JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 20, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00045.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/513    most recent
00045.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joshi, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Leigh, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joshi, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Leigh, R. J.
Submitted on January 15, 2009
Revised on May 14, 2009
Accepted on May 15, 2009

Effects of Vergence on Human Ocular Following Responses (OFR)

Anand C Joshi1, Matthew J Thurtell, Mark F Walker1, Alessandro Serra, and R. John Leigh1*

1 Case Western Reserve University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rjl4{at}case.edu.

The human ocular following response (OFR) is a pre-attentive, short-latency visual field-holding mechanism, which is enhanced if the moving stimulus is applied in the wake of a saccade. Since most natural gaze shifts incorporate both saccadic and vergence components, we asked whether the OFR was also enhanced during vergence. Ten subjects viewed vertically moving sine-wave gratings on a video monitor at 45 cm that had a temporal frequency of 16.7 Hz, contrast of 32%, and spatial frequency of 0.17, 0.27 or 0.44 cycles/°. In fixation/OFR experiments, subjects fixed upon a white central dot on the video monitor, which disappeared at the beginning of each trial, just as the sinusoidal grating started moving up or down. We measured the change in eye position in the 70 - 150 ms, open-loop interval following stimulus onset. Group mean downward responses were larger (0.14°) and made at shorter latency (85 ms) than upward responses (0.10° and 96 ms). The direction of eye drifts during control trials, when gratings remained stationary, was unrelated to the prior response. During vergence/OFR experiments, subjects switched their fixation point between the white dot at 45 cm and a red spot at 15 cm, cued by disappearance of one target and appearance of the other. When horizontal vergence velocity exceeded 15° /s, motion of sinusoidal gratings commenced and elicited the vertical OFR. Subjects showed significantly (p < 0.001) larger OFR when the moving stimulus was presented during convergence (group mean increase of 46%) or divergence (group mean increase of 36%) compared with following fixation. Since gaze shifts between near and far are common during natural activities, we postulate that the increase of OFR during vergence movements reflects enhancement of early cortical motion processing, which serves to stabilize the visual field as the eyes approach their new fixation point.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.