JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 20, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00333.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/1115    most recent
00333.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voller, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hallett, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voller, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hallett, M.
Submitted on March 30, 2005
Accepted on April 19, 2005

Long-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement

Bernhard Voller, Alan St Clair Gibson, Mikhail Lomarev, Sulada Kanchana, James Dambrosia, Nguyet Dang, and Mark Hallett*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hallettm{at}ninds.nih.gov.

Stimulation of a peripheral nerve of a hand at rest modulates excitability in the motor cortex, and, in particular, leads to inhibition when applied at an interval of about 200 ms (long-latency afferent inhibition; LAI). Surround inhibition (SI) is the process that inhibits neighboring muscles not involved in a particular task. The neuronal mechanisms of SI are not known, and it is possible that LAI might contribute to it. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with and without movement of the index finger, the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured of two functionally distinct target muscles of the hand (abductor digiti minimi muscle = ADM, first dorsal interosseus muscle = FDI). Electrical stimulation was applied 180 ms before TMS to either the fifth finger or the index finger. Both homotopic and heterotopic finger stimulation resulted in LAI without movement. With index finger movement, motor output further decreased with homotopic and heterotopic stimulation in the ADM. In the moving FDI, however, there was no change with either homotopic or heterotopic stimulation. Additionally, in the unstimulated movement trials, LAI increased with the amount of unintentional co-activation that occurred despite attempts to maintain the ADM at rest. However, with finger stimulation added, there were almost no increased MEPs despite co-activation. These findings suggest that LAI increases during movement and can enhance SI.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Reis, O. B. Swayne, Y. Vandermeeren, M. Camus, M. A. Dimyan, M. Harris-Love, M. A. Perez, P. Ragert, J. C. Rothwell, and L. G. Cohen
Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 325 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. P. Coxon, C. M. Stinear, and W. D. Byblow
Selective Inhibition of Movement
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2480 - 2489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.