|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nq6{at}columbia.edu.
Several models exist for explaining V1 orientation tuning. The modified feedforward model (MFM) and the recurrent model (RM) are major examples. We have implemented, at the same level of detail, these two models alongside a few newer variations. We found that anti-phase inhibition in the MFM enhances both spatial phase information and orientation tuning, producing well-tuned simple cells. This remains true for a newer version of the MFM that incorporates un-tuned complex-cell inhibition. In contrast, when the recurrent connections in the RM are strong enough to produce typical V1 orientation tuning, they also eliminate spatial phase information, making the cells complex. Introducing phase-specificity into the connections of the RM (as done in an original version of the RM) can make the cells phase sensitive, but the cells show an incorrect 90° peak-shift of orientation tuning under opposite contrast signs. An inhibition-dominant version of the RM can generate well-tuned cells across the simple/complex spectrum, but it predicts that the net effect of cortical interactions is to suppress feedforward excitation across all orientations in simple cells. Finally, adding anti-phase inhibition used in the MFM into the RM produces a most general model. We call this new model the modified recurrent model (MRM) and show that this model can also produce well-tuned cells throughout the simple/complex spectrum. Since orientation-tuned V1 cells show a continuum of simple- to complex-cell behavior, the MRM provides the best description of V1 data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Diester and A. Nieder Complementary Contributions of Prefrontal Neuron Classes in Abstract Numerical Categorization J. Neurosci., July 30, 2008; 28(31): 7737 - 7747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Nowak, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and D. A. McCormick Lack of Orientation and Direction Selectivity in a Subgroup of Fast-Spiking Inhibitory Interneurons: Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms and Comparison with Other Electrophysiological Cell Types Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1058 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Banitt, K. A. C. Martin, and I. Segev A Biologically Realistic Model of Contrast Invariant Orientation Tuning by Thalamocortical Synaptic Depression J. Neurosci., September 19, 2007; 27(38): 10230 - 10239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sohya, K. Kameyama, Y. Yanagawa, K. Obata, and T. Tsumoto GABAergic Neurons Are Less Selective to Stimulus Orientation than Excitatory Neurons in Layer II/III of Visual Cortex, as Revealed by In Vivo Functional Ca2+ Imaging in Transgenic Mice J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 2145 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |