|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Computational Neuroscience, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California, United States; Neurobiology & Anatomy, U Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States
2 Neurobiology & Anatomy, U Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: anne.b.sereno{at}uth.tmc.edu.
Ventral and dorsal visual pathways perform fundamentally different functions. The former is involved in object recognition, whereas the latter carries out spatial localization of stimuli and visual guidance of motor actions. Despite the association of the dorsal pathway with spatial vision, recent studies have reported shape selectivity in the dorsal stream. We compared shape encoding in anterior inferotemporal cortex, a high-level ventral area, with that in lateral intraparietal cortex, a high-level dorsal area, during a fixation task. We found shape selectivities of individual neurons to be greater in AIT than in LIP. At the neural population level, responses to different shapes were more dissimilar in AIT than LIP. Both observations suggest a greater capacity in AIT for making finer shape distinctions. Multivariate analyses of AIT data grouped together similar shapes based on neural population responses, while such grouping was indistinct in LIP. Thus, in a first comparison of shape response properties in late stages of the two visual pathways, we report that AIT exhibited greater capability than LIP for both object discrimination and generalization. These differences in the two visual pathways provide the first neurophysiological evidence that shape encoding in the dorsal pathway is distinct from and not a mere duplication of that formed in the ventral pathway. In addition to shape selectivity, we observed stimulus-driven cognitive effects in both areas. Stimulus repetition suppression in LIP was similar to the well-known repetition suppression in AIT, and may be associated with the "inhibition of return" memory effect observed during reflexive attention.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Janssen, S. Srivastava, S. Ombelet, and G. A. Orban Coding of Shape and Position in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area J. Neurosci., June 25, 2008; 28(26): 6679 - 6690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kiani, H. Esteky, K. Mirpour, and K. Tanaka Object Category Structure in Response Patterns of Neuronal Population in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4296 - 4309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |