| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fujita{at}fbs.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Stereo processing begins in the striate cortex and involves several extrastriate visual areas. We quantitatively analyzed the disparity-tuning characteristics of neurons in area V4 of awake, fixating monkeys. Approximately half of the analyzed V4 cells were tuned for horizontal binocular disparities embedded in dynamic random-dot stereograms (RDSs). Their response preferences were strongly biased for crossed disparities. To characterize the disparity-tuning profile, we fitted a Gabor function to the disparity-tuning data. The distribution of V4 cells showed a single dense cluster in a joint parameter space of the center and the phase parameters of the fitted Gabor function; most V4 neurons were maximally sensitive to fine stereoscopic depth increments near zero disparity. Comparing single-cell responses with background multi-unit responses at the same sites showed that disparity sensitive cells were clustered within V4 and that nearby cells possessed similar preferred disparities. Consistent with a recent report (Hegde and Van Essen 2005), the disparity tuning for an RDS drastically differed from that for a solid-figure stereogram (SFS). Disparity-tuning curves were generally broader for SFSs than for RDSs, and there was no correlation between the fitted Gabor functions' amplitudes, widths, or peaks for the two types of stereograms. The differences were partially attributable to shifts in the monocular images of an SFS. Our results suggest that the representation of stereoscopic depth in V4 is suited for detecting fine structural features protruding from a background. The representation is not generic, and differs when the stimulus is broad-band noise or a solid figure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Kumano, S. Tanabe, and I. Fujita Spatial Frequency Integration for Binocular Correspondence in Macaque Area V4 J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 402 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Umeda, S. Tanabe, and I. Fujita Representation of Stereoscopic Depth Based on Relative Disparity in Macaque Area V4 J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 241 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Nakatsuka, B. Zhang, I. Watanabe, J. Zheng, H. Bi, L. Ganz, E. L. Smith, R. S. Harwerth, and Y. M. Chino Effects of Perceptual Learning on Local Stereopsis and Neuronal Responses of V1 and V2 in Prism-Reared Monkeys J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2612 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Sanada and I. Ohzawa Encoding of Three-Dimensional Surface Slant in Cat Visual Areas 17 and 18 J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2768 - 2786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Uka, S. Tanabe, M. Watanabe, and I. Fujita Neural Correlates of Fine Depth Discrimination in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10796 - 10802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hegde and D. C. Van Essen Role of Primate Visual Area V4 in the Processing of 3-D Shape Characteristics Defined by Disparity J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2856 - 2866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
