| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
2 Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: misst26{at}pitt.edu.
The rodent whisker-to-barrel pathway constitutes a major model system for studying experience-dependent brain development. Yet, little is known about responses of neurons to whisker stimulation in young animals. Response properties of trigeminal ganglion (NV) neurons in two, three, four week-old and adult rats were examined using extracellular single-unit recordings and controlled whisker stimuli. We found that the receptive field size of NV neurons is mature in two week-old animals while response latencies, magnitudes and angular tuning continue to develop between two weeks of age and adulthood. At the earliest time recorded, NV neurons respond to stimulation of only one whisker and can be characterized as slowly or rapidly adapting (SA, RA). The proportion of SA and RA neurons remains constant during development. Consistent with known on-going myelination of NV axons, response latencies decrease with age, becoming adult-like during the third and fourth postnatal weeks for RA and SA neurons, respectively. Unexpectedly, we found that evoked response magnitudes increase several-fold during development, becoming adult-like only during the fourth postnatal week. In addition, RA neurons become less selective for whisker deflection angle with age. Maturation of response magnitude and angular tuning is consistent with developmental changes in the mechanical properties of the whisker, the whisker follicle, and the surrounding tissues. The findings indicate that whisker-derived tactile inputs mature during the first postnatal month when whisker-related cortical circuits are susceptible to long-term modification by sensory experience. Thus, normal developmental changes in sensory input may influence functional development of cortical circuits.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Shoykhet and D. J. Simons Development of Thalamocortical Response Transformations in the Rat Whisker-Barrel System J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 356 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F.-S. Lo and R. S. Erzurumlu Conversion of Functional Synapses into Silent Synapses in the Trigeminal Brainstem after Neonatal Peripheral Nerve Transection J. Neurosci., May 2, 2007; 27(18): 4929 - 4934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Borgdorff, J. F. A. Poulet, and C. C. H. Petersen Facilitating Sensory Responses in Developing Mouse Somatosensory Barrel Cortex J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2992 - 3003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Leiser and K. A. Moxon Relationship Between Physiological Response Type (RA and SA) and Vibrissal Receptive Field of Neurons Within the Rat Trigeminal Ganglion J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 3129 - 3145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Wilent and D. Contreras Stimulus-Dependent Changes in Spike Threshold Enhance Feature Selectivity in Rat Barrel Cortex Neurons J. Neurosci., March 16, 2005; 25(11): 2983 - 2991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
