R activation leads to an increase in neuronal excitability remains to be determined, this effect may be mediated through a reduction in leak K+ conductance that would result in raising resting membrane potential, possibly via inhibition of TASK channels (Boscan et al. 2002Go; Li and Guyenet 1997Go; Ptak et al. 2000bGo; Washburn et al. 2003Go). As TASK channels are modulated by receptors coupled to G{alpha}q proteins, such as NK1-R, and these channels are expressed on majority of NK1-R expressing neurons throughout the VRG (Washburn et al. 2003Go), this is a likely possibility. Alternatively, NK1-R activation could increase the excitability of E neurons through phosphorylation of G proteins leading to turnover of intracellular inositol triphosphate (IP3) to raise intracellular calcium (Harrison and Geppetti 2001Go; Washburn et al. 2003Go). Finally, NK1-R may increase neuronal excitability by modulating R-type Ca2+ currents (Meza et al. 2007Go). Thus future work is needed to identify the cellular mechanism(s) of NK1-R activation on membrane excitability of E neurons.

Reflex activation of NK1-R on expiratory neurons modulates respiratory rhythm

The lack of effect on the basal activity of E neurons following blockade of NK1-R (Table 4) suggests there is no tonic release of endogenous SP onto expiratory neurons of the VRG. Thus this raises the following question: under what condition(s) is endogenous SP released? Data from the present study found that a heterogeneous population of E neurons, including EDEC and EAUG neurons, was excited by exogenous SP. This suggests that endogenous SP and NK1-R may be involved in modulating the excitability of EDEC and EAUG neurons, and these neurons are involved in modulating respiratory rhythm in response to activation of a variety of afferents, including arterial chemoreceptors (Sun and Reis 1996Go), pulmonary stretch receptors (Hayashi et al. 1996Go), and somatic afferents (Potts et al. 2005Go). It has previously been shown that activation of the slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors (SARs) by the Hering-Breuer reflex (HB-reflex) excites EDEC neurons in the VRG (Hayashi et al. 1996Go). Recently we have demonstrated that extension of expiratory duration by SARs of the Hering-Breuer reflex requires the activation of NK1-R in the BötC (Fong and Potts 2006Go). We therefore posited that activation of SARs evokes endogenous release of SP in the BötC, which, in turn, activates NK1-R and excites a subpopulation of EDEC neurons. This excitation leads to prolonged inhibition of EAUG neurons, resulting in extension of expiration, as proposed by current models of respiratory rhythm generation (Fong and Potts 2006Go; Richter et al. 1986Go; Rybak et al. 2004Go) (see also Fig. 10). We now show that NK1-Rs are functionally expressed on a subpopulation of propriobulbar EDEC neurons that support our earlier proposal.


Figure 10
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 10. Proposed models of SPergic modulation of respiratory rhythm in the pontomedullary axis. A: parasagittal section of the brain stem illustrating the proposed neural pathways responsible for mediating the Hering-Breuer (HB) Reflex (blue) and LRC (green). Slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors (SAR) project to the NTS where they synapse onto pump cells. These neurons, in turn, project to the BötC and activate EDEC neurons that inhibit inspiratory (I) and EAUG cells, resulting in early termination of inspiration, prolongation of expiration and the slowing of respiratory frequency (B). Contraction-sensitive somatic afferents, on the other hand, project to the dorsal pons (including the lateral parabrachial complex) via a synapse in the dorsal horn and activate excitatory cells that project to BötC. These neurons selectively target EAUG neurons, which, in turn, inhibits EDEC neurons resulting in the disinhibition of I neurons. Release of phasic inhibition by EDEC neurons promotes the early onset of inspiration and increases respiratory frequency (B). 7, facial nucleus; CVLM, caudal ventrolateral medulla; Pre-BötC, pre-Bötzinger complex; r/cVRG, rostral/caudal ventral respiratory group.

