JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 5, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00341.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/473    most recent
00341.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erimaki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Christakos, C. N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erimaki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Christakos, C. N.
Submitted on March 27, 2007
Accepted on December 3, 2007

Coherent Motor Unit Rhythms in the 6-10 Hz Range During Time-Varying Voluntary Muscle Contractions: Neural Mechanism and Relation to Rhythmical Motor Control

Sophia Erimaki1 and Constantinos N. Christakos1*

1 Medical School, University of Crete, Laboratory of Systems Physiology, Division of Basic Sciences, Heraklion, Greece; Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, FORTH, Computational Neuroscience Group, Heraklion, Greece

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ccnncc{at}med.uoc.gr.

In quasi-sinusoidal (0.5-3.0 Hz) voluntary muscle contractions, we studied the 6-10 Hz motor unit (MU) firing synchrony and muscle force oscillation with emphasis on their neural substrate and relation to rhythmical motor control. Our analyses were performed on data from 121 contractions of a finger muscle in 24 human subjects. They demonstrate that coherent 6-10 Hz components of MU discharges coexist with carrier components and coherent modulation components underlying the voluntary force variations. The 6-10 Hz synchrony has the frequency of the tremor synchrony in steady contractions, and is also widespread and in-phase. Its strength ranges from very small to very large (MU/MU coherence >0.50) among contractions; and it is not related to the contraction parameters, in accord with the notion of a distinct 6-10 Hz synaptic input to the MUs. Unlike the coherent MU modulations and the voluntary force variations, the in-phase 6-10 Hz MU components are suppressed or even eliminated during ischemia, while the respective force component is drastically reduced. These findings agree with the widely assumed supraspinal origin of the MU modulations, but they also strongly suggest a key role for muscle spindle feedback in the generation of the 6-10 Hz synaptic input. They therefore provide important information for the study of generators of the 6-10 Hz rhythm which subserves the postulated rhythmical control and is manifested as force and movement components. Moreover, they argue for a participation of oscillating spinal stretch reflex loops in the rhythm generation, possibly in interaction with supraspinal oscillators.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.