JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 15, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00132.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/2603    most recent
00132.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuhs, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Touretzky, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuhs, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Touretzky, D. S.
Submitted on February 7, 2005
Accepted on June 4, 2005

Influence of Path Integration vs. Environmental Orientation on Place Cell Remapping Between Visually Identical Environments

Mark C. Fuhs, Shea R. VanRhoads, Amanda E. Casale, Bruce McNaughton, and David S. Touretzky*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dst{at}cs.cmu.edu.

To assess the effects of interactions between angular path integration and visual landmarks on the firing of hippocampal neurons, we recorded from CA1 pyramidal cells as rats foraged in two identical boxes with polarizing internal cues. In the same-orientation condition, following an earlier experiment by Skaggs and McNaughton (1998), the boxes were oriented identically and connected by a corridor. In the opposite-orientation condition, the boxes were abutted by rotating them by 90° in opposite directions, so that their orientations differed by 180°. After 16-23 days of pretraining on the same orientation condition, three rats experienced both conditions in counterbalanced order on each of two consecutive days. On the third day they ran two opposite-orientation trials. While Skaggs and McNaughton observed stable partial "remapping" of place fields, none of the fields in this experiment remapped in the same-orientation condition. In the opposite-orientation condition, place fields in the first box were isomorphic with those in the same-orientation condition, while in the second box the rats eventually exhibited completely different fields. The rats differed as to the trial in which this first occurred. Once the second box exhibited different fields, it continued to do so in all subsequent opposite-orientation trials, yet fields remained the same in subsequent same-orientation trials. The results demonstrate that when animals move actively between environments, and are hence potentially able to maintain their inertial angular orientation, discordance between environmental orientation and the rat's idiothetic direction sense can profoundly affect the hippocampal map -either immediately, or as a result of cumulative experience.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.