 
In addition to EDEC neurons, we found that a subpopulation of EAUG neurons was also excited by exogenous SSP. It is highly unlikely that this subpopulation of E neurons is involved in the HB-reflex because their excitation strongly inhibits EDEC neurons (Fong and Potts 2006Go; Potts et al. 2005Go; Rybak et al. 2004Go). However, because EAUG neurons are excited by somatic afferent stimulation (Potts et al. 2005Go), their excitation may require endogenous SP. Substance P has been demonstrated to participate in the somatic afferent reflex at the level of the spinal cord (Wilson et al. 1993aGo,bGo) and the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) (Potts et al. 1999Go). Because spinal dorsal horn neurons project predominately ipsilaterally throughout the VRG (Potts et al. 2002Go), we hypothesized that excitation of EAUG neurons and LRC evoked by somatic afferent stimulation requires NK1-R activation in the ipsilateral VRG. We determined that NK1-R blockade in the ipsilateral BötC by microinjection of CP eliminated the phasic coupling of respiratory and skeletal muscle activity. Additionally, we determined this phasic coupling was mediated by activation of NK1-Rs on EAUG neurons, as the contraction evoked excitation of EAUG neurons was abolished following NK1-R blockade. Together these findings demonstrate that endogenous SP is released in the VRG during somatic afferent stimulation to excite BötC EAUG neurons that participate in the coupling of respiratory and locomotor rhythms. However, it is interesting to note that although LRC was blocked by CP, the overall excitation of respiratory activity (i.e., PND frequency) was unaltered. This finding was similar to the effect we observed following pharmacological blockade of synaptic transmission in the lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBN) (Potts et al. 2005Go), suggesting that SPergic mechanisms in the BötC contribute to phase-transitions in respiratory rhythm.

Interestingly, both the HB-reflex (Fong and Potts 2006Go) and LRC require SPergic signaling in the BötC. Activation of these two reflex pathways result in opposing effects on respiratory rhythm: the HB-reflex extends expiration and slows respiratory rhythm; whereas LRC excites respiration by reducing expiratory duration. These two reflex pathways also have different synaptic targets: the HB-reflex excites EDEC neurons while somatic afferent stimulation excites EAUG neurons (although both of these E populations are excited by exogenous SSP). This finding suggests that multiple afferent pathways innervating different E populations utilize SP as a neuromodulator.

In the present study, we did not directly determine whether the neurons we recorded were bulbospinal neurons or vagal motorneurons. However, our data support the idea that these neurons were likely propriobulbar neurons based on the finding that a subpopulation of NK1-R expressing EDEC neurons that inhibit EAUG neurons in the BötC following HB-reflex activation (Fong and Potts 2006Go). Additionally, earlier work from our lab found that EAUG neurons increase respiratory frequency by inhibiting EDEC neurons in the BötC (Potts et al. 2005Go). Thus our present data are consistent with the notion that NK1-Rs are expressed on a subpopulation of propriobulbar EAUG neurons. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that NK1-Rs may also be expressed on expiratory premotor neurons as has been reported on a subpopulation of inspiratory premotor neurons (Guyenet et al. 2002Go).

