JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 24, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00045.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/3/1187    most recent
00045.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faulstich, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Zeeuw, C. I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faulstich, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Zeeuw, C. I
Submitted on January 14, 2006
Accepted on May 15, 2006

Oculomotor plasticity during vestibular compensation does not depend on cerebellar LTD

Michael Faulstich1, Arjan M van Alphen2, C. Luo2, Sascha du Lac1*, and Chris I De Zeeuw1

1 Systems Neurobiology, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States
2 Neuroscience, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sascha{at}salk.edu.

Vestibular paradigms are widely used for investigating mechanisms underlying cerebellar motor learning. These include adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) following visual-vestibular mismatch training and vestibular compensation following unilateral damage to the vestibular apparatus. To date, various studies have shown that VOR adaptation may be supported by long-term depression (LTD) at the parallel fiber to Purkinje cell synapse. Yet, it is unknown to what extent vestibular compensation may depend on this cellular process. Here, we investigated adaptive gain changes in the VOR and optokinetic reflex during vestibular compensation in transgenic mice in which LTD is specifically blocked in Purkinje cells via expression of a peptide inhibitor of protein kinase C (L7-PKCi mutants). The results demonstrate that neither the strength nor the time course of vestibular compensation are affected by the absence of LTD. In contrast, analysis of vestibular compensation in spontaneous mutants that lack a functional olivo-cerebellar circuit (lurchers) shows that this form of motor learning is severely impaired. We conclude that oculomotor plasticity during vestibular compensation depends critically on intact cerebellar circuitry, but not on the occurrence of cerebellar LTD.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Beraneck, J. L. McKee, M. Aleisa, and K. E. Cullen
Asymmetric Recovery in Cerebellar-Deficient Mice Following Unilateral Labyrinthectomy
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 945 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Beraneck and K. E. Cullen
Activity of Vestibular Nuclei Neurons During Vestibular and Optokinetic Stimulation in the Alert Mouse
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1549 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.