JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (February 23, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00471.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/1/429    most recent
00471.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Everling, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Everling, S.
Submitted on May 5, 2004
Accepted on February 19, 2005

Neural processes associated with anti-saccade task performance investigated with event-related fMRI

Kristen A. Ford1, Herbert C. Goltz1, Matthew R. G. Brown1, and Stefan Everling1*

1 Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: severlin{at}uwo.ca.

One of the hallmarks of cognitive control is the suppression of prepotent but inappropriate responses. Here we used event-related fMRI to measure functional brain activation during a stimulus-response incompatibility task. Subjects were instructed before a stimulus appeared either to look at the stimulus (pro-saccade) or to look away from the stimulus (anti-saccade). Eye movements were recorded so that functional brain activation could be grouped into pro-saccades, correct anti-saccades and errors (saccades towards the stimulus on anti-saccade trials). Correct anti-saccade trials were associated with significantly more activation in frontal and parietal cortical areas compared with pro-saccade trials during the late preparatory period before stimulus appearance. Correct anti-saccades evoked more activation than errors in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex and pre-supplementary eye fields during this period. No significant differences were found for any comparisons early in the preparatory period. Our data suggest that the preparation of an anti-saccade activates a large frontal and parietal network that may be involved in presetting the oculomotor system for the anti-saccade task. These findings indicate that a large network of frontal and posterior areas is modulated during the latter component of the preparatory period on anti-saccade compared with pro-saccade trials. The results further suggest that the activation level of frontal cortical areas prior to stimulus presentation is associated with subjects performance in the anti-saccade task. In contrast, we found no areas that were more active for correct anti-saccades than pro-saccades or for correct anti-saccades than error anti-saccades during the stimulus-response period. In fact, a number of posterior cortical areas and a few areas in the superior frontal lobe were more active during the stimulus-response period on pro-saccade trials than on anti-saccade trials. Error anti-saccades showed a larger activation in the ACC during the stimulus-response period compared with correct anti-saccades.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. S. Obhi, S. Matkovich, and R. Chen
Changing the "When" and "What" of Intended Actions
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2755 - 2762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. Velanova, M. E. Wheeler, and B. Luna
Maturational Changes in Anterior Cingulate and Frontoparietal Recruitment Support the Development of Error Processing and Inhibitory Control
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2008; 18(11): 2505 - 2522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Atten Percept PsychophysHome page
R. GODIJN and A. F. KRAMER
The effect of attentional demands on the antisaccade cost
Atten Percept Psychophys, July 1, 2008; 70(5): 795 - 806.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Curtis and J. D. Connolly
Saccade Preparation Signals in the Human Frontal and Parietal Cortices
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.F.W. Neggers, W. Huijbers, C. M. Vrijlandt, B.N.S. Vlaskamp, D.J.L.G. Schutter, and J. L. Kenemans
TMS Pulses on the Frontal Eye Fields Break Coupling Between Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2765 - 2778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. A. Clementz, S. B. Brahmbhatt, J. E. McDowell, R. Brown, and J. A. Sweeney
When Does the Brain Inform the Eyes Whether and Where to Move? an EEG Study in Humans
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2634 - 2643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. R. G. Brown, T. Vilis, and S. Everling
Frontoparietal Activation With Preparation for Antisaccades
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1751 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. Newsham, P. C. Knox, and R. W. I. Cooke
Oculomotor Control in Children Who Were Born Very Prematurely
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2595 - 2601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. S. Manoach, K. N. Thakkar, M. S. Cain, F. E. Polli, J. A. Edelman, B. Fischl, and J. J. S. Barton
Neural Activity Is Modulated by Trial History: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Effects of a Previous Antisaccade
J. Neurosci., February 14, 2007; 27(7): 1791 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Johnston and S. Everling
Monkey Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Sends Task-Selective Signals Directly to the Superior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., November 29, 2006; 26(48): 12471 - 12478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. L. Boxer, S. Garbutt, K. P. Rankin, J. Hellmuth, J. Neuhaus, B. L. Miller, and S. G. Lisberger
Medial versus lateral frontal lobe contributions to voluntary saccade control as revealed by the study of patients with frontal lobe degeneration.
J. Neurosci., June 7, 2006; 26(23): 6354 - 6363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.