JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 9, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00374.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/2785    most recent
00374.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ren, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nuttall, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ren, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nuttall, A. L.
Submitted on April 9, 2006
Accepted on July 30, 2006

Group Delay of Acoustic Emissions in the Ear

Tianying Ren1*, Wenxuan He2, Scott Matthews3, and Alfred L. Nuttall4

1 Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States; Department of Physiology, Xian Jiaotong University, Xian, Shaanxi, China
2 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Xian Jiaotong University, Xian, Shaanxi, China
3 Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland , Oregon, United States
4 Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health & Research Center, Portland, Oregon, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rent{at}ohsu.edu.

It is commonly accepted that the cochlea emits sound via a backward traveling wave along the cochlear partition. This belief is mainly based on an observation that the group delay of the otoacoustic emission measured in the ear canal is twice as long as the forward delay. In this study, the otoacoustic emission was measured in the gerbil under anaesthesia not only in the ear canal but also at the stapes, eliminating measurement errors due to unknown external- and middle-ear delays. The emission group delay measured at the stapes was compared to the group delay of basilar membrane vibration at the putative emission-generation site, the forward delay. The results show that the total intracochlear delay of the emission is equal to or smaller than the forward delay. For emissions with an f2/f1 ratio smaller than 1.2, the data indicate that the reverse propagation of the emission from its generation site to the stapes is much faster than a forward traveling wave to the f2 location. In addition, that the roundtrip delays are smaller than the forward delay implies a basal shift of the emission generation site, likely due to the basal shift of primary-tone response peaks with increasing intensity. However, for emissions with an f1 much smaller than f2, the data cannot distinguish backward travelling waves from compression waves due to a very small f1 delay at the f2 site.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. He, A. Fridberger, E. Porsov, K. Grosh, and T. Ren
Reverse wave propagation in the cochlea
PNAS, February 19, 2008; 105(7): 2729 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.