JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 26, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00284.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/2815    most recent
00284.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. R
Right arrow Articles by Lieber, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, S. R
Right arrow Articles by Lieber, R. L.
Submitted on March 15, 2006
Accepted on July 8, 2006

HIGH STIFFNESS OF HUMAN DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDONS IS SUITED FOR PRECISE FINGER POSITIONAL CONTROL

Samuel R Ward1, Gregory J Loren2, Scott Lundberg3, and Richard L. Lieber4*

1 Radiology and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, La Jolla, California, United States
2 Core Orthopaedics, Encinitas, California, United States
3 Emergency Medicine, Olive View Hospital, Los Angeles, California, United States
4 Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, La Jolla, California, United States; Dept. of Orthopaedics (9151), Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Univ. of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rlieber{at}ucsd.edu.

The objective of this study was to define the biomechanical properties of the human digital flexor tendons and to compare these biomechanical properties to other muscle-tendon units in the forearm. Mechanical measurements were performed on fresh-frozen tendons under physiological load and temperature conditions. Loads were determined by first measuring the physiological cross-sectional area of each digital belly of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and estimating maximum tension (Po) of that specific muscle head. Loading each tendon to the appropriate Po resulted in no significant difference in tendon strain among any of the tendons within each muscle (p>0.05) (digits 2-5) or between muscle types (FDP vs. FDS). The one exception to this finding was that a significantly higher strain at Po was observed in the FDP tendon to the small finger (p<0.05). Average absolute strains observed for the FDP and FDS tendons (1.20 ± 0.38%, n=39) were significantly lower than those observed previously in a study of the prime movers of the wrist. The measured strain of ~1.5% was less than half of that predicted to occur in muscles of this architectural design. Modeling sarcomere shortening magnitudes during FDP or FDS contraction yielded a value of only 0.10 µm which would have a negligible effect on the force generating capacity of these muscles. Thus, the high stiffness of the digital flexor tendons suits them well for fine positional control and would render their muscle spindles quite sensitive to length perturbations at the fingertips.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.