JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 18, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00330.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/1/337    most recent
00330.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, T. R.
Submitted on March 31, 2004
Accepted on August 12, 2004

Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience

Kirk G. Thompson1*, Narcisse P. Bichot2, and Takashi R. Sato1

1 Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
2 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kgt{at}lsr.nei.nih.gov.

We investigated the saccade decision process by examining activity recorded in the frontal eye field (FEF) of monkeys performing two separate visual search experiments in which there were errors in saccade target choice. In the first experiment, the difficulty of a singleton search task was manipulated by varying the similarity between the target and distractors; errors were made more often when the distractors were similar to the target. On catch trials in which the target was absent the monkeys occasionally made false alarm errors by shifting gaze to one of the distractors. The second experiment was a popout color visual search task in which the target and distractor colors switched unpredictably across trials. Errors occurred most frequently on the first trial after the switch and less often on subsequent trials. In both experiments, FEF neurons selected the saccade goal on error trials, not the singleton target of the search array. Although saccades were made to the same stimulus locations, presaccadic activation and the magnitude of selection differed across trial conditions. The variation in presaccadic selective activity was accounted for by the variation in saccade probability across the stimulus-response conditions, but not by variations in saccade metrics. These results suggest that FEF serves as a saccade probability map derived from the combination of bottom-up and top-down influences. Peaks on this map represent the behavioral relevance of each item in the visual field rather than just reflecting saccade preparation. This map in FEF may correspond to the theoretical salience map of many models of attention and saccade target selection.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Mulckhuyse, S. Van der Stigchel, and J. Theeuwes
Early and Late Modulation of Saccade Deviations by Target Distractor Similarity
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1451 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Murthy, S. Ray, S. M. Shorter, J. D. Schall, and K. G. Thompson
Neural Control of Visual Search by Frontal Eye Field: Effects of Unexpected Target Displacement on Visual Selection and Saccade Preparation
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2485 - 2506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Ogawa and H. Komatsu
Condition-Dependent and Condition-Independent Target Selection in the Macaque Posterior Parietal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 721 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Peng, M. E. Sereno, A. K. Silva, S. R. Lehky, and A. B. Sereno
Shape Selectivity in Primate Frontal Eye Field
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 796 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Kim and M. A. Basso
Saccade Target Selection in the Superior Colliculus: A Signal Detection Theory Approach
J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 2991 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.F.W. Neggers, W. Huijbers, C. M. Vrijlandt, B.N.S. Vlaskamp, D.J.L.G. Schutter, and J. L. Kenemans
TMS Pulses on the Frontal Eye Fields Break Coupling Between Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2765 - 2778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Heinzle, K. Hepp, and K. A. C. Martin
A Microcircuit Model of the Frontal Eye Fields
J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9341 - 9353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. T. Serences and S. Yantis
Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 284 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Shen and M. Pare
Guidance of Eye Movements During Visual Conjunction Search: Local and Global Contextual Effects on Target Discriminability
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2845 - 2855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley and M. E. Goldberg
Neural Correlates of Attention and Distractibility in the Lateral Intraparietal Area
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1696 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. G. Thompson, K. L. Biscoe, and T. R. Sato
Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field
J. Neurosci., October 12, 2005; 25(41): 9479 - 9487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.