JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 9, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00359.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/1/224    most recent
00359.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chait, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J. Z
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chait, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J. Z
Submitted on March 30, 2007
Accepted on May 9, 2007

Stimulus context affects auditory cortical responses to changes in interaural correlation

Maria Chait1*, David Poeppel1, and Jonathan Z Simon2

1 Univ Maryland, United States
2 Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park; Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mariac{at}wam.umd.edu.

We use magnetoencephalography to investigate human auditory cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation (IAC). We studied transitions from correlated (identical signals at the two ears) to uncorrelated (different signals at the two ears) or vice versa, for two types of wideband noise stimuli: CHANGE signals contained a single IAC change (or none); ALT signals alternated between correlated and uncorrelated at a constant rate. The relevant transitions, from correlated to uncorrelated or vice versa, are physically identical in both stimulus conditions but auditory cortical response patterns differed substantially. CHANGE stimuli exhibited a response asymmetry in their temporal dynamics and magnetic-field morphology according to the direction of change. Distinct field patterns indicate the involvement of separate neural substrates for processing, and distinct latencies are suggestive of different temporal integration windows. In contrast, the temporal dynamics of responses to change in the ALT stimuli did not differ substantially according to the direction of change. Notably, the uncorrelated-to-correlated transition in the ALT stimuli showed a first deflection about 90 ms earlier than for the same transition in the CHANGE stimuli and with an opposite magnetic field distribution. This finding suggests that as early as 50 ms after the onset of an IAC transition, a given physical change is processed differentially depending on stimulus context. Consequently even early cortical activation can not be interpreted independently of the specific long term stimulus context used in the experiment.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.