JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 13, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00366.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/4/2832    most recent
00366.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agam, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sekuler, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agam, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sekuler, R.
Submitted on April 8, 2005
Accepted on July 9, 2005

Imitating Unfamiliar Sequences of Connected Linear Motions

Yigal Agam1, Dan Bullock2, and Robert Sekuler3*

1 Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
2 Cognitive & Neural Systems, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
3 Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA; Cognitive & Neural Systems, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vision{at}brandeis.edu.

A fundamental challenge in neuroscience is to understand the mechanisms by which multi-component actions are represented and sequenced for production. We addressed this challenge with a movement imitation task in which subjects viewed the quasi-random, 2D movements of a disc and then used a stylus to reproduce the remembered trajectory. The stimulus disc moved along straight segments, which differed sufficiently from one another that it was possible to trace individual segments' fate in the resulting movement imitation. A biologically-based segmentation algorithm decomposed each imitation into segments whose directions could be compared to those of homologous segments in the model. As the number of linked segments in a stimulus model grew from three to seven, imitation became less accurate, with segments more likely to be deleted, particularly from a model's final stages. When fidelity of imitation was assessed segment by segment, the resulting serial position curves showed a strong primacy effect and a moderate recency effect. Analysis of pairwise transposition errors revealed a striking preponderance of exchanges between adjacent segments, which, along with the serial position effects, supports a competitive queuing model of sequencing. In analogy to results with verbal serial recall, repetition of one directed segment in the model reduced imitation quality. Results with longer stimulus models suggest that the segment-by-segment imitation generator may be supplemented in the final stages of imitation by an error-signal driven overlay that produces a late-course, real-time correction. Results are related to neural mechanisms that are known to support sequential motor behavior and working memory.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.