JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00212.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1278    most recent
00212.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mokin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keifer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mokin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keifer, J.
Submitted on February 27, 2007
Accepted on June 25, 2007

CONVERSION OF SILENT SYNAPSES INTO THE ACTIVE POOL BY SELECTIVE GLUR1-3 AND GLUR4 AMPAR TRAFFICKING DURING IN VITRO CLASSICAL CONDITIONING

Maxim Mokin1, Zhaoqing Zheng, and Joyce Keifer1*

1 Neuroscience Group, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, South Dakota, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jkeifer{at}usd.edu.

The conversion of silent synapses into active sites is hypothesized to be a primary mechanism underlying learning and memory processes. Here, we used an in vitro model of classical conditioning from turtles that demonstrates a neural correlate of eyeblink conditioning to examine whether the conversion of silent synapses has a role in this form of associative learning. This was accomplished by direct visualization of AMPAR and NMDAR subunits colocalized with synaptophysin (Syn) using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. In naive preparations, there was a relatively high level of synapses immunopositive for NR1-Syn alone interpretated to be silent synapses. After early stages of conditioning during acquisition of conditioned responses (CRs), there was a significant increase in the colocalization of GluR1-3 AMPAR subunits at NR1-immunopositive synaptic sites. Later in conditioning, levels of GluR1-3 declined and enhanced colocalization of GluR4-containing AMPAR subunits at synapses was observed. The trafficking of these subunits during conditioning was NMDAR-mediated and was accompanied by protein synthesis of GluR4 subunits. Examination of the PSD fraction confirmed the early and late synaptic insertion of GluR1-3 and GluR4, respectively, during conditioning. These findings suggest that there is differential trafficking of synaptic AMPARs during classical conditioning. Existing GluR1-3 AMPAR subunits are initially delivered to silent synapses early in conditioning to unsilence them followed by synthesis and insertion of GluR4 AMPAR subunits that are required for acquisition and expression of CRs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.