JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 23, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00209.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/2797    most recent
00209.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Strick, P. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Strick, P. L
Submitted on February 27, 2006
Accepted on August 18, 2006

Rapid and Long-lasting Plasticity of Input-Output Mapping

Kenji Yamamoto1, Donna S Hoffman2, and Peter L Strick3*

1 Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
3 Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: strickp{at}pitt.edu.

Skilled use of tools requires us to learn an "input-output map" for the device, i.e., how our movements relate to the actions of the device. We used the paradigm of visuo-motor rotation to examine two questions about the plasticity of input-output maps: 1) does extensive practice on one mapping make it difficult to modify and/or to form a new input-output map; and 2) once a map has been modified or a new map has been formed, does this map survive a gap in performance? Humans and monkeys made wrist movements to control the position of a cursor on a computer monitor. Humans practiced the task for ~1.5 hrs; monkeys practiced for 3-9 yrs. After this practice, we gradually altered the direction of cursor movement relative to wrist movement while subjects moved either to a single target or to 4 targets. Subjects were unaware of the change in cursor-movement relationship. Despite their prior practice on the task, the humans and the monkeys quickly adjusted their motor output to compensate for the visuo-motor rotation. Monkeys retained the modified input-output map during a 2 week gap in motor performance. Humans retained the altered map during a gap of > 1 year. Our results demonstrate that sensorimotor performance remains flexible despite considerable practice on a specific task, and even relatively short-term exposure to a new input-output mapping leads to a long-lasting change in motor performance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Zarahn, G. D. Weston, J. Liang, P. Mazzoni, and J. W. Krakauer
Explaining Savings for Visuomotor Adaptation: Linear Time-Invariant State-Space Models Are Not Sufficient
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2537 - 2548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.