JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 18, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00298.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/4/2180    most recent
00298.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Foreman, R. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Foreman, R. D
Submitted on March 27, 2003
Accepted on June 12, 2003

Spinal neuronal responses to urinary bladder stimulation in rats with corticosterone and aldosterone onto the amygdala

Chao Qin1*, Beverley Greenwood-Van Meerveld2, and Robert D Foreman1

1 Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
2 Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Basic Science Laboratories, V.A. Medical Center, Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, Oklahoma City, OK, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chao-qin{at}ouhsc.edu.

Elevating glucocorticoids in the amygdala produces colorectal hypersensitivity through activation of lumbosacral spinal neurons. The aim of this study was to determine if descending modulation from the amygdala affects spinal processing of input from urinary bladder afferents. Fischer-344 rats received cholesterol- (inactive control), corticosterone-, or aldosterone-containing micropellets placed stereotaxically on the dorsal margin of the left and right amygdala (n=10 for each group). Seven days following amygdaloid implantation, extracellular potentials of single L6-S1 spinal neurons were examined for the response to graded (0.5-2.0 ml, 20 s) urinary bladder distension (UBD). Spontaneous activity of neurons with excitatory responses to UBD in aldosterone-implanted rats (11.0±1.7imp/s), but not in corticosterone-implanted rats, was higher than in the cholesterol-implanted group (6.6±1.1 imp/s, P<0.05). Noxious UBD (1.5 ml) produced a greater excitatory response (21.6±2.6 imp/s) in aldosterone-implanted rats compared to cholesterol- or corticosterone-implanted rats (15.1±1.5 and 13.6±1.4 imp/s; P<0.05). In contrast, the duration of excitatory responses to UBD in corticosterone-implanted rats (38.5±3.4 imp/s) was significantly longer than those in the aldosterone or control groups (26.8±1.8 and 24.7±1.5 imp/s). Neurons with low thresholds for excitatory responses to UBD were seen more frequently in aldosterone-implanted rats than in corticosterone or cholesterol treated rats (74% vs 44% and 39%, P<0.05). No difference in somatic field properties of spinal neurons responsive or non-responsive to UBD was found among the three groups. These findings suggest that both mineralocorticoid- and glucocorticoid-mediated mechanisms in the amygdala are involved in descending modulation to lumbosacral spinal neurons receiving inputs from the urinary bladder; and this mechanism may play a role in the activation and maintenance of primary central sensitization to noxious visceral stimuli.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
V. Neugebauer, W. Li, G. C. Bird, and J. S. Han
The Amygdala and Persistent Pain
Neuroscientist, June 1, 2004; 10(3): 221 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.