JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 5, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00419.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1600    most recent
00419.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cotton, P. L
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cotton, P. L
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. T
Submitted on April 13, 2007
Accepted on July 2, 2007

Contralateral visual hemifield representations in the human pulvinar nucleus

Philippa L Cotton1 and Andrew T Smith1*

1 Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.t.smith{at}rhul.ac.uk.

The pulvinar is a major nucleus of the thalamus. Macaque pulvinar includes two sub-regions that are connected to the visual cortex and are retinotopically organised, but the organising principles of the visual portions of the human pulvinar are unknown. We employed two tasks to address the question of whether human pulvinar exhibits spatial organization, using event-related fMRI. The first was a global-motion discrimination with a rich visual stimulus and the second a luminance-discrimination task of similar difficulty that used a minimal visual stimulus. Both tasks required central fixation and covert peripheral attention. A group analysis of BOLD responses elicited in the motion-discrimination task revealed activity bilaterally in the ventral pulvinar (z = 2 in Talairach space). Clear position-specificity was observed, with activity elicited only by contralateral stimuli. Ipsilateral stimuli caused suppression. This locus of activity is distinct from the more dorsal (z = 10) region of the pulvinar that has previously been reported to be visually responsive but not retinotopic. In the luminance-discrimination task, similar activity was seen but it was weaker and detectable only in the left pulvinar. In additional experiments with no task, passively viewed global-motion stimuli also activated the ventral pulvinar bilaterally. Our results show for the first time a distinct, bilateral visual representation in human inferior pulvinar that appears to be contralaterally organised.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
I. Arend, R. Rafal, and R. Ward
Spatial and temporal deficits are regionally dissociable in patients with pulvinar lesions
Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2140 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.