JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 29, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00162.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/214    most recent
00162.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuckel, J.
Right arrow Articles by French, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schuckel, J.
Right arrow Articles by French, A. S.
Submitted on February 24, 2009
Revised on April 9, 2009
Accepted on April 14, 2009

Two interacting olfactory transduction mechanisms have linked polarities and dynamics in <I>Drosophila melanogaster</I> antennal basiconic sensilla neurons

Julia Schuckel1, Paivi H Torkkeli1, and Andrew S. French1*

1 Dalhousie University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andrew.french{at}dal.ca.

We measured frequency response functions between concentrations of fruit odorants and individual action potentials in large basiconic sensilla of the <I>Drosophila melanogaster</I> <I>antenna</I>. A new method of randomly varying odorant concentration was combined with rapid, continuous measurement of concentration at the antenna by a miniature photoionization detector. All frequency responses decreased progressively at frequencies approaching 100 Hz, providing an upper limit for the dynamics of Drosophila olfaction. We found two distinct response patterns: excitatory band-pass frequency responses were seen with ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate and hexanol, while inhibitory low-pass responses were seen with methyl salicylate and phenylethyl acetate. Band-pass responses peaked at 1-10 Hz. Frequency responses could be well fitted by simple linear filter equations, and the fitted parameters were consistent within each of the two types of responses. Experiments with equal mixtures of excitatory and inhibitory odorants gave responses that were characteristic of the inhibitory components, indicating that interaction during transduction causes inhibitory odorants to suppress the responses to excitatory odorants. Plots of response amplitude versus odorant concentration indicated that the odorant concentrations used were within approximately linear regions of the dose response relationships. We also estimated linear information capacity from the coherence function of each recording. Although coherence was relatively high, indicating a large signal-to-noise ratio, information capacity for olfaction was much lower than comparable estimates for mechanotransduction or visual transduction because of the limited bandwidth of olfaction. These data offer new insights into transduction by primary chemoreceptors, and place temporal constraints on <I>Drosophila</I> olfactory behavior.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.