JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol (March 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00063.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3562    most recent
00063.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomchik, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Lu, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomchik, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Lu, Z.
Submitted on January 18, 2006
Accepted on March 18, 2006

Modulation of auditory signal-to-noise ratios by efferent stimulation

Seth M Tomchik1* and Zhongmin Lu1

1 Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States; Neuroscience Program, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States; NIEHS Marine and Freshwater Biomedical Sciences Center, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Miami, Florida, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stomchik{at}bio.miami.edu.

One of the primary challenges that sensory systems face is extracting relevant information from background noise. In the auditory system, the ear receives efferent feedback, which may help it extract signals from noise. Here we directly test the hypothesis that efferent activity increases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the ear, using the relatively simple teleost ear. Tone-evoked saccular potentials were recorded before and after efferent stimulation, and the SNR of the responses was calculated. In quiet conditions efferent stimulation suppressed saccular responses to a tone, reducing the SNR. However, when masking noise was added, efferent stimulation increased the SNR of the saccular responses within a range of stimulus combinations. These data demonstrate that auditory efferent feedback can increase SNR in conditions where a signal is masked by noise, thereby enhancing the encoding of signals in noise. Efferent feedback thus performs a fundamental signal processing function, helping the animal to hear sounds in difficult listening conditions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Sisneros
Seasonal Plasticity of Auditory Saccular Sensitivity in the Vocal Plainfin Midshipman Fish, Porichthys notatus
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1121 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
C. Grataloup, M. Hoen, E. Veuillet, L. Collet, F. Pellegrino, and F. Meunier
Speech Restoration: An Interactive Process
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 827 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.