JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 25, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00320.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/1861    most recent
00320.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obhi, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Goodale, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Obhi, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Goodale, M. A.
Submitted on March 28, 2005
Accepted on May 17, 2005

Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing

Sukhvinder S. Obhi1* and Melvyn A. Goodale1

1 Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sobhi{at}uwo.ca.

It has been suggested that interference in symbolically cued bimanual reaction time tasks is caused primarily by the perceptual processing of stimuli, and not by motor preparation of the required movements. Here, subjects made movements of the right and left index fingers that varied in their spatial and motor congruence. Spatial congruence was manipulated by presenting symbolic cues (i.e., pairs of letters) on a computer screen cueing the required movement directions. Motor congruence was manipulated by altering hand orientation. Results showed that interference occurs at both the stage of stimulus processing and the stage of motor preparation. These effects were reflected in the latencies of the different bimanual movements, with both motor incongruence and spatial incongruence causing significant increases in reaction time. However, spatially incongruent movements that were made in response to incongruent visual cues demonstrated changes in reaction time that were more than double those of movements that required simultaneous activation of homologous muscles. Therefore, in symbolically cued bimanual reaction time tasks, although both motor and spatial constraints operate, there is a clear dominance of spatial incongruence on performance. Whilst motor incongruence effects are likely due to cross-facilitation in corticospinal pathways, spatial incongruence effects are probably due to interference between the mechanisms that identify incongruent stimuli and translate these cues into the appropriate movements.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.