JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 11, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00019.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/1733    most recent
00019.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marigold, D. S
Right arrow Articles by Patla, A. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marigold, D. S
Right arrow Articles by Patla, A. E
Submitted on January 7, 2005
Accepted on May 5, 2005

Adapting locomotion to different surface compliances: neuromuscular responses and changes in movement dynamics

Daniel S Marigold1 and Aftab E Patla1*

1 Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: patla{at}healthy.uwaterloo.ca.

Knowledge of how the nervous system deals with surfaces with different physical properties such as compliance that challenge balance during locomotion is of importance, as we are constantly faced with these situations everyday. The purpose of this study was to examine the control of centre of mass (COM) and lower limb dynamics and recovery response modulation of muscle activity during locomotion across an unexpected compliant surface and in particular, scaling behaviour across different levels of compliance. Eight young adults walked along a walkway and stepped on an unexpected compliant surface in the middle of the travel path. There were three different levels of surface compliance and participants experienced either no compliant surface or one of the three compliant surfaces during each trial that were presented in a blocked or random fashion. Whole body kinematics were collected along with surface electromyography (EMG) of selected bilateral lower limb and trunk muscles. The recovery response to the first compliant surface trial demonstrated muscle onset latencies between 97 - 175 ms and activity was modulated while on the compliant surface. Vertical COM trajectory was not preserved following contact with the compliant surface: peak vertical COM while on the compliant surface was lower than when on stable ground. Perturbed limb knee flexion after toe-off increased with increased surface compliance, which enabled toe clearance with the ground to be similar to control trials. The results suggest that stepping off of a compliant surface is actively modulated by the CNS and is geared towards maintaining dynamic stability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P.H.J.A. Nieuwenhuijzen and J. Duysens
Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms Play a Role in Stepping on Inverting Surfaces During Gait
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2266 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D.A. McVea and K.G. Pearson
Contextual learning and obstacle memory in the walking cat
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. A. Biewener and M. A. Daley
Unsteady locomotion: integrating muscle function with whole body dynamics and neuromuscular control
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2949 - 2960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. H. van der Linden, D. S. Marigold, F. J.M. Gabreels, and J. Duysens
Muscle Reflexes and Synergies Triggered by an Unexpected Support Surface Height During Walking
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3639 - 3650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.