|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Warwick Manufacturing Group and Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, Massachusetts, United Kingdom
2 Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Bron, France
4 CNS, New York University, New York, New York, United States
5 Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gabika71{at}yahoo.com.
Recording single neuron activity from a specific brain region across multiple trials in response to the same stimulus or execution of the same behavioral task is a common neurophysiology protocol. The raster plots of the spike trains often show strong between-trial and within-trial dynamics, yet the standard analysis of these data with the peristimulus time histogram (PSTH) and ANOVA do not consider between-trial dynamics. By itself, the PSTH does not provide a framework for statistical inference. We present a state-space generalized linear model (SS-GLM) to formulate a point process representation of between-trial and within-trial neural spiking dynamics. Our model has the PSTH as a special case. We provide a framework for model estimation, model selection, goodness-of-fit analysis and inference. In an analysis of hippocampal neural activity recorded from a monkey performing a location-scene association task, we demonstrate how the SS-GLM may be used to answer frequently posed neurophysiological questions including: What is the nature of the between-trial and within-trial task-specific modulation of the neural spiking activity? How can we characterize learning-related neural dynamics? What are the time-scales and characteristics of the neuron's biophysical properties? Our results demonstrate that the SS-GLM is a more informative tool than the PSTH and ANOVA for analysis of multiple trial neural responses and that provides a quantitative characterization of the between-trial and within-trial neural dynamics readily visible in raster plots, as well as the less apparent fast (1-10 ms), intermediate (11-20 ms) and longer (> 20 ms) time-scale features of the neuron's biophysical properties.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. M. Yu, J. P. Cunningham, G. Santhanam, S. I. Ryu, K. V. Shenoy, and M. Sahani Gaussian-Process Factor Analysis for Low-Dimensional Single-Trial Analysis of Neural Population Activity J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 614 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |