JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 14, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00261.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/4441    most recent
00261.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, B. M.
Submitted on March 10, 2005
Accepted on September 8, 2005

Nonlinear modeling of auditory-nerve rate responses to wideband stimuli

Eric D. Young* and Barbara M. Calhoun

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eyoung{at}jhu.edu.

The spectral selectivity of auditory nerve fibers was characterized by a method based on responses to random-spectrum-shape stimuli. The method models the average discharge rate of fibers for steady stimuli and is based on responses to 100 noise-like stimuli with pseudorandom spectral levels in 1/8 or 1/16 octave frequency bins. The model assumes that rate is determined by a linear weighting of the spectrum plus a second-order weighting of all pairs of spectrum values within a certain frequency range of best frequency. The method allows prediction of rate responses to stimuli with arbitrary wideband spectral shapes, thus providing a direct test of the degree of linearity of spectral processing Auditory-nerve fibers are shown to rely mainly on linear weighting of the stimulus spectrum; however, significant second-order terms are present and are important in predicting responses to random-spectrum shape stimuli, although not for predicting responses to noise filtered with cat head-related transfer functions. The 2nd-order terms weight the products of levels at identical frequencies positively and the products of different frequencies negatively. As such, they model both curvature in the rate versus level function and suppressive interactions between different frequency components. The 1st- and 2nd-order characterizations derived in this method provide a measure of higher-order nonlinearities in neurons, albeit without providing information about temporal characteristics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. B. Ahrens, J. F. Linden, and M. Sahani
Nonlinearities and Contextual Influences in Auditory Cortical Responses Modeled with Multilinear Spectrotemporal Methods
J. Neurosci., February 20, 2008; 28(8): 1929 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Bandyopadhyay, L. A. J. Reiss, and E. D. Young
Receptive Field for Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons at Multiple Sound Levels
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3505 - 3515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Holmstrom, P. D. Roberts, and C. V. Portfors
Responses to Social Vocalizations in the Inferior Colliculus of the Mustached Bat Are Influenced by Secondary Tuning Curves
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3461 - 3472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. A. J. Reiss, S. Bandyopadhyay, and E. D. Young
Effects of Stimulus Spectral Contrast on Receptive Fields of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2133 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.