JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 18, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00061.2009 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/2693    most recent
00061.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lisberger, S. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lisberger, S. G
Submitted on January 21, 2009
Accepted on February 16, 2009

Relationship between adapted neural population responses in MT and motion adaptation in speed and direction of smooth pursuit eye movements

Jin Yang and Stephen G Lisberger1*

1 UCSF

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sgl{at}phy.ucsf.edu.

We have asked how sensory adaptation is represented the response of a population of visual motion neurons, and whether the neural adaptation could drive behavioral adaptation. Our approach was to evaluate the effects of ~10 seconds of motion adaptation on both smooth pursuit eye movements and the responses of neuron populations in extrastriate area MT in awake monkeys. Stimuli for neural recordings consisted of patches of 100% correlated dot textures. There was a wide range of effects across neurons, but on average adaptation reduced the amplitude and width of the direction tuning curves of MT neurons, without large changes in preferred direction. The effects were largest when the direction of the adapting stimulus corresponded to the preferred direction of the MT neuron under study. Adaptation also reduced the amplitude of speed tuning curves, again with the largest effect when adapting speed was equal to preferred speed. The adapted tuning curves were shifted toward lower preferred speeds as adapting speed increased. We constructed populations of model MT neurons based on our experimental sample, and showed that the effects of adaptation on the direction and speed of pursuit eye movements were predicted when a variant of vector averaging decoded the responses of a subset of the neural population. We conclude that the effects of motion adaptation on the responses of MT neurons can support behavioral adaptation in pursuit eye movements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. C. Osborne and S. G. Lisberger
Spatial and Temporal Integration of Visual Motion Signals for Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2013 - 2025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.