JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00112.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3712    most recent
00112.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barthelemy, F.
Right arrow Articles by Masson, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barthelemy, F.
Right arrow Articles by Masson, G. S.
Submitted on February 1, 2006
Accepted on March 7, 2006

A behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions

Frederic Barthelemy1, Ivo Vanzetta1, and Guillaume S. Masson1*

1 CNRS UMR6193, Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives de la Mediterranee, Marseille, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: guillaume.masson{at}incm.cnrs-mrs.fr.

Visual neurons integrate information over a finite part of the visual field with high selectivity. This classical receptive field is modulated by peripheral inputs, which play a role in both neuronal response normalization and contextual modulations. However, the consequences of these properties for visuo-motor transformations are yet incompletely understood. To explore those, we recorded short-latency ocular following responses in humans to large center-only and center-surround stimuli. We found that eye movements are triggered by a mechanism that integrates motion over a restricted portion of the visual field, the size of which depends on stimulus-contrast and increases as a function of time after response onset. We also found evidence for a strong non-isodirectional center-surround organization, responsible for normalizing the central, driving input so that motor responses are set to their most linear contrast dynamics. Such response normalization is delayed ~20ms relative to tracking onset, gradually builds-up over time and is partly tuned for surround orientation/direction. These results outline the spatio-temporal organization of a behavioral receptive field, which might reflect a linear integration among sub-populations of cortical visual motion detectors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Spering and K. R. Gegenfurtner
Contextual Effects on Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1353 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.