JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00460.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1751    most recent
00460.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. R G
Right arrow Articles by Everling, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. R G
Right arrow Articles by Everling, S.
Submitted on April 24, 2007
Accepted on June 22, 2007

Frontoparietal Activation with Preparation for Antisaccades

Matthew R G Brown1, Tutis Vilis2, and Stefan Everling3*

1 Neuroscience, U of Western Ontario, London, Canada
2 Physiology, Univ of Western Ontario, London, Canada
3 Physiology and Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: severlin{at}uwo.ca.

Several current models hold that frontoparietal areas exert cognitive control by biasing task-relevant processing in other brain areas. Previous event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have compared prosaccades and antisaccades, which require subjects to look toward or away from a flashed peripheral stimulus, respectively. These studies found greater activation for antisaccades in frontal and parietal regions at the ends of long (>=6s) preparatory periods preceding peripheral stimulus presentation. Event-related fMRI studies using short preparatory periods (<=4s) have not found such activation differences except in frontal eye field. Here, we identified activation differences associated with short (1s) preparatory periods by interleaving half trials among regular whole trials in a rapid fMRI design. On whole trials, a coloured fixation dot instructed human subjects either to make a prosaccade toward or an antisaccade away from a peripheral visual stimulus. Half trials included only the instruction and not peripheral stimulus presentation or saccade generation. None-the-less, half trials evoked stronger activation on antisaccades than prosaccades in the frontal eye field (FEF), supplementary eye field (SEF), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and precuneus. Greater antisaccade response-related activation was found in FEF, SEF, IPS, and precuneus but not in DLPFC or ACC. These results demonstrate greater preparatory activation for antisaccades versus prosaccades in frontoparietal areas and suggest that prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex are more involved in presetting the saccade network for the antisaccade task than generating the actual antisaccade response.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Curtis and J. D. Connolly
Saccade Preparation Signals in the Human Frontal and Parietal Cortices
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.