JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 2, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00366.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/576    most recent
00366.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Smagt, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Albright, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Smagt, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Albright, T. D.
Submitted on April 9, 2004
Accepted on February 21, 2005

CONTEXTUAL MASKING OF ORIENTED LINES: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SURFACE SEGMENTATION CUES

Maarten J. van der Smagt, Christian Wehrhahn, and Thomas D. Albright*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tom{at}salk.edu.

The ability of human observers to detect and discriminate a single feature of a visual image deteriorates markedly when the targeted feature is surrounded by others of a similar kind. This perceptual masking is mirrored by the suppressive effects of surround stimulation on the responses of neurons in primary visual cortex (area V1). Both perceptual and neuronal masking effects are partially relieved, however, if the targeted image feature is distinguished from surrounding features along some dimension, such as contour orientation. Masking relief is likely to play an important role in perceptual segmentation of complex images. Because dissimilar surfaces usually differ along multiple feature dimensions, we tested the possibility that those differences may influence segmentation in an invariant manner. As expected, we found that the presence of surrounding features resulted in perceptual masking and neuronal response suppression in area V1, but that either orientation or contrast polarity differences between the target and surrounding features was sufficient to partially relieve these effects. Simultaneous differences along both dimensions, however, yielded no greater relief from masking than did either difference alone. Although the averaged neuronal effects of orientation polarity cues were thus invariant, the time course over which these effects emerged following each stimulus appearance was different for the two cues. These findings refine our understanding of the functions of non-classical receptive fields, and they support a key role for V1 neurons in surface segmentation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.