JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 31, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.00034.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/3/1309    most recent
00034.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lemay, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lemay, M. A.
Submitted on January 10, 2008
Revised on December 15, 2008
Accepted on December 16, 2008

Modularity of endpoint force patterns evoked using intraspinal microstimulation in treadmill trained and/or neurotrophin treated chronic spinal cats

Vanessa Susanne Boyce1 and Michel A. Lemay2*

1 Drexel University College of Medicine
2 Drexel U. College of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mlemay{at}drexelmed.edu.

Chronic spinal cats with neurotrophin-secreting fibroblast (NTF) transplants recover locomotor function (Boyce et al. 2007). To ascertain possible mechanisms, intraspinal microstimulation was used to examine the lumbar spinal cord motor output of four groups of chronic spinal cats: 1) untrained cats with unmodified-fibroblast graft (Op-control) or 2) NTF graft, and 3) locomotor-trained cats with unmodified-fibroblast graft (Trained) or 4) NTF graft (Combination). Forces generated via intraspinal microstimulation during different hindlimb positions were recorded and interpolated, generating representations of force patterns at the paw. EMGs of hindlimb muscles, medial gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, vastus lateralis and biceps femoris posterior, were also collected to examine relationships between activated muscles and force pattern types. The same four force pattern types obtained in spinal intact cats (Lemay and Grill 2004) were found in chronic spinal cats. Proportions of force patterns in spinal cats differed significantly from those in intact cats, but no significant differences in proportions were observed between individual spinal groups. However, the proportions of force patterns differed significantly between trained (Trained and Combination) and untrained groups (Op-control and NTF). Thus, the frequency of expression of some response types was modified by injury and to a lesser extent by training. Force pattern laminar distribution differed in spinal cats compared to intact, with more responses were obtained dorsally (0-1000 µm) and fewer ventrally (3200-5200 µm). EMG analysis demonstrated that muscle activity highly predicted some force pattern types and greatly depended on hindlimb position. We conclude that spinal motor output modularity is preserved after injury.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.