JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 9, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00330.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/1/105    most recent
00330.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berman, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Colby, C. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berman, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Colby, C. L
Submitted on March 24, 2007
Accepted on May 4, 2007

Dynamic Circuitry for Updating Spatial Representations: III. From Neurons to Behavior

Rebecca A Berman1, Laura M Heiser1, Catherine A Dunn1, Richard C Saunders2, and Carol L Colby1*

1 Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ccolby{at}cnbc.cmu.edu.

Each time the eyes move, the visual system must adjust internal representations to account for the accompanying shift in the retinal image. In the lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP), neurons update the spatial representations of salient stimuli when the eyes move. In previous experiments, we found that split-brain monkeys were impaired on double-step saccade sequences that required updating across visual hemifields, as compared to within hemifield (Berman et al. 2005; Heiser et al. 2005). Here we describe a subsequent experiment to characterize the relationship between behavioral performance and neural activity in LIP in the split-brain monkey. We recorded from single LIP neurons while split-brain and intact monkeys performed two conditions of the double-step saccade task: one required across-hemifield updating and the other within-hemifield updating. We found that, despite extensive experience with the task, the split-brain monkeys were significantly more accurate for within-hemifield as compared to across-hemifield sequences. In parallel, we found that population activity in LIP of the split-brain monkeys was significantly stronger for within-hemifield as compared to across-hemifield conditions of the double-step task. In contrast, in the normal monkey, both the average behavioral performance and population activity showed no bias toward the within-hemifield condition. Finally, we found that the difference between within-hemifield and across-hemifield performance in the split-brain monkeys was reflected at the level of single neuron activity in LIP. These findings indicate that remapping activity in area LIP is present in the split-brain monkey for the double-step task and co-varies with spatial behavior on within-hemifield compared to across-hemifield sequences.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.