Previously, we hypothesized that a possible source of SP for the excitation of EDEC neurons by SARs may be pump neurons in the NTS (Fong and Potts 2006Go) (see Fig. 10). We now propose that LPBN may be an additional source of SP to the BötC that specifically targets EAUG neurons. This is based on of the following observations: 1) inhibition of LPBN (Potts et al. 2005Go) as well as blockade of NK1-R in the BötC, result in a similar loss of phase coupling of respiration to muscle contraction without a loss in overall excitation of respiration; 2) SPergic neurons are localized in the LPBN (Block and Hoffman 1987Go; Douglas et al. 1982Go; Leger et al. 1983Go; Potts et al. 2005Go); and 3) BötC receives direct projections from respiratory neurons in the dorsolateral pons region, including the LPBN (Ezure and Tanaka 2006Go). We propose that ascending somatosensory input from the spinal dorsal horn transmitting sensory information from contracting muscles excites SPergic neurons in the LPBN that in turn project to and excite EAUG neurons in the VRG through release of SP (Fig. 10), although a direct SPergic projection from the LPBN to the BötC remains to be confirmed. Taking these current findings together with the existing knowledge that NK1-R are vital to the hypoxic ventilatory response and central chemosensitivity (Chen et al. 1990aGo; Ezure and Tanaka 2006Go; Gray et al. 2001Go; Mazzone et al. 1997Go; Nattie and Li 2002Go; Ptak et al. 2002Go; Wickstrom et al. 2004Go) further establishes a fundamental role for the endogenous release of SP in modulating E neuron excitability and demonstrate that the modulation and formation of respiratory rhythm depends on reflex specific inputs to BötC.

Technical considerations

The picoejection method employed in the current study has been used by a number of other investigators to examine the effect of discrete drug application onto recorded neurons (Boscan et al. 2002Go, 2005Go; Brandes et al. 2006Go). This method allows for highly localized application of drugs onto functionally identified neurons using drug solutions at physiological pH 7.4, compared with iontophoresis, which typically requires the solutions to carry an ionic charge that alters solution pH. The ability to use solutions at physiological pH is particularly important as neurons in the ventrolateral medulla, including the VRG neurons, which have been shown to express TASK channels, can be inhibited by changing extracellular pH (Washburn et al. 2003Go). Due to this characteristic of neurons, we felt that the use of drug solutions departing from neutral pH may make it difficult to differentiate between the direct effects of the drug versus the indirect effect of pH, thus making the results difficult to interpret.

Although we were unable to directly measure the volume of drug ejected, we are confident that each ejection was localized to a finite volume as there was no effect on network output, including no change in the frequency or amplitude of the phrenic motor output (Table 3). An earlier study by Monnier and colleagues (2003)Go showed that microinjection volumes as small as 3 nl into the VRG can affect network output. Similarly, we recently showed in the same preparation that microinjection volumes as small as 4–6 nl of SSP at a similar concentration to that used in the current study could produce profound effects on respiratory frequency (Fong and Potts 2006Go). Together with the slow ejection rate, the short-duration of ejection time (30 s) and the rapid decrease in concentration of the drug relative to the distance from the pipette tip (Stone 1985Go), we propose that the sphere of influence for the picoejected drug was highly localized and mainly affected the recorded neuron. While we cannot exclude the possibility that the drug may have produced presynaptic effects, NK1-R labeling is predominantly localized to the soma and dendrites of VRG neurons (Liu et al. 2004Go), suggesting that the likely site of action was postsynaptic.

