JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 16, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00152.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/1/63    most recent
00152.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, S. E
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. D
Submitted on February 9, 2007
Accepted on May 10, 2007

The effects of inhibitory gain and conductance fluctuations in a simple model for contrast invariant orientation tuning in cat V1

Stephanie E Palmer1* and Kenneth D Miller2

1 Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States; , United States
2 Columbia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sepalmer{at}princeton.edu.

The origin of orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex (V1) is a model problem for understanding cerebral cortical circuitry. A key constraint is that orientation tuning width is invariant under changes in stimulus contrast. We have previously shown that this can arise from the combination of feedforward LGN input and an orientation-untuned component of feedforward inhibition that dominates excitation. However, these models did not include the large background voltage noise observed in vivo. Here, we include this noise and examine a simple model of cat V1 response. Constraining our simulations to fit physiological data, our single model parameter is the strength of feedforward inhibition relative to LGN excitation. With physiological noise, the contrast-invariance of orientation tuning depends little on inhibition level, although very weak or very strong inhibition lead to weak broadening or sharpening, respectively of tuning with contrast. For any inhibition level the circular variance decreases with contrast as observed experimentally. These results arise primarily because the voltage noise causes large inputs to be much more strongly amplified than small ones in evoking spiking responses. However, inhibition comparable to or stronger than excitation appears necessary to suppress spiking responses to non-preferred orientations to the extent seen in vivo and to allow the emergence of a tuned mean voltage response. These two response properties provide the strongest constraints on model details. Antiphase inhibition from inhibitory simple cells, and not just untuned inhibition from inhibitory complex cells, appears necessary to fully explain these aspects of cortical orientation tuning.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. R. Wilson, M. T. Ty, D. E. Ingber, M. Sur, and G. Liu
Synaptic Reorganization in Scaled Networks of Controlled Size
J. Neurosci., December 12, 2007; 27(50): 13581 - 13589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.