JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 25, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00166.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/1962    most recent
00166.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pallas, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pallas, S. L.
Submitted on February 15, 2005
Accepted on May 23, 2005

Visual experience is necessary for maintenance but not development of receptive fields in superior colliculus

Maria M. Carrasco1, Khaleel A. Razak1, and Sarah L. Pallas1*

1 Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: spallas{at}gsu.edu.

Sensory deprivation is thought to have an adverse effect on visual development and to prolong the critical period for plasticity. Once the animal reaches adulthood, however, synaptic connectivity is understood to be largely stable. We reported previously that NMDA receptor blockade in superior colliculus of the Syrian hamster prevents refinement of receptive fields (RFs) in normal or compressed retinotopic projections, resulting in target neurons with enlarged RFs but normal stimulus tuning. Here we asked whether visually driven activity is necessary for refinement or maintenance of retinotopic maps or if spontaneous activity is sufficient. Animals were deprived of light either in adulthood only or from birth until the time of recording. We found that dark rearing from birth to two months of age had no effect on the timing and extent of RF refinement as assessed with single unit extracellular recordings. Visual deprivation in adulthood also had no effect. Continuous dark rearing from birth into adulthood, however, resulted in a progressive loss of refinement, resulting in enlarged, asymmetric receptive fields and altered surround suppression in adulthood. Thus, unlike in visual cortex, early visually driven activity is not necessary for refinement of receptive fields during development, but is required to maintain refined visual projections in adulthood. Because the map can refine normally in the dark, these results argue against a deprivation-induced delay in critical period closure, and suggest instead that early visual deprivation leaves target neurons more vulnerable to deprivation that continues after refinement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. M. Hooks and C. Chen
Vision Triggers an Experience-Dependent Sensitive Period at the Retinogeniculate Synapse
J. Neurosci., April 30, 2008; 28(18): 4807 - 4817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. A. Razak, M. D. Richardson, and Z. M. Fuzessery
Experience is required for the maintenance and refinement of FM sweep selectivity in the developing auditory cortex
PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4465 - 4470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. A. Razak and S. L. Pallas
Inhibitory Plasticity Facilitates Recovery of Stimulus Velocity Tuning in the Superior Colliculus after Chronic NMDA Receptor Blockade
J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7275 - 7283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. L. Pallas, P. Wenner, C. Gonzalez-Islas, M. Fagiolini, K. A. Razak, G. Kim, D. Sanes, and B. Roerig
Developmental Plasticity of Inhibitory Circuitry
J. Neurosci., October 11, 2006; 26(41): 10358 - 10361.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.