JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 20, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00214.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/1498    most recent
00214.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, L. H.
Submitted on February 28, 2005
Accepted on April 13, 2005

Delay-Period Activity in Visual, Visuomovement, and Movement Neurons in the Frontal Eye Field

Bonnie M. Lawrence1*, Robert L. White1, and Larry H. Snyder1

1 Anatomy & Neurobiology, Washington University, ST LOUIS, MO, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bonnie{at}eye-hand.wustl.edu.

In the present study, we examined the role of frontal eye field neurons in the maintenance of spatial information in a delayed-saccade paradigm. We found that visual, visuomovement and movement neurons conveyed roughly equal amounts of spatial information during the delay period. While there was significant delay-period activity in individual movement neurons, there was no significant delay-period activity in the averaged population of movement neurons. These contradictory results were reconciled by the finding that the population of movement neurons with memory activity consisted of two subclasses of neurons, the combination of which resulted in the cancellation of delay-period activity in the population of movement neurons. One subclass consisted of neurons with significantly greater delay activity in the preferred than in the null direction ("canonical") while the other subclass consisted of neurons with significantly greater delay activity in the null direction than in the preferred direction ("paradoxical"). Preferred direction was defined by the saccade direction that evoked the greatest movement-related activity. Interestingly, the peak saccade-related activity of canonical neurons occurred before the onset of the saccade while the peak saccade-related activity of paradoxical neurons occurred after the onset of the saccade. This suggests that the former, but not the latter, are directly involved in triggering saccades. We speculate that paradoxical neurons provide a mechanism by which spatial information can be maintained in a saccade-generating circuit without prematurely triggering a saccade.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. M. Lawrence and L. H. Snyder
The Responses of Visual Neurons in the Frontal Eye Field Are Biased for Saccades
J. Neurosci., November 4, 2009; 29(44): 13815 - 13822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Curtis and J. D. Connolly
Saccade Preparation Signals in the Human Frontal and Parietal Cortices
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. M. Lawrence and L. H. Snyder
Comparison of Effector-Specific Signals in Frontal and Parietal Cortices
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1393 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.