Summary

Data from the present study identify a subpopulation of E neurons that express NK1-R the activation of which increases neuronal excitability. Following blockade of NK1-R, the basal activity of E neurons remained unchanged, suggesting that SP does not significantly contribute to the basal level of excitability of these neurons nor to the generation of respiratory rhythm during eupnea. However, its endogenous release plays an important role in modulating respiratory rhythm during reflex activation. Indeed, LRC evoked by somatic afferent stimulation requires functional NK1-R expression on EAUG neurons in the BötC. Together with existing data, the present findings further establish the functional importance of SPergic mechanisms in modulating respiratory rhythm by increasing the excitability of EDEC and EAUG neurons in a reflex pathway-specific manner.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We are grateful for National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-059167 to J. T. Potts.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank Pfizer for the generous gift of CP99,994.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Present address and address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. T. Potts, Dept. of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76107 (E-mail: jepotts{at}hsc.unt.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Block CH, Hoffman GE. Neuropeptide and monoamine components of the parabrachial pontine complex. Peptides 8: 267–283, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Boscan P, Dutschmann M, Herbert H, Paton JF. Neurokininergic mechanism within the lateral crescent nucleus of the parabrachial complex participates in the heart-rate response to nociception. J Neurosci 25: 1412–1420, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boscan P, Kasparov S, Paton JF. Somatic nociception activates NK1 receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarii to attenuate the baroreceptor cardiac reflex. Eur J Neurosci 16: 907–920, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brandes IF, Zuperku EJ, Stucke AG, Jakovcevic D, Hopp FA, Stuth EA. Serotonergic modulation of inspiratory hypoglossal motoneurons in decerebrate dogs. J Neurophysiol 95: 3449–3459, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cao YQ, Mantyh PW, Carlson EJ, Gillespie AM, Epstein CJ, Basbaum AI. Primary afferent tachykinins are required to experience moderate to intense pain. Nature 392: 390–394, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen Z, Hedner J, Hedner T. Substance P in the ventrolateral medulla oblongata regulates ventilatory responses. J Appl Physiol 68: 2631–2639, 1990a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen ZB, Hedner J, Hedner T. Local effects of substance P on respiratory regulation in the rat medulla oblongata. J Appl Physiol 68: 693–699, 1990b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Felipe C, Herrero JF, O'Brien JA, Palmer JA, Doyle CA, Smith AJ, Laird JM, Belmonte C, Cervero F, Hunt SP. Altered nociception, analgesia and aggression in mice lacking the receptor for substance P. Nature 392: 394–397, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]

Douglas FL, Palkovits M, Brownstein MJ. Regional distribution of substance P-like immunoreactivity in the lower brainstem of the rat. Brain Res 245: 376–378, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Drew GM, Mitchell VA, Vaughan CW. Postsynaptic actions of substance P on rat periaqueductal grey neurons in vitro. Neuropharmacology 49: 587–595, 2005.[Web of Science][Medline]

