JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 22, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00164.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/2207    most recent
00164.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shiller, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ostry, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shiller, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ostry, D. J.
Submitted on February 15, 2005
Accepted on June 14, 2005

Voluntary Control of Human Jaw Stiffness

Douglas M. Shiller1, Guillaume Houle1, and David J. Ostry2*

1 Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
2 Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ostry{at}motion.psych.mcgill.ca.

Recent studies of human arm movement have suggested that the control of stiffness may be important both for maintaining stability and for achieving differences in movement accuracy. In the present study, we have examined the voluntary control of postural stiffness in 3D in the human jaw. The goal is to address the possible role of stiffness control in both stabilizing the jaw and in achieving the differential precision requirements of speech sounds. We have previously shown that patterns of kinematic variability in speech are systematically related to the stiffness of the jaw. If the nervous system uses stiffness control as a means to regulate kinematic variation in speech, it should also be possible to show that subjects can modify jaw stiffness voluntarily. Using a robotic device, a series of force pulses was applied to the jaw in order to elicit changes in stiffness to resist displacement. Three orthogonal directions and three magnitudes of forces were tested. In all conditions, subjects increased the magnitude of jaw stiffness in order to resist the effects of the applied forces. Apart from the horizontal direction, greater increases in stiffness were observed when larger forces were applied. Moreover, subjects differentially increased jaw stiffness along a vertical axis to counteract disturbances in this direction. The observed changes in the magnitude of stiffness in different directions suggest an ability to control the pattern of stiffness of the jaw. The results are interpreted as evidence that jaw stiffness can be adjusted voluntarily, and thus may play a role in stabilizing the jaw and in controlling movement variation in the orofacial system.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
R. W. Steeve, C. A. Moore, J. R. Green, K. J. Reilly, and J. Ruark McMurtrey
Babbling, Chewing, and Sucking: Oromandibular Coordination at 9 Months
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1390 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. M. Seibel and S. M. Barlow
Automatic Measurement of Nonparticipatory Stiffness in the Perioral Complex
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1272 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.