JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 23, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00245.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/5/3024    most recent
00245.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butovas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butovas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, C.
Submitted on March 14, 2003
Accepted on July 22, 2003

SPATIOTEMPORAL EFFECTS OF MICROSTIMULATION IN RAT NEOCORTEX. A PARAMETRIC STUDY USING MULTIELECTRODE RECORDINGS

Sergejus Butovas and Cornelius Schwarz*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cornelius.schwarz{at}uni-tuebingen.de.

Using microstimulation to imprint meaningful activity patterns into intrinsically highly interconnected neuronal substrates is hampered by activation of fibers of passage leading to a spatiotemporal 'blur' of activity. The focus of the present study was to characterize the shape of this blur in the neocortex in order to arrive at an estimate of the resolution with which signals can be transmitted by multielectrode stimulation. The horizontal spread of significant unit activity evoked by near-threshold focal electrical stimulation (charge transfer 0.8-4.8 nC) and multielectrode recording in the face representation of the primary somatosensory cortex of ketamine anesthetized rats was determined to be ~1350 µm. The evoked activity inside this range consisted in a sequence of fast excitatory response followed by an inhibition lasting >100 ms. These two responses could not be separated by varying the intensity of stimulation while a slow excitatory rebound following the inhibitory response was restricted to higher stimulus intensities (>2.4 nC). Stimulation frequencies of 20 and 40 Hz evoked repetitive excitatory response standing out against a continuous background of inhibition. At 5 and 10 Hz stimulation, the inhibitory response showed a complex interaction pattern due to highly sublinear superposition of individual inhibitory responses. The present data help to elucidate the neuronal underpinnings of behavioral effects of microstimulation. Furthermore, they provide essential information to determine spatiotemporal constraints for purposeful multielectrode stimulation in neocortex.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.