JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 15, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00445.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/6/3224    most recent
00445.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grubb, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grubb, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, I. D.
Submitted on April 29, 2004
Accepted on December 11, 2004

Visual response properties of burst and tonic firing in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

Matthew S. Grubb1* and Ian D. Thompson1

1 University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: msg{at}physiol.ox.ac.uk.

Thalamic relay cells fire action potentials in two modes: burst and tonic. Previous studies in cats have shown that these two modes are associated with significant differences in the visual information carried by spikes in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). Here we describe the visual response properties of burst and tonic firing in the mouse dLGN. Extracellular recordings of activity in single geniculate cells were performed under halothane and nitrous oxide anaesthesia in vivo. After confirming that the criteria used to isolate burst spikes from these recordings identify firing events with properties described for burst firing in other species and preparations, we show that burst firing in the mouse dLGN occurs during visual stimulation. We then compare burst and tonic firing across a wide range of visual response characteristics. While the two firing modes do not differ with respect to spatial summation or spatial frequency tuning, they show significant differences in the temporal domain. Burst spikes are phase advanced relative to their tonic counterparts. Burst firing is also more rectified, possesses sharper temporal frequency tuning, and prefers lower temporal frequencies than tonic firing. In addition, contrast-response curves are more step-like for burst responses. Finally, we present analyses which describe the stimulus detection abilities and spike timing reliability of burst and tonic firing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. R. Llinas and M. Steriade
Bursting of Thalamic Neurons and States of Vigilance
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3297 - 3308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.