JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol (April 30, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00111.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/3/1556    most recent
00111.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minnery, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Simons, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minnery, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Simons, D. J.
Submitted on February 5, 2003
Accepted on April 25, 2003

Response transformation and receptive field synthesis in the lemniscal trigeminothalamic circuit

Brandon S. Minnery, Randy M. Bruno, and Daniel J. Simons*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cortex{at}pitt.edu.

In order to understand how the lemniscal trigeminothalamic circuit (PrV{Rightarrow}VPM) of the rodent whisker-to-barrel pathway transforms afferent signals, we applied ramp-and-hold deflections to individual whiskers of lightly narcotized rats while recording the extracellular responses of neurons in either the ventroposterior medial thalamic nucleus (VPM) or in brainstem nucleus principalis (PrV). In PrV, only those neurons antidromically determined to project to VPM were selected for recording. We found that VPM neurons exhibited smaller response magnitudes and greater spontaneous firing rates than their PrV inputs, but that both populations were similarly well tuned for stimulus direction. In addition, fewer VPM (74%) than PrV neurons (93%) responded with sustained, or tonic, discharges during the plateau phase of the stimulus. Neurons in both populations responded most robustly to deflections of a single, "principal whisker" (PW), and the majority of cells in both PrV (90%) and VPM (73%) also responded to deflections of at least one adjacent whisker (AW). AW responses in both nuclei occurred on average at longer latencies and were more temporally dispersed than PW responses. Lateral inhibition, as evidenced by AW-evoked activity suppression, was rare in PrV but prevalent in VPM. In both nuclei, however, suppression was weak, with AW responses being on average excitatory. Our results suggest that the receptive field structures and response properties of individual VPM neurons can be explained in large part by input from one or a small number of PrV neurons, but that intrathalamic mechanisms act to further transform the afferent signal.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Hirata and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Cortical Transformation of Wide-Field (Multiwhisker) Sensory Responses
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 358 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Bokor, L. Acsady, and M. Deschenes
Vibrissal Responses of Thalamic Cells That Project to the Septal Columns of the Barrel Cortex and to the Second Somatosensory Area
J. Neurosci., May 14, 2008; 28(20): 5169 - 5177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Li and F. F. Ebner
Cortical Modulation of Spatial and Angular Tuning Maps in the Rat Thalamus
J. Neurosci., January 3, 2007; 27(1): 167 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. C. Leiser and K. A. Moxon
Relationship Between Physiological Response Type (RA and SA) and Vibrissal Receptive Field of Neurons Within the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 3129 - 3145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Hirata, J. Aguilar, and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Noradrenergic activation amplifies bottom-up and top-down signal-to-noise ratios in sensory thalamus.
J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4426 - 4436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. R. Aguilar and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Spatiotemporal Gating of Sensory Inputs in Thalamus during Quiescent and Activated States
J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10990 - 11002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Timofeeva, C. Dufresne, A. Sik, Z.-W. Zhang, and M. Deschenes
Cholinergic Modulation of Vibrissal Receptive Fields in Trigeminal Nuclei
J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9135 - 9143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Higley and D. Contreras
Integration of Synaptic Responses to Neighboring Whiskers in Rat Barrel Cortex In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1920 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Timofeeva, P. Lavallee, D. Arsenault, and M. Deschenes
Synthesis of Multiwhisker-Receptive Fields in Subcortical Stations of the Vibrissa System
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1510 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.-H. Lee and D. J. Simons
Angular Tuning and Velocity Sensitivity in Different Neuron Classes Within Layer 4 of Rat Barrel Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 223 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Timofeeva, C. Merette, C. Emond, P. Lavallee, and M. Deschenes
A Map of Angular Tuning Preference in Thalamic Barreloids
J. Neurosci., November 19, 2003; 23(33): 10717 - 10723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.