| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mark.stokes{at}mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a unique method in neuroscience used to stimulate focal regions of the human brain. As TMS gains popularity in experimental and clinical domains, techniques for controlling the extent of brain stimulation are becoming increasingly important. At present, TMS intensity is typically calibrated to the excitability of the human motor cortex, a measure referred to as motor threshold. Although TMS is commonly applied to non-motor regions, most applications do not consider the effect of changes in distance between the stimulating device and underlying neural tissue. Here we show that for every millimeter from the stimulating coil, an additional 3% of TMS output is required to induce an equivalent level of brain stimulation at the motor cortex. This abrupt spatial gradient will have crucial consequences when TMS is applied to non-motor regions because of substantial variance in scalp-cortex distances over different regions of the head. Stimulation protocols that do not account for cortical distance therefore risk substantial under-, or over-stimulation. We describe a simple method for adjusting motor threshold to account for variations in cortical distance, thus providing a more accurate calibration than unadjusted MT for the safe and effective application of TMS in clinical and experimental neuroscience.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. C. Ruff, S. Bestmann, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, O. Josephs, N. Weiskopf, R. Deichmann, and J. Driver Distinct Causal Influences of Parietal Versus Frontal Areas on Human Visual Cortex: Evidence from Concurrent TMS-fMRI Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 817 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. D. Chambers, M. A. Bellgrove, I. C. Gould, T. English, H. Garavan, E. McNaught, M. Kamke, and J. B. Mattingley Dissociable Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Prefrontal and Premotor Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3638 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Feredoes, G. Tononi, and B. R. Postle The Neural Bases of the Short-Term Storage of Verbal Information Are Anatomically Variable across Individuals J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 11003 - 11008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. O'Shea, N. G. Muggleton, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh Human Frontal Eye Fields and Spatial Priming of Pop-out. J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1140 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Del Olmo, B. Cheeran, G. Koch, and J. C. Rothwell Role of the Cerebellum in Externally Paced Rhythmic Finger Movements J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. Morris, C. D. Chambers, and J. B. Mattingley Parietal stimulation destabilizes spatial updating across saccadic eye movements PNAS, May 22, 2007; 104(21): 9069 - 9074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Chang and T. Ro Maintenance of visual stability in the human posterior parietal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 266 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Chambers, M. A. Bellgrove, M. G. Stokes, T. R. Henderson, H. Garavan, I. H. Robertson, A. P. Morris, and J. B. Mattingley Executive "Brake Failure" following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe. J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 444 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
