JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00012.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1626    most recent
00012.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Downing, P. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Downing, P. E
Submitted on January 5, 2007
Accepted on June 26, 2007

fMRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas

John Charles Taylor1, Alison Joyce Wiggett1, and Paul E Downing1*

1 Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, gwynedd, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.downing{at}bangor.ac.uk.

This study examined the contributions of two previously-identified brain regions -- the extrastriate and fusiform body areas (EBA and FBA) -- to the visual representation of the human form. Specifically we measured in these two areas the magnitude of fMRI response as a function of the amount of the human figure that is visible in the image, in the range from a single finger to the entire body. A second experiment determined the selectivity of these regions for body and body part stimuli relative to closely-matched control images. We found a gradual increase in the selectivity of the EBA as a function of the amount of body shown. In contrast, the FBA shows a step like function, with no significant selectivity for individual fingers or hands. In a third experiment we demonstrate that the response pattern seen in EBA does not extend to adjacent motion-selective area hMT. We propose an interpretation of these results by analogy to nearby face-selective regions OFA (occipital face area) and FFA (fusiform face area). Specifically, we hypothesize that the EBA analyzes bodies at the level of parts (as has been proposed for faces in the OFA), whereas FBA (by analogy to FFA) may have a role in processing the configuration of body parts into wholes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Lamm and J. Decety
Is the Extrastriate Body Area (EBA) Sensitive to the Perception of Pain in Others?
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2369 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.