JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 8, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00091.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/69    most recent
00091.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sieling, F. H
Right arrow Articles by Prinz, A. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sieling, F. H
Right arrow Articles by Prinz, A. A
Submitted on January 30, 2009
Revised on March 30, 2009
Accepted on April 3, 2009

Predictions of phase-locking in excitatory hybrid networks: Excitation does not promote phase-locking in pattern generating networks as reliably as inhibition

Fred H Sieling1*, Carmen C. Canavier2, and Astrid A Prinz3

1 Georgia Inst. of Tech. and Emory Univ.
2 Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
3 Emory University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fred.sieling{at}bme.gatech.edu.

Phase-locked activity is thought to underlie many high-level functions of the nervous system, the simplest of which are produced by central pattern generators (CPGs). It is not known whether we can define a theoretical framework that is sufficiently general to predict phase-locking in actual biological CPGs, nor is it known why the CPGs that have been characterized are dominated by inhibition. Previously, we applied a method based on phase response curves (PRCs) measured using inputs of biologically realistic amplitude and duration to predict the existence and stability of 1:1 phase-locked modes in hybrid networks of one biological and one model bursting neuron reciprocally connected with artificial inhibitory synapses. Here we extend this analysis to excitatory coupling. Using the Pyloric Dilator neuron from the Stomatogastric Ganglion of the American Lobster as our biological cell, we experimentally prepared 86 networks using 5 biological neurons, 4 model neurons, and heterogeneous synapse strengths between 1 and 10,000nS. In 77% of networks, our method was robust to biological noise and accurately predicted the phasic relationships. In 3%, our method was inaccurate. The remaining 20% were not amenable to analysis because our theoretical assumptions were violated. The high failure rate for excitation compared to inhibition was due to differential effects of noise and feedback on excitatory versus inhibitory coupling, and suggests that CPGs dominated by excitatory synapses would require precise tuning to function, which may explain why CPGs rely primarily on inhibitory synapses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Cui, C. C. Canavier, and R. J. Butera
Functional Phase Response Curves: A Method for Understanding Synchronization of Adapting Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.