|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
3 Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: strickp{at}pitt.edu.
Skilled use of tools requires us to learn an "input-output map" for the device, i.e., how our movements relate to the actions of the device. We used the paradigm of visuo-motor rotation to examine two questions about the plasticity of input-output maps: 1) does extensive practice on one mapping make it difficult to modify and/or to form a new input-output map; and 2) once a map has been modified or a new map has been formed, does this map survive a gap in performance? Humans and monkeys made wrist movements to control the position of a cursor on a computer monitor. Humans practiced the task for ~1.5 hrs; monkeys practiced for 3-9 yrs. After this practice, we gradually altered the direction of cursor movement relative to wrist movement while subjects moved either to a single target or to 4 targets. Subjects were unaware of the change in cursor-movement relationship. Despite their prior practice on the task, the humans and the monkeys quickly adjusted their motor output to compensate for the visuo-motor rotation. Monkeys retained the modified input-output map during a 2 week gap in motor performance. Humans retained the altered map during a gap of > 1 year. Our results demonstrate that sensorimotor performance remains flexible despite considerable practice on a specific task, and even relatively short-term exposure to a new input-output mapping leads to a long-lasting change in motor performance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Zarahn, G. D. Weston, J. Liang, P. Mazzoni, and J. W. Krakauer Explaining Savings for Visuomotor Adaptation: Linear Time-Invariant State-Space Models Are Not Sufficient J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2537 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |