JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 29, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00126.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/119    most recent
00126.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rigas, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castro-Alamancos, M. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rigas, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castro-Alamancos, M. A
Submitted on February 12, 2009
Revised on April 17, 2009
Accepted on April 21, 2009

Impact of persistent cortical activity (Up states) on synaptic inputs

Pavlos Rigas1 and Manuel A Castro-Alamancos2*

1 Drexel University
2 Drexel University Coll Med

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcastro{at}drexelmed.edu.

The neocortex generates short epochs of persistent activity called Up states, which are associated with changes in cellular and network excitability. Using somatosensory thalamocortical slices, we studied the impact of persistent cortical activity during spontaneous Up states on intrinsic cellular excitability (input resistance) and on excitatory synaptic inputs of cortical cells. At the intrinsic excitability level, we found that the expected decrease in input resistance (high conductance) resulting from synaptic barrages during Up states is counteracted by an increase in input resistance due to depolarization per se. The result is a variable but on average relatively small reduction in input resistance during Up states. At the synaptic level, Up states enhanced a late synaptic component of short-latency thalamocortical field potential responses but suppressed intracortical field potential responses. The thalamocortical enhancement did not reflect an increase in synaptic strength, as determined by measuring the evoked postsynaptic current, but instead an increase in evoked action potential (spike) probability due to depolarization during Up states. In contrast, the intracortical suppression was associated with a reduction in synaptic strength, apparently driven by increased presynaptic intracortical activity during up states. In addition, intracortical suppression also reflected a reduction in evoked spike latency caused by depolarization and the abolishment of longer latency spikes caused by stronger inhibitory drive during Up states. In conclusion, depolarization during Up states increases the success of excitatory synaptic inputs to reach firing. However, activity-dependent synaptic depression caused by increased presynaptic firing during Up states and the enhancement of evoked inhibitory drive caused by depolarization suppress excitatory intracortical synaptic inputs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.