Ezure K. Synaptic connections between medullary respiratory neurons and considerations on the genesis of respiratory rhythm. Prog Neurobiol 35: 429–450, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ezure K, Tanaka I. Distribution and medullary projection of respiratory neurons in the dorsolateral pons of the rat. Neuroscience 141: 1011–1023, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ezure K, Tanaka I, Saito Y, Otake K. Axonal projections of pulmonary slowly adapting receptor relay neurons in the rat. J Comp Neurol 446: 81–94, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fong AY, Potts JT. Neurokinin-1 receptor activation in Botzinger complex evokes bradypnea. J Physiol 575: 869–886, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Funk GD, Steeves JD, Milsom WK. Coordination of wingbeat and respiration in birds. II. "Fictive" flight. J Appl Physiol 73: 1025–1033, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gray PA, Janczewski WA, Mellen N, McCrimmon DR, Feldman JL. Normal breathing requires pre-Botzinger complex neurokinin-1 receptor-expressing neurons. Nat Neurosci 4: 927–930, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gray PA, Rekling JC, Bocchiaro CM, Feldman JL. Modulation of respiratory frequency by peptidergic input to rhythmogenic neurons in the preBotzinger complex. Science 286: 1566–1568, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guyenet PG, Sevigny CP, Weston MC, Stornetta RL. Neurokinin-1 receptor-expressing cells of the ventral respiratory group are functionally heterogeneous and predominantly glutamatergic. J Neurosci 22: 3806–3816, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guyenet PG, Wang H. Pre-Botzinger neurons with preinspiratory discharges "in vivo" express NK1 receptors in the rat. J Neurophysiol 86: 438–446, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harrison S, Geppetti P. Substance P. Intl J Biochem Cell Biol 33: 555–576, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hayashi F, Coles SK, McCrimmon DR. Respiratory neurons mediating the Breuer-Hering reflex prolongation of expiration in rat. J Neurosci 16: 6526–6536, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hedner J, Hedner T, Wessberg P, Jonason J. Interaction of substance P with the respiratory control system in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 228: 196–201, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Iscoe S. Respiratory and stepping frequencies in conscious exercising cats. J Appl Physiol 51: 835–839, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johnson SM, Smith JC, Feldman JL. Modulation of respiratory rhythm in vitro: role of Gi/o protein-mediated mechanisms. J Appl Physiol 80: 2120–2133, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kubin L, Alheid GF, Zuperku EJ, McCrimmon DR. Central pathways of pulmonary and lower airway vagal afferents. J Appl Physiol 101: 618–627, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leger L, Charnay Y, Chayvialle JA, Berod A, Dray F, Pujol JF, Jouvet M, Dubois PM. Localization of substance P- and enkephalin-like immunoreactivity in relation to catecholamine-containing cell bodies in the cat dorsolateral pontine tegmentum: an immunofluorescence study. Neuroscience 8: 525–546, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Li YW, Guyenet PG. Effect of substance P on C1 and other bulbospinal cells of the RVLM in neonatal rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 273: R805–R813, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu YY, Wong-Riley MTT, Liu JP, Wei XY, Jia Y, Liu HL, Fujiyama F, Ju G. Substance P and enkephalinergic synapses onto neurokinin-1 receptor-immunoreactive neurons in the pre-Botzinger complex of rats. Eur J Neurosci 19: 65–75, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Makeham JM, Goodchild AK, Pilowsky PM. NK1 receptor activation in rat rostral ventrolateral medulla selectively attenuates somato-sympathetic reflex while antagonism attenuates sympathetic chemoreflex. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 288: R1707–R1715, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mazzone SB, Hinrichsen CF, Geraghty DP. Substance P receptors in brain stem respiratory centers of the rat: regulation of NK1 receptors by hypoxia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282: 1547–1556, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McKay LC, Janczewski WA, Feldman JL. Sleep-disordered breathing after targeted ablation of pre-Botzinger complex neurons. Nat Neurosci 8: 1142–1144, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Meza U, Thapliyal A, Bannister RA, Adams BA. Neurokinin 1 receptors trigger overlapping stimulation and inhibition of CaV2.3 (R-Type) calcium channels. Mol Pharmacol 71: 284–293, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Monnier A, Alheid GF, McCrimmon DR. Defining ventral medullary respiratory compartments with a glutamate receptor agonist in the rat. J Physiol 548: 859–874, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Monteau R, Ptak K, Broquere N, Hilaire G. Tachykinins and central respiratory activity: an in vitro study on the newborn rat. Eur J Pharmacol 314: 41–50, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Morgado-Valle C, Feldman JL. Depletion of substance P and glutamate by capsaicin blocks respiratory rhythm in neonatal rat in vitro. J Physiol 555: 783–792, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nakaya Y, Kaneko T, Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S, Mizuno N. Immunohistochemical localization of substance P receptor in the central nervous system of the adult rat. J Comp Neurol 347: 249–274, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nattie EE, Li A. Substance P-saporin lesion of neurons with NK1 receptors in one chemoreceptor site in rats decreases ventilation and chemosensitivity. J Physiol 544: 603–616, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paton JF. A working heart-brainstem preparation of the mouse. J Neurosci Methods 65: 63–68, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Potts JT, Fuchs IE, Li J, Leshnower B, Mitchell JH. Skeletal muscle afferent fibers release substance P in the nucleus tractus solitarii of anaesthetized cats. J Physiol 514: 829–841, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Potts JT, Lee SM, Anguelov PI. Tracing of projection neurons from the cervical dorsal horn to the medulla with the anterograde tracer biotinylated dextran amine. Auton Neurosci 98: 64–69, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Potts JT, Rybak IA, Paton JF. Respiratory rhythm entrainment by somatic afferent stimulation. J Neurosci 25: 1965–1978, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Potts JT, Spyer KM, Paton JF. Somatosympathetic reflex in a working heart-brain stem preparation of the rat. Brain Res Bull 53: 59–67, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ptak K, Burnet H, Blanchi B, Sieweke M, De FC, Hunt SP, Monteau R, Hilaire G. The murine neurokinin NK1 receptor gene contributes to the adult hypoxic facilitation of ventilation. Eur J Neurosci 16: 2245–2252, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ptak K, Di PE, Monteau R. Substance P and central respiratory activity: a comparative in vitro study on foetal and newborn rat. Dev Brain Res 114: 217–227, 1999.[Medline]

