JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 22, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/2130    most recent
00338.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quairiaux, C.
Right arrow Articles by Welker, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quairiaux, C.
Right arrow Articles by Welker, E.
Submitted on March 31, 2006
Accepted on November 16, 2006

Modified sensory processing in the barrel cortex of the adult mouse following chronic whisker stimulation

Charles Quairiaux1, Michael Armstrong-James2, and Egbert Welker3*

1 Départment de Biologie Cellulaire et de Morphologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
2 Department of Neuroscience, Queen Mary Westfield College, University of London, London, United Kingdom
3 Départment de Biologie Cellulaire et de Morphologie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland; Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: egbert.welker{at}unil.ch.

Chronic stimulation of a mystacial whisker follicle for 24h induces structural and functional changes in layer IV of the corresponding barrel, with an insertion of new inhibitory synapses on spines and a depression of neuronal responses to the stimulated whisker (Knott et al. 2002). Under urethane anaesthesia, we analyzed how sensory responses of single units are affected in layer IV and layers II&III of the stimulated barrel column as well as in adjacent columns. In the stimulated column, spatiotemporal characteristics of the activation evoked by the stimulated whisker are not altered; however, spontaneous activity and response magnitude to the stimulated whisker are decreased. The sensitivity of neurons for the deflection of this whisker is not altered but the dynamic range of the response is reduced as tested by varying amplitude- and repetition rate of the deflection. Responses to deflection of non-stimulated whiskers remain unaltered with the exception of in-row whisker responses that are depressed in the column corresponding to the stimulated whisker. In adjacent non-stimulated columns, neuronal activity remains unaltered except for a diminished response of units in layers II & III to deflection of the stimulated whisker. From these results we propose that an increased inhibition within the stimulated barrel reduced the magnitude of its excitatory output and accordingly the flow of excitation towards layers II&III and the subsequent spread into adjacent columns. In addition, the period of uncorrelated activity between pathways from the stimulated and non-stimulated whiskers weakens synaptic inputs from in-row whiskers in the stimulated barrel column.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.