JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 18, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00347.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/4/2232    most recent
00347.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodall, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Syed, N. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodall, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Syed, N. I.
Submitted on April 9, 2003
Accepted on June 12, 2003

Anesthetic Treatment Blocks Synaptogenesis but not Neuronal Regeneration of Cultured Lymnaea Neurons

Alyson J. Woodall, Hiroaki Naruo, David J. Prince, Zhong-Ping Feng, William Winlow, Mayumi Takasaki, and Naweed I. Syed*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nisyed{at}ucalgary.ca.

Trauma and injury necessitate the use of various surgical interventions, yet such procedures themselves are invasive and often interrupt synaptic communications in the nervous system. Because anesthesia is required during surgery, it is important to determine whether long-term exposure of injured nervous tissue to anesthetics is detrimental to regeneration of neuronal processes and synaptic connections. In this study, utilising identified molluscan neurons we provide direct evidence that the anesthetic propofol blocks cholinergic synaptic transmission between soma-soma paired Lymnaea neurons in a dose dependent and reversible manner. These effects do not involve presynaptic secretory machinery but rather postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors were affected by the anesthetic. Moreover, we discovered that long-term (18-24 hours) anesthetic treatment of soma-soma paired neurons blocked synaptogenesis between these cells. However, after several hrs of anesthetic washout, synapses developed between the neurons in a manner similar to that seen in vivo. Long-term anesthetic treatment of the identified neurons VD4 and LPeD1 and the electrically coupled, Pedal A cluster neurons (PeA) did not affect nerve regeneration in cell culture as the neurons continued to exhibit extensive neurite outgrowth. However, these sprouted neurons failed to develop chemical (VD4 and LPeD1) and electrical synapses (PeA) as observed in their control counterparts. Following drug washout, appropriate synapses did reform between the cells, although this synaptogenesis required several days. Taken together, this study provides the first direct evidence that the clinically used anesthetic propofol does not affect nerve regeneration. However, the formation of both chemical and electrical synapses is severely compromised in the presence of this drug. This study emphasises the importance of short-term anesthetic treatment, which may be critical for the restoration of synaptic connections between injured neurons.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.