JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 24, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00214.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/1959    most recent
00214.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kogo, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kogo, N.
Submitted on March 3, 2004
Accepted on November 17, 2004

Shunting Inhibition in Accessory Optic System Neurons

Michael Ariel* and Naoki Kogo

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arielm{at}slu.edu.

The interaction of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the accessory optic system was studied with whole-cell recordings in the turtle basal optic nucleus. Previous studies have shown the visual patterns, drifting in the same preferred direction, evoke excitatory and inhibitory post-synaptic events simultaneously (Ariel and Kogo 2001). Analysis of the reversal potentials for these events and their pharmacological profile suggest that they are mediated by AMPA and GABAA receptors, respectively (Kogo et al. 2002). Here, neurons were recorded to study non-linear interaction between excitatory and inhibitory responses evoked by electrical microstimulation of the retina and pretectum, respectively. The responses to coincident activation of excitatory and inhibitory inputs exhibited membrane shunting in that the excitatory response amplitude, adjusted for changes in driving force, was attenuated during the onset of the inhibitory response. This non-linear interaction was seen in many but not all stimulus pairings. In some cases, attenuation was followed by an augmentation of the excitatory response. For comparison, the size of the excitatory response was evaluated during a hyperpolarizing current pulse that directly modulated voltage-sensitive channels of a slow rectifying Ih current. Injection of hyperpolarizing current did not cause the attenuation of the excitatory synaptic responses. We conclude that there is a non-linear interaction between these excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents that is not due to hyperpolarization itself, but probably is a result of their own synaptic conductance changes, i.e. shunting. Since these events are evoked by identical visual stimuli, this interaction may play a role in visual processing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Chacron
Nonlinear Information Processing in a Model Sensory System
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2933 - 2946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.