JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 17, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00027.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/4300    most recent
00027.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vliegen, J.
Right arrow Articles by van Opstal, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vliegen, J.
Right arrow Articles by van Opstal, A. J.
Submitted on January 10, 2005
Accepted on August 11, 2005

Gaze Orienting in Dynamic Visual Double Steps

Joyce Vliegen1, Tom J. Van Grootel1, and A. John van Opstal1*

1 Medical Physics and Biophysics, Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Neuroscience, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.vanOpstal{at}science.ru.nl.

Visual stimuli are initially represented in a retinotopic reference frame. To maintain spatial accuracy of gaze (i.e. eye in space) despite intervening eye and head movements, the visual input could be combined with dynamic feedback about ongoing gaze shifts. Alternatively, target coordinates could be updated in advance by using the preprogrammed gaze-motor command ('predictive remapping'). So far, previous experiments have not dissociated these possibilities. Here we study whether the visuomotor system accounts for saccadic eye-head movements that occur during target presentation. In this case, the system has to deal with fast dynamic changes of the retinal input, and with highly variable changes in relative eye and head movements that cannot be preprogrammed by the gaze control system. We performed visual-visual double-step experiments in which a brief (50 ms) stimulus was presented during a saccadic eye-head gaze shift toward a previously flashed visual target. Our results show that gaze shifts remain accurate under these dynamic conditions, even for stimuli presented near saccade onset, and that eyes and head are driven in oculocentric and craniocentric coordinates, respectively. These results cannot be explained by a predictive remapping scheme. We propose that the visuomotor system adequately processes dynamic changes in visual input that result from self-initiated gaze shifts, to construct a stable representation of visual targets in an absolute, supraretinal (e.g. world) reference frame. Predictive remapping may subserve transsaccadic integration, thus enabling perception of a stable visual scene despite eye movements, while dynamic feedback ensures accurate actions (e.g. eye-head orienting) to a selected goal.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. C. I. van Wetter and A. J. van Opstal
Perisaccadic Mislocalization of Visual Targets by Head-Free Gaze Shifts: Visual or Motor?
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1848 - 1867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.