JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 31, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00158.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/5/3368    most recent
00158.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rollenhagen, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rollenhagen, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, C. R.
Submitted on February 14, 2005
Accepted on May 28, 2005

Low Frequency Oscillations Arising from Competitive Interactions between Visual Stimuli in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex

Julianne E. Rollenhagen and Carl R. Olson*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: colson{at}cnbc.cmu.edu.

Some neurons in the inferotemporal cortex (IT) of the macaque monkey respond to visual stimuli by firing action potentials in a series of sharply defined bursts at a frequency of approximately 5 Hz. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the oscillatory responses of these neurons depend on competitive interactions with other neurons selective for different stimuli. To test this hypothesis, we monitored responses to probe images displayed in the presence of other already visible backdrop images. Two stimuli were used in testing each neuron: a foveal image which, when displayed alone, elicited an excitatory response (the "object") and a peripheral image which, when displayed alone, elicited little or no activity (the "flanker"). We assessed the results of presenting these images separately and together in monkeys trained to maintain central fixation. Two novel phenomena emerged. First, displaying the object in the presence of the flanker enhanced the strength of the oscillatory component of the response to the object. This effect varied in strength across task contexts and thus may have depended on the monkey's allocating attention to the flanker. Second, displaying the flanker in the presence of the object gave rise to sometimes strong oscillations in which the initial phase was negative. This was all the more striking because the flanker by itself elicited little or no response. This effect was robust and invariant across task contexts. These results can be accounted for by competition between two neuronal populations, one selective for the object and the other for the flanker, if it is assumed that the visual responses of each population are subject to fatigue.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Mirpour and H. Esteky
State-Dependent Effects of Stimulus Presentation Duration on the Temporal Dynamics of Neural Responses in the Inferotemporal Cortex of Macaque Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1790 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga
Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2158 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Moldakarimov, J. E. Rollenhagen, C. R. Olson, and C. C. Chow
Competitive Dynamics in Cortical Responses to Visual Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3388 - 3396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.