Ptak K, Hunt SP, Monteau R. Substance P and central respiratory activity: a comparative in vitro study in NK1 receptor knockout and wild-type mice. Pfluegers 440: 446–451, 2000a.[CrossRef]

Ptak K, Konrad M, Di PE, Tell F, Hilaire G, Monteau R. Cellular and synaptic effect of substance P on neonatal phrenic motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci 12: 126–138, 2000b.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Richter DW, Ballantyne D, Remmers JE. How is the respiratory rhythm generated? A model. News Physiol Sci 1: 109–112, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Richter DW, Spyer KM. Studying rhythmogenesis of breathing: comparison of in vivo and in vitro models. Trends Neurosci 24: 464–472, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rybak IA, Shevtsova NA, Paton JF, Dick TE, St-John WM, Morschel M, Dutschmann M. Modeling the ponto-medullary respiratory network. Resp Physiol Neurobiol 143: 307–319, 2004.[CrossRef]

Smith JC, Ellenberger HH, Ballanyi K, Richter DW, Feldman JL. Pre-Botzinger complex: a brainstem region that may generate respiratory rhythm in mammals. Science 254: 726–729, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stone TW. Microinotophoresis and Pressure Injections. New York: Wiley, 1985.

Sun MK, Reis DJ. Excitatory amino acid-mediated chemoreflex excitation of respiratory neurones in rostral ventrolateral medulla in rats. J Physiol 492: 559–571, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Telgkamp P, Cao YQ, Basbaum AI, Ramirez JM. Long-term deprivation of substance P in PPT-A mutant mice alters the anoxic response of the isolated respiratory network. J Neurophysiol 88: 206–213, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang H, Germanson TP, Guyenet PG. Depressor and tachypneic responses to chemical stimulation of the ventral respiratory group are reduced by ablation of neurokinin-1 receptor-expressing neurons. J Neurosci 22: 3755–3764, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang H, Stornetta RL, Rosin DL, Guyenet PG. Neurokinin-1 receptor-immunoreactive neurons of the ventral respiratory group in the rat. J Comp Neurol 434: 128–146, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Washburn CP, Bayliss DA, Guyenet PG. Cardiorespiratory neurons of the rat ventrolateral medulla contain TASK-1 and TASK-3 channel mRNA. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 138: 19–35, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wenninger JM, Pan LG, Klum L, Leekley T, Bastastic J, Hodges MR, Feroah T, Davis S, Forster HV. Small reduction of neurokinin-1 receptor-expressing neurons in the pre-Botzinger complex area induces abnormal breathing periods in awake goats. J Appl Physiol 97: 1620–1628, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wickstrom HR, Berner J, Holgert H, Hokfelt T, Lagercrantz H. Hypoxic response in newborn rat is attenuated by neurokinin-1 receptor blockade. Resp Physiol Neurobiol 140: 19–31, 2004.[CrossRef]

Wilson LB, Fuchs IE, Matsukawa K, Mitchell JH, Wall PT. Substance P release in the spinal cord during the exercise pressor reflex in anaesthetized cats. J Physiol 460: 79–90, 1993a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilson LB, Fuchs IE, Mitchell JH. Effects of graded muscle contractions on spinal cord substance P release, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. Circ Res 73: 1024–1031, 1993b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. Mutolo, F. Bongianni, E. Cinelli, G. A. Fontana, and T. Pantaleo
Modulation of the cough reflex by antitussive agents within the caudal aspect of the nucleus tractus solitarii in the rabbit
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): R243 - R251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/900    most recent
00864.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fong, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Potts, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fong, A. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Potts, J. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.