JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 6, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00132.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1405    most recent
00132.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lefevre, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lefevre, P.
Submitted on February 6, 2007
Accepted on June 4, 2007

Target acceleration can be extracted and represented within the predictive drive to ocular pursuit

Simon James Bennett1*, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry2, Graham Robert Barnes3, and Philippe Lefevre2

1 RISES, Liverpool John Moores, Liverpool, United Kingdom
2 CESAME, UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
3 Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.j.bennett{at}ljmu.ac.uk.

Given sufficient exposure to stimulus presentation, the oculomotor system generates a representation of the stimulus characteristics, which is then used to predict the upcoming target motion. In addition to compensating for the perceptual-motor delay, these predictive processes perpetuate eye motion during a transient occlusion and compensate for the loss of visual input. At present, however, it is not well understood whether and how the oculomotor system extracts and represents target acceleration for subsequent predictive control. To this end, we used a target occlusion paradigm where both position and velocity of the target during the occlusion and at reappearance could not be predicted without extracting target acceleration prior to target disappearance. We found that the oculomotor response during the blanking period was not influenced by target acceleration when the initial exposure was 200ms. However, smooth and saccadic eye movements did discriminate between the different levels of acceleration following an initial 500 or 800 ms exposure. In the event that the smooth response during the occlusion did not match well the target trajectory and hence eliminate a developing displacement error, there was an increased saccadic displacement. Still, the combined response during the blanking period did not eliminate retinal slip and position error at target reappearance. These results indicate that information on target acceleration can be extracted on-line, during pursuit of a visible ramp and then used to drive a predictive oculomotor response in the absence of visual input.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. R. Barnes and C. J. S. Collins
The Influence of Briefly Presented Randomized Target Motion on the Extraretinal Component of Ocular Pursuit
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 831 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Heinen
Oculomotor Hide and Seek: Pursuing an Accelerating Target Behind an Occluder. Focus on "Target Acceleration Can Be Extracted and Represented Within the Predictive Drive to Ocular Pursuit"
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1073 - 